Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 20:1 (1997) ► pp.105–132
‘How not to answer a question’ revisited
A typology applied to the gendered use of avoidance strategies in Australian political media interviews*
Published online: 1 January 1997
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20.1.06bra
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20.1.06bra
Abstract
Women in politics in Australia have been in the spotlight recently as their numbers have increased over the last decade particularly with the unprecedented number of women elected in the 1996 General election and also with the 1994 promise of the ALP to increase the number of women preselected in winnable seats to 35% by 2002. Recent research on language and gender has shown that women and men use different discourse strategies when they speak and that women tend to be more ‘cooperative’ in their speech while men are more ‘adversarial’ (Tannen 1993). The context of this paper will be the highly public forum of the political media interview. The hypothesis that women avoid answering questions less than men is tested, showing that women do avoid answering questions less than men. The gendered use of different avoidance strategies is also examined but with no significant difference in the way questions are avoided. The use of prefered and disprefered answers, however, showed a gender difference with women using significantly more prefered answers than men. To define different types of answer and avoidance, the notion of topic used by Gardner (1987) and the Gricean Maxims (1975) are used.
References (20)
Bennett, C. (1995) Equivocation in political interviews: Understanding strategic ambiguity. ACAS Discussion Paper Series, The Australian Centre for American Studies, Sydney, University of Sydney.
Bilmes, J. (1988) The concept of preference in conversational analysis. Language in Society. 171:161-181.
Bull, P. (1994) On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13,2:115-131.
Bull, P. and K. Mayer (1993) How not to answer questions in political interviews. Journal of Political Psychology 14,4: 651-666.
Clayman, S. (1993) Reformulating the question: A device for answering/not answering questions in news interviews and press conferences. Text 13,2:159-188.
Di Pietro, J.A. (1981) Rough and tumble play: A function of gender. Developmental Psychology 17,1:50-58
Fishman, P. (1983) Interaction: The work women do. In B. Thome, C. Kramarae and N. Henley (eds) Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA, Newbury House.
Gardner, R. (1987) The identification and role of topic in spoken interaction. Semiotica 551, 1-2: 129-141
Goodwin, M.H. (1980) Directive/response speech sequences in girls’ and boys’ task activities. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker and N. Furman (eds.) Women and language in literature and society. New York, Praeger.
Greatbatch, D. (1986) Aspects of topical organisation in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees. Media, Culture and Society 81, 441-455.
Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In (eds) P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds) Speech acts (Syntax and Semantics 31) New York, Academic Press.
James, D. and J. Drakich (1993) Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In Tannen (ed.) Gender and conversational interaction. New York, Oxford University Press.
Kalcik, S. (1975) ‘... like Ann’s gynecologist or the time I was almost raped’: Personal narratives in women’s rap groups. Journal of American Folklore 881:3-11.
Keenan, E.O. and B.B. Schiefflin (1976) Topics as a discourse notion: A study of topics in the conversations of children and adults. In C.N. Li (ed.) Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.
Leaper, C. (1991) Influence and involvement: Age, gender and partner effects. Child Development 621:797-811.
Maccoby, E.E. (1986) Social groupings in childhood: Their relationship to prosocial and antisocial behaviour in boys and girls. In D. Olweus, J. Block and M. Radke-Yarrow (eds) Development of antisocial and prosocial behaviour. San Diego, Academic Press.
