Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 17:2 (1994) ► pp.131–146
Signifying strategies and closed texts in Australian children’s literature
Published online: 1 January 1994
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.17.2.07ste
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.17.2.07ste
Abstract
This paper examines children’s literature as discourse and argues that attention to the textuality of children’s literature discloses a network of signifying strategies which serve to confine texts within a narrow band of socio-cultural values. The language of fiction written for children offers conventionalised discourses by means of which content is encoded. While there are many other books can be and are titled, these are culturally representative. They are symptomatic of the frames used in Australian children’s literature, and in effect disclose how that literature is complicit in the ideological construction of Australian childhood (or, in this case, adolescence). This is part of how children are socialized. Hence the mediators of children’s books focus attention on the ‘truth’-value of theme and content and perpetuate the illusion that discourse is merely transparent.
References (9)
Hunt, Peter (1978) The cliché count: A practical aid for the selection of books for children. Children’s Literature in Education 9,3:143–50.
(1988) Degrees of control: Stylistics and the discourse of children’s literature. In Nikolas Coupland (ed.) Styles of discourse. Croom Helm, London.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Unsworth, Len, Alejandra Meneses, Maili Ow González & Guillermo Castillo
He, Ming Fang, Jeff Sapp, Edwidge C. Bryant, Maria José Botelho, Betty Christine Eng, William F. Dejean & Jill Aguilar
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
