Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 45:1 (2022) ► pp.76–97

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Cultural and politico-religious challenges impacting critical reading of text for Iranian postgraduates in Australia

ORCiD logo with link | Deakin University, Australia
 | Deakin University, Australia
Published online: 17 September 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19082.sho
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of cultural and politico-religious dominance on the practice of critical reading (CR) of texts by a group of Iranian postgraduate students in Australia. Four postgraduate students were interviewed individually four times (each time for reading one text) for critical understanding of two pairs of Persian texts, each with opposing viewpoints, on current socio-political and nationalistic debates of Iran. They were then involved in a focus group discussion for further critique of each other’s viewpoints. Findings indicate two major Persian constructs that influence CR: hefz-e zaaher ‘keeping up appearances’ and ta’sob/gheyrat, approximating to ‘one’s honor combined with prejudice and bigotry’. Findings also reveal that participants’ CR is contributed by heavy emotional attachment to nationalistic views engendered by Persian poetry. Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, too, found that emotional attachment in appraising text was true with American English speakers. Finally, the focus group discussion had a slight impact on encouraging CR. Overall, it seems that participants’ repositioned journeys in Australia have influenced their perspective.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: Linguistic, religious, and cultural diversity
  • 3.Literature, the frame of study, and significance
  • 4.Data collection and method of analysis
    • 4.1Participants and procedures
    • 4.2Reflexivity and positioning
  • 5.Data analysis and discussion
    • 5.1Cultural analysis: The concept of ta’sob/gheyrat
    • 5.2Politico-religious analysis: Power and domination
    • 5.3The influence of the focus group discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (53)
References
Abalkhail, J. M. (2018). Challenges of translating qualitative management data. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 33(1), 66–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abedinifard, M. (2019). Persian ‘Rashti jokes’: Modern Iran’s palimpsests of gheyrat-based masculinity. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 46(4), 564–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abrahamian, E. (2008). A history of modern Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bali, M. (2015). Critical thinking through a multicultural lens: Cultural challenges of teaching critical thinking. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 317–334). New York: Palgrave Macmillan, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bashiri, A., & Shahrokhi, M. (2016). Improving writing proficiency, autonomy, and critical thinking ability through process-based writing instruction: A study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(1), 232–244.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeman, W. O. (1986). Language, status and power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Emotion and sincerity in Persian discourse: Accomplishing the representation of inner states. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1481, 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourke, B. (2014). Positionality: Reflecting on the research process. The Qualitative Report, 191, 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappucci, J. (2015). Selecting a spiritual authority: The Maraji͑ al-Taqlid among first- and second-wave Iraqi Shi͑a Muslims in Dearborn, Michigan. Journal of Shi’a Islamic Studies, 8(1), 5–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cousin, G. (2010). Positioning positionality: The reflexive turn. In M. Savin-Baden & C. Howell Major (Eds.), New approaches to qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty (pp. 9–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dabashi, H. (2012). The world of Persian literary humanism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Y. (2015). Critical thinking education with Chinese characteristics. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 351–36). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elling, R. C. (2008). State of mind, state of order: Reactions to ethnic unrests in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 8(3), 481–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fahim, M., & Ahmadian, M. (2012). Critical thinking and Iranian EFL context. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 793–800. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Truth and juridical forms. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 (Vol. 31, Power, pp. 1–89). London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2006). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, L. A., & Piazza, S. V. (2008). Critically reading texts: What students do and how teachers can help. The Reading Teacher, 62(1), 32–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katouzian, H. (2010). The Persians: Ancient, mediaeval and modern Iran. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, M. Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21(1), 70–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lie, K. Y. (2010). Sustaining diversity in higher education: Engaging the critical literacy of multilingual students in a Malaysian postgraduate classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 71, 389–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luke, A. (2004). Foreword. In M. McLaughlin & G. Devoogd (Eds.), Critical literacy: Enhancing students’ comprehension of text (pp. 4–5). New York: Scholastic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manalo, E., Kusumi, T., Koyasu, M., Michita, Y., & Tanaka, Y. (2015). Do students from different cultures think differently about critical and other thinking skills? In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 299–316). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
May, T. (2011). Social research: Issues, methods and process (4th ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moon, J. (2008). Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, T. (2013). Critical thinking: Seven definitions in search of a concept. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 506–522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paton, M. J. (2015). The geography of styles of reasoning: East and West, North and South. Philosophy East and West, 65(1), 178–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A., & Blackledge, A. (2004). Introduction: New theoretical approaches to the study of negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. In A. Pavlenko & A. Blackledge (Eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts (pp. 1–33). Sydney: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pirzadeh, A. (2016). Iran revisited: Exploring the historical roots of culture, economics, and society. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaheen, N. (2016). International students’ critical thinking–related problem areas: UK university teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Research in International Education, 15(1), 18–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shokouhi, H. (2016). A case study on critical reflection: A Chinese postgraduate in Australia. In I. Liyanage & B. Nima (Eds.), Multidisciplinary research perspectives in education: Shared experiences from Australia and China (pp. 123–130). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shokouhi, H., & Fard Kashani, A. (2019). Language barrier and internal conflict among Iranian migrants in Australia: A case of unsettling tension. In S. H. Mirvahedi (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of Iran’s languages at home and abroad (pp. 199–223). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shokouhi, H., & Latifi, M. (2019). Empowerment and knowledge transformation through critical reading and thinking: A case study of Iranian university students. In R. Chowdhury (Ed.), Changing lives: Transformation and empowerment through education (pp. 58–72). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shomali, A. (2016). Razi on reason and political authority: A study on Medieval Persian political thought. Iranian Studies, 49(1), 29–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talebinezhad, M. R., & Matou, Z. (2012). EFL reading comprehension textbooks at university level: A critical thinking perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1746–1754. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “Big-Tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 161, 837–851. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1989). Structures of discourse and structures of power. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 121 (pp. 18–59). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 359–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Discourse, knowledge, power and politics: Towards critical epistemic discourse analysis. In C. Hart (Ed.), Critical discourse studies in context and cognition (pp. 27–63). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschuren, P. J. M. (2003). Case study as a research strategy: Some ambiguities and opportunities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(2), 121–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallace, M., & Wray, A. (2016). Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 221, 256–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaini, A., & Ollerhead, S. (2019). Reverse contrastive rhetoric in expository writing: Transfer and power relations at work. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 37(1), 41–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Zaini, Amin & Hossein Shokouhi
2023. Power dynamics and pragma-cultural sources of unsourced evidentiality in Persian. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:1 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Zaini, Amin & Hossein Shokouhi
2024. Unsourced evidentiality and critical reading: the case of international postgraduates in Australia. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 21:1 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Zaini, Amin
2022. Co-text and critical reading for international postgraduates in Australia. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 40:3 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Zaini, Amin
2025. Ambivalent reading: Ambivalence as a reading practice in critical literacy. Language Teaching Research 29:7 ► pp. 2825 ff. DOI logo
Shokouhi, Hossein
2020. Cultural Challenges for L2 Communication Among Persian Migrants in Australia. In Speaking English as a Second Language, ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue