Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 46:1 (2023) ► pp.29–53

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Understanding textual meaning-making in Chinese high school EFL learners’ writing

A systemic functional perspective

 | Hong Kong Polytechnic University
 | University of International Business and Economics
Published online: 2 August 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20045.xua
Abstract
The present study examines the ways Chinese high school EFL learners organize information in their writing. A class of 50 students at grade 9 from a local high school in Guangzhou, China, were recruited as participants. The students’ writing at grade 9 was collected as a corpus, comprising ten writing tasks from different text types. In order to gain a holistic understanding of the organization of information in student writing, the analytical framework of Theme at three levels – that is, clause, paragraph, and text – from Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2010). Teaching language in context. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar was adopted. Findings show that the students have varying degrees of control over information organization at different levels. In particular, the students are not proficient in organizing information at the paragraph level. Findings also show that registerial differences affect the organization of information. The study provides relevant pedagogical implications and recommendations for this group of learners.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Textual meaning making and L2 writing studies
    • 2.2Theme and information flow in writing studies
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Research questions
    • 3.2Analytical framework
      • 3.2.1Theme at the clause level
        • Three types of Theme (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2014)
        • Unmarked and marked Theme
      • 3.2.2Paragraph level: Thematic progression patterns
        • 1.Linear TP
        • 2.Constant TP
        • 3.Derived TP
        • 4.Mixed
      • 3.2.3Text level: Macro and hyper Theme
    • 3.3Participants
    • 3.4Data
  • 4.Results and findings
    • 4.1Choice of clausal Theme
      • 4.1.1Topical Theme
      • 4.1.2Multiple and simple Theme
      • 4.1.3Marked Theme
    • 4.2Thematic progression patterns
    • 4.3Macro-Theme and hyper-Theme
    • 4.4Summary of the findings
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Theme as an element in illustrating registerial difference
    • 5.2Theme as an enabling resource
    • 5.3Theme as an indicator of language proficiency
  • 6.Conclusions and implications
  • 7.Limitations and further research
  • Notes
  • References
References (48)
References
Berry, M. (1995). Thematic options and success in writing. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (pp. 55–84). Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolton, K., & Graddol, D. (2012). English in China today: The current popularity of English in China is unprecedented, and has been fuelled by the recent political and social development of Chinese society. English Today, 28(3), 3–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2009). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 50–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Q. (2019). Theme-Rheme structure in Chinese doctoral students’ research writing: From the first draft to the published paper. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 371, 154–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, X. T. (2002). Cohesion and coherence in English compositions. Journal of School of Foreign Languages Shandong Teachers’ University, 2(11), 94–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christie, F., & Dreyfus, S. (2007). Letting the secret out: Successful writing in secondary English. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30(3), 235–247.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2010). Teaching language in context. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebrahimi, S. F., & Khedri, M. (2011). Thematicity in research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. Educational Quest-An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 2(3), 287–292.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fan, F. (2010). A discussion on developing students’ communicative competence in college English teaching in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 111–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fries, P. H. (1981). On the status of theme in English: Arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum, 6(1), 1–38).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gao, W. (2012). Nominalization in medical papers: A comparative study. Studies in Literature and Language, 4(1), 86–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, C. F., Christopher, E. R., & Lam, J. K. M. (2000). The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: A corpus-based enquiry. English for Specific Purposes, 19(2), 99–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawes, T., & Thomas, S. (2012). Theme choice in EAP and media language. Journal of English for academic purposes, 11(3), 175–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herriman, J. (2011). Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leong, P. A. (2007). Developing the Message: Thematic progression and student writing. Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(3), 93–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, N., Lin, C. K., & Wiley, T. G. (2016). Learner views on English and English language teaching in China. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10(2), 137–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, A. (2013). A functional grammar approach to analysing Asian students’ writing. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 49–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, J. (2001). Thematic progression, cohesive devices and coherence in English writing: Analysis of CET-4 and CET-6 writing papers. Foreign Language Education, 22(5), 45–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse (2nd ed.). Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martınez, I. A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), 103–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). THEME as an enabling resource in ideational ‘knowledge’ construction. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (1st ed., pp. 20–54). Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Register in the round: Registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics, 2(1), 9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Teruya, K., & Lam, M. (2010). Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. A&C Black.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
North, S. (2005). Disciplinary variation in the use of theme in undergraduate essays. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 431–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (2009). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, L. (2015). English as a global language in China: Deconstructing the ideological discourses of English in language education. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2011). Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources: Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 243–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (1996). Introducing functional grammar (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Introducing functional grammar. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, X. W. (2010). TP pattern and coherence in English writing: Analysis of TEM-4 writing papers. Foreign Language Research, 21, 103–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wei, R., & Su, J. (2008). An analysis of foreign language use in Mainland China. The Journal of Chinese Sociolinguistics, 21, 9–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. (1995). Theme, process and the realization of meanings in academic articles. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (pp. 129–146). Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xuan, W. W. (2015). A longitudinal study of Chinese high school students learning English based on systemic functional text analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hong Kong Polytechnic University. [URL]
(2018). Understanding experiential meaning-making in Chinese adolescent L2 writing: A systemic functional perspective. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Understanding logical meaning-making in Chinese high school students’ EFL writing: A systemic functional perspective. Asian EFL Journal, 23(6.1), 7–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xuan, W. W., & Huang, X. E. (2017). Understanding interpersonal meaning-making in Chinese high school students’ ESL writing: A systemic functional perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(5), 227–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Q., Ramírez, J. A., & Harman, R. (2007). EFL Chinese students and high stakes expository writing: A theme analysis. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (9), 99–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, H., & Xuan, W. W. (2019). Word knowledge in academic literacy skills among collegiate ESL learners. Applied Linguistics Review, 10(2), 201–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Winfred Wenhui Xuan
2025. System networks as a resource in L2 writing education. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue