Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (1996) ► pp.1–25
Talk around text
Acquiescence or empowerment in secondary English
Published online: 1 January 1996
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19.2.01lov
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19.2.01lov
Baker and Freebody (1989) argued that the teaching of reading was the teaching of culture, and in learning the culture of schooling, children were learning how to respond to the authority of the teacher and the school texts. Their interest in analysing the talk around text which occurred in primary schools lay in critiquing the politics of school knowledge. In this paper, a transitivity analysis within a systemic functional grammar will be used to explore what the discourse of reading lessons looks like in one secondary school context, to examine what is being communicated about the culture of schooling and to come to a different conclusion to that of Baker and Freebody about the value of teacher and text-authorising strategies.
References (30)
Baker, C. and P. Freebody (1989) Talk around text: Constructions of textual and teacher authority in classroom discourse. In S. De Castell, A. Luke and C. Luke (eds) Language, authority and criticism. London, Falmer Press.
Barnes, D., J. Britton, and H. Rosen (1971) Language, the learner and the school. Harmondsworth, Penguin Education.
Bloome, D. (1989) Locating the learning of reading and writing in classrooms: Beyond deficit, difference and effectiveness models. Norwood, NJ, Ablex.
Christie, F. (1994) On pedagogic discourse: Final report of a research activity funded by the ARC 1990-2 Institute of Education, The University of Melbourne.
Green, J. and G. Weade (1990) The social construction of classroom reading: Beyond method. Australian Journal of Reading, 13,4: 326–336.
Green, J. and R. Kantor-Martin (1988) Exploring the complexity of language and learning in the life of the classroom. Paper presented at the Language and Learning Symposium. University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Gregory, M. and K. Malcolm (1981) Generic Situation and discourse phase Applied Linguistics Research Working Group, Toronto.
Hunter, I. (1991) Learning the literate lesson: The limits of the aesthetic personality. In C. Baker and A. Luke (eds.) Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy, John Benjamins.
Love, K. (1991) Towards a further analysis of teacher talk. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 14,2: 30–72.
(1994) A discourse analytic model of reflective practice. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 22, 2: 151–162.
Love, K. and D. Suherdi (in press) The negotiation of knowledge in an adult ESL class. Linguistics and Education, 7,4.
Nystrand, M. and A. Gamoran (1991) Instructional discourse, student engagement and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 3: 261–290.
Reid, I. (1992) Who framed the text? In J. Thomson (ed.)Reconstructing literature teaching. Sydney, Australian Association of the Teachers of English.
Rothery, J. (1995) Exploring literacy in school English. Sydney, Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Love, Kristina
2000. Personal response or critical response in secondary english discussions. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 23:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
