Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 16:1 (1993) ► pp.83–108
On the analyzability of conversational fabrication
A conceptual inquiry and single case example
Published online: 1 January 1993
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.16.1.06emm
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.16.1.06emm
This paper sets out to clarify the nature of fabrication in relation to conversational interaction. Drawing upon work in the conversation analysis tradition, the paper argues that two dimensions to talk-in-interaction can be distiguished which permit a clearer understanding of the idea of fabrication. Fabrication involves questions of content or substance where the functional end is one of deception, but it can also be seen as referring to practices involved in the production of talk in institutional settings – courtrooms, news interviews, etc. -where a degree of rehearsal of what is to be said is deemed necessary. The paper then explores these dimensions of fabrication in the context of an examination of a tape recorded exchange between a police officer and his informer, an encounter which has been alleged to have been an ‘artifical facade’.
References (19)
Atkinson, J.M. and P. Drew (1979) Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London, Macmillan.
Davidson, J. (1984) Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J.M. Atkinson and J.C. Heritage (eds) Structures of social action. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
(1990) Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination. In J. Levi and A. Walker (eds) Language in the judicial process. New York, Plenum Press
Drew, P. and J. Heritage (1992) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Emmison, M. (1989) A conversation on trial: The case of the Ananda Marga conspiracy tapes. Journal of Pragmatics 131:363–380.
Garfinkel, H. and H. Sacks (1970) On formal structures of practical actions. In J.C. Mckinney and E.A. Tiryakian (eds) Theoretical sociology. New York, Appleton Century Crofts.
Heritage, J.C. (1985) Analysing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T.A. van Dijk (ed).
Heritage, J. and Watson, D (1980) Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversation: Some instances analysed. Semiotica 301:245–262.
Heritage, J.C., S. Clayman and D. Zimmerman (1988) Discourse and message analysis: The micro-structure of mass media messages. In R. Hawkins, J. Wiemann and S. Pingree (eds) Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes. (Sage annual reviews of Communication Research 16) Newbuey Park, Sage.
McHoul, A.W. (1987) Why there are no guarantees for interrogators. Journal of Pragmatics 111:455–471
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., and Jefferson, G., (1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50,4:696–735.
Schegloff, E.A., G. Jefferson and H Sacks (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair in conversation. Language 531:361–382.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Li, Min & Yan Xiao
Chepinchikj, Neda & Celia Thompson
Dynel, Marta
Emmison, Michael & Susan Danby
Emmison, Michael & Susan Danby
Nevile, Maurice & Johanna Rendle-Short
Nevile, Maurice & Johanna Rendle-Short
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.