Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 12:2 (1989) ► pp.34–50
C.L.L. Revisited – addressing socio-cultural factors in language learning
Published online: 1 January 1989
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.12.2.03waj
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.12.2.03waj
Abstract
This article deals with the methodology of Community Language Learning (C.L.L.) from a cultural and discourse perspective. It seeks to demonstrate how C.L.L. can be exploited effectively in the classroom as a means of addressing the socio-cultural dimension of language learning and teaching. The original C.L.L. model (Charles Curran’s) is examined, and a modified version described and analyzed. The central feature of counselling strategies is highlighted and illustrated, demonstrating the importance of negotiating rather than imposing meaning. The article then explores how C.L.L. is effective in reaching a number of short-term goals: e.g. text repair; learning about socio-cultural conventions and learning to use language appropriate to these conventions; exposing incidents of language failure and reasons for these. The importance of the teacher’s understanding of discourse conventions is underlined. Finally C.L.L. is reviewed in terms of both its weaknesses and strengths.
References (11)
Curran, C.A. (1960) Community language learning. In R.W. Blair (ed) (1982) Innovative approaches to language teaching. Rowley, Massachusetts, Newbury House: 146–159.
(1972a) Counselling-Learning. In Oller et al. (eds) Methods That Work. Rowley, Massachusetts, Newbury House.
(1978) A Linguistic model for learning and living in this New Age of the person. In R.W. Blair (ed.) (1982) Innovative Approaches to language teaching. Rowley, Massachusetts, Newbury House.
Gattegno, C. (1972) Teaching foreign languages in schools: the silent way. New York, Educational Solutions.
Keller, E. (1981) Gambits: Conversational strategy signals. In F. Coulmas (ed.) (1981) Conversational routine. The Hague, Mouton: 93–113.
