Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 17:1 (1994) ► pp.45–72
Thematic options in reports of previous research
Published online: 1 January 1994
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.17.1.03tho
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.17.1.03tho
Abstract
This paper discusses one identifying feature of journal articles — Reports or Citations. The study focuses on an examination of the syntactic choices available to writers for making reporting statements and the conditions governing such choices. There is a great deal of variation in the forms of the Reports in academic articles and one factor in this seems to be the writer’s choice of a particular element of the message as Theme of the reporting statement. The purpose of this research was to turn up information regarding thematic options and their distribution which would be useful for identifying the patterns of choice that are characteristic of reporting. We investigate the way in which the choice of Theme affects the syntactic form of the Reports. It is suggested that a typology of Reports based on participant Subject in the Theme element can be drawn up. Reports were categorised as having Agent Themes, Text Reference Themes or Content Term Themes. With these three main choices for Theme, variations are created when Textual, Interpersonal or Ideational elements in the form of Circumstantial Adjuncts work in conjunction with the Subject headword. The different syntactic forms of Reports resulting from different thematic choices are shown to be associated with the function of Reports in their contexts.
References (26)
Berry, M. (1989) Thematic options and success in writing. In C.S. Butler. R. Cardwell, and J. Channel (eds) Language and literature: Theory and practice. Nottingham, University of Nottingham.
Carter, B. (1968) An Examination of Items in Theme Position as an Entry Vehicle for Text Processing of Six Banking Articles. MA Dissertation, University of Birmingham.
Chafe, W. (1986) Writing in the perspective of speaking. In C.R. Cooper and S. Greenbaum (eds) Studying writing:Linguistic approaches. Beverly Hills, Sage.
Davies, F. (1988) Designing a writing syllabus in English for Academic Purposes: Process and product. In P. Robinson (ed.) Academic writing: Process and product. London, MEP.
(1989) Reading between the lines: Thematic choice as a device for presenting writer viewpoint in academic discourse. ELR Seminar Paper, University of Birmingham.
Firbas, J. (1970) Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to problems of functional sentence perspective. Papers on functional sentence perspective: First international symposium. The Hague, Mouton.
(1986) On the Dynamics of Written Communication in the Light of the Theory of Functional Sentence Perspective. In C. Cooper and S. Greenbaum (eds) Studying writing: Linguistic approaches. Beverly Hills, Sage.
Fries, P.H. (1981) On the status of theme in English: arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum 6,1:1–38. Also in J.S. Petofi and E. Sozer (eds) (1983) Micro and macro connexity of texts. Hamburg, Helmut Buske Verlag (Papers in Text Linguistics 451).
Giora, R. (1983) Segmentation and segment cohesion: On the thematic organization of the text. Text 3,2:155–181.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1966) Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 31:34–81 and 199–244.
(1970) The place of functional sentence perspective in the system of linguistic description. Papers on functional sentence perspective: First international symposium. The Hague, Mouton.
(1988) On the language of physical science. In M. Ghadessy (ed) Registers of written English. London, Pinter.
Leech, G. and M. Short (1981) Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. New York, Longman.
Lowe, I. (1987) Sentence initial elements in English and their discourse functions. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 2:5–33.
Swales, J. (1981) Aspects of Article Introductions. (Aston ESP Research Reports 1) Aston, University of Aston.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Buckingham, Joanna & Maurice Nevile
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
