Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 43:3 (2020) ► pp.228–246
Applying semantic gravity wave profiles to develop undergraduate students’ academic literacy
Published online: 20 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19012.bro
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19012.bro
Abstract
This study draws on Legitimation Code Theory (LCT), particularly semantic gravity waving, as a strategy for
academic literacies practitioners to conceptualise how knowledge in their field might be organised and presented. Students can be
guided to notice meanings related to context-dependency at the discourse and lexico-grammatical levels through the presentation of
semantic gravity waving profiles. For this study, semantic gravity waving profiles have been found useful for explaining the
rationale of a genre pedagogy approach, the structure of an Introduction-Method-Results-Discussion (IMRD) genre, and teaching both
lexical coherence for a theoretical framework section, and accurate use of determiners with non-count abstract nouns such as
“research”. Therefore, semantic gravity profiling seems to provide explanatory power as a pedagogical tool in the classroom.
Findings from a mixed method survey with sixty students as well as extracts from student texts before and after semantic gravity
waving profile pedagogical interventions are provided.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1LCT and CLIL
- 2.2Semantic gravity
- 3.Method
- 3.1Context
- 3.2Design
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Application of semantic gravity waving profiles to explain the logics of practice
- 4.1.1The genre-based pedagogical cycle
- 4.1.2Structure of the IMRD genre
- 4.2Micro level application of semantic gravity waving profiles
- 4.2.1Individual sections in the IMRD
- 4.2.2Individual language items
- 4.1Application of semantic gravity waving profiles to explain the logics of practice
- 5.Conclusion
References
References (51)
Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of teacher education, 59(5), 389–407.
Ballinger, S., & Lyster, R. (2011). Student and teacher oral language use in a two-way Spanish/English immersion school. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 289–306.
Bernstein, B. (1975). Class and pedagogies: Visible and invisible. Educational studies, 1(1), 23–41.
Bister, M. D. (2018). The concept of chronicity in action: Everyday classification practices and the shaping of mental health care. Sociology of health & illness, 40(1), 38–52.
Boardley, I. D., & Grix, J. (2014). Doping in bodybuilders: A qualitative investigation of facilitative psychosocial processes. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 6(3), 422–439.
Boughey, C. (2013). What are we thinking of? A critical overview of approaches to developing academic literacy in South African higher education. Journal for Language Teaching, 47(2), 25–41.
Boughey, C., & McKenna, S. (2016). Academic literacy and the decontextualised learner. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 1–9.
Blackie, M. A. (2014). Creating semantic waves: Using Legitimation Code Theory as a tool to aid the teaching of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 462–469.
Bozalek, V., D. Ng’ambi, D. Wood, J. Herrington, J. Hardman, & A. Amory. (Eds). (2015). Activity Theory, authentic learning and emerging technologies: Towards a transformative higher education pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
Chare, N. (2014). Literary veins: Women’s bodybuilding, muscle worship and abject performance. Performance Research, 19(1), 91–101.
Chuang, F. Y., & Nesi, H. (2006). An analysis of formal errors in a corpus of L2 English produced by Chinese students. Corpora, 1(2), 251–271.
Clarence, S. (2014). Enabling cumulative knowledge-building through teaching: A Legitimation Code Theory analysis of pedagogic practice in law and political science. Unpublished PhD thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa [available at [URL]].
(2016). Exploring the nature of disciplinary teaching and learning using Legitimation Code Theory Semantics. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 123–137.
Clarence, S., & McKenna, S. (2017). Developing academic literacies through understanding the nature of disciplinary knowledge. London Review of Education, 15(1), 38–49.
Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. P. (2012). Academic literacies and systemic functional linguistics: how do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 64–75.
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & society, 19(6), 829–859.
Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL - a pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Volume 41: Second and Foreign Language Education) (pp. 97–111). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Curry, T. J. (1993). The effects of receiving a college letter on the sport identity. Sociology of sport Journal, 10(1), 73–87.
Deng, Z. (2018). Bringing knowledge back in: perspectives from liberal education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3), 335–351.
Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K. (2013). Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 3–33.
Georgiou, H., Maton, K., & Sharma, M. (2014). Recovering knowledge for science education research: Exploring the “Icarus Effect” in student work. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 14(3), 252–268.
Jacobs, C. (2013). Academic literacies and the question of knowledge. Journal for Language Teaching, 47(2), 127–40.
Jones, R. L., Edwards, C., & Viotto Filho, I. T. (2016). Activity theory, complexity and sports coaching: An epistemology for a discipline. Sport, education and society, 21(2), 200–216.
Kilpert, L., & Shay, S. (2013). Kindling fires: examining the potential for cumulative learning in a Journalism curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(1), 40–52.
Macken-Horarik, M. (2011). Building a knowledge structure for English: Reflections on the challenges of coherence, cumulative learning, portability and face validity. Australian Journal of Education, 55(3), 197–213.
Macnaught, L., Maton, K., Martin, J. R., & Matruglio, E. (2013). Jointly constructing semantic waves: Implications for teacher training. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 50–63.
Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2013). Content and language integrated learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 911–20). Oxford: Blackwell.
Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2010). The European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
Martin, J. R. (2017). Revisiting field: Specialized knowledge in secondary school science and humanities discourse. Onomázein, 11, 111–148.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2005). Designing literacy pedagogy: Scaffolding asymmetries. In J. Webster, C. Matthiessen & R. Hasan (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language (pp. 251–280). London: Continuum.
(2007). Interacting with text: The role of dialogue in learning to read and write. Foreign Languages in China, 4(5), 66–80.
Maton, K. (2000). Languages of legitimation: The structuring significance for intellectual fields of strategic knowledge claims. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 211, 147–67.
(2009). Cumulative and segmented learning: Exploring the role of curriculum structures in knowledge building. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 43–57.
(2011). Theories and things: The semantics of disciplinarity. In F. Christie & K. Maton (Eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 62–84). London: Continuum.
(2013). Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 8–22.
(2014a). Building powerful knowledge: The significance of semantic waves. In B. Barrett & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum (pp. 181–197). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2016). Legitimation Code Theory: Building knowledge about knowledge- building. In K. Maton, S. Hood, & S. Shay (Eds.), Knowledge-building: Educational studies in Legitimation Code Theory (pp. 1–24). London: Routledge.
Maton, K., & Doran, Y. J. (2017). Semantic density: A translation device for revealing complexity of knowledge practices in discourse, part 1 – wording. Onomázein, 46–76.
Matruglio, E., Maton, K., & Martin, J. R. (2013). Time travel: The role of temporality in enabling semantic waves in secondary school teaching. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 38–49.
McNamara, M. S. (2010). What lies beneath? The underlying principles structuring the field of academic nursing in Ireland. Journal of Professional Nursing, (6), 377–384.
Morton, T. (2010). Using a genre-based approach to integrating content and language in CLIL: The example of secondary history. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 81–104). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Mitchell, R. L. G. (2010). Approaching common ground: Defining quality in online education. New Directions for Community Colleges, 1501, 89–94.
Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (1994). Exploring literacy in school English (Write it right resources for literacy and learning). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
