Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 12:2 (1989) ► pp.107–120
Re-reading readability
A critique of Fry’s formula
Published online: 1 January 1989
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.12.2.07goo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.12.2.07goo
Abstract
This brief article critically examines the assumptions and shortcomings of lexico-syntactically based measures of readability, using the popular Fry’s readability scale as its prime example. Thereafter, it explores an alternative semantic approach to the issue by re-focusing upon three crucial cohesive factors in the development of textual meaning that Fry’s formula ignores, to its cost.
References (13)
Fry, E.B. (1968) A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading 11, 7: 513–516 & 575–578.
(1977) Fry’s readability graph: clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading 21, 6: 242–252.
Gardner, P.L. (1981) Students’ difficulties with logical connectives in science. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 4, 2: 50–63.
Joyce, J. (1928) Anna Livia Plurabelle. In H. Levin (ed.) (1966) The portable James Joyce. New York, Viking Press: 721–744.
