Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 18:1 (1995) ► pp.129–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Setting/interlocutor-related variation in oral performance of adult ESL learners

 | Victorian Adult Migrant Education Service
Published online: 1 January 1995
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.18.1.08cho
Abstract
The performance of six adult intermediate second-language learners on an oral task was examined. The subjects, sharing a number of characteristics, e.g. the source language (Polish), performed the same task twice, with two different interlocutors, in two different settings (familiar vs. ‘real-life’). The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of the familiarity of the setting/ interlocutor factors on the subjects’ performance. To analyse the surface structure errors obtained from the two interviews, Selinker’s (1972) error taxonomy was employed, thus yielding five error categories: language transfer, overgeneralization, simplification, communication based and teaching induced errors. The findings revealed that the unfamiliar, ‘real-life’ setting elicited significantly higher proportion of language transfer errors than the same task performed in the familiar environment. It is argued that adult, intermediate second-language learners, in a new, ‘real-life’ social setting, when confronted with an unfamiliar native speaker of the target language, revert to their native language, fall back on their prior knowledge to facilitate the task demands.
References (23)
References
Arabski, J. (1979) Errors as indications of the development of interlanguage. Review. Language Learning 30,2:505–507.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, L.M. (ed.) (1988) Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives. Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, L. and H. Giles (1984) Speech accommodation theories: a discussion in terms of second language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 461: 5–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984) Language style as audience design. Language in Society 131: 145–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. and M. Sharwood-Smith (1985) Interlanguage is not a state of mind. Applied Linguistics 6, 2: 101–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickerson, L.J. (1975) The learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable rules. TESOL Quarterly 9, 4: 401–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dulay, H., M. Burt, and S. Krashen (1982) Language two. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1987) Second language acquisition in context. London, Prentice-Hall International (UK) Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992) Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. and J. Schachter (eds) (1989) Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. New York, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordens, P. (1986) Production rules in interlanguage: evidence from case errors in L2 German. In Kellerman and Sharwood-Smith (eds).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. and M. Sharwood-Smith (eds) (1986) Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. (1991) Measuring classroom language change. MS, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrow, K. (1979) Communicative language testing: revolution or evolution? In C. J. Brumfit and K. Johnson (eds) The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sajavaara, K. (1986) Transfer and second language speech processing. In Kellerman (1986).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, M. (1990) Input from within: Utrecht research into cross-linguistic influence in formal language learning environments. In H. W. Dechert (ed.) Current trends in European second language acquisition research. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters: 219–229.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972) Interlanguage. IRAL 10, 3: 209–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992) Rediscovering interlanguage. London, Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1979) Interlanguage as chameleon. Language Learning 29, 1: 181–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988) Variation in interlanguage. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989) Accounting for style-shifting in interlanguage. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston and L. Selinker (eds) Variation in second language acquisition. Vol. 21. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters: 13–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarone, E. and G. Yule (1989) Focus on language learner. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, B. (1975) The use of overgeneralization and transfer learning strategies by elementary and intermediate students of ESL. Language Learning 25, 1: 73–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue