Article published In: Australian Applied Language Studies
Edited by Tim F. McNamara
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 10:2] 1987
► pp. 83–113
Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing
Published online: 1 January 1987
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.10.2.07pie
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.10.2.07pie
Abstract
In this article it is claimed that there is a set of universal speech processing constraints which applies to all types of second language acquisition. These constraints define the range of possible hypotheses about the structure of the L2 which a learner can create at a given stage of development and cannot be overridden by formal instruction or by other alterations in the linguistic input.
These claims, however, do not imply that all types of language acquisition are identical or that teaching has no influence whatsoever on the way a second language develops in a formal context. It has been shown elsewhere (cf. Pienemann, 1984, 1985, 1987a) that under certain conditions teaching can influence formal L2 development. These demonstrable positive effects of teaching, however, remain inside the variational margin left open by the processing constraints.
The present paper reports on the interlanguage development of one learner of German as a second language, selected from a broader longitudinal study of one year’s duration. It was found that the learner’s word order development was identical to the natural development of German as a second language despite the progression intended in the teaching. A similar result was obtained in the development of verbal morphology. It is also shown that agreement marking is acquired at the same time as specific word order rules.
References (35)
Bausch, K. R. and F. Koenigs (1983) Lernt oder erwirbt man Fremdsprachen im Unterricht? Die Neueren Sprachen 12,4:308–336.
Butzkamm, W. (1973) Aufgeklärte Einsprachlgkeit: zur Entdogmatlsierung der Methode im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Heidelberg, Quelle und Meyer.
Clahsen, H. (1980) Psycholinguistic aspects of L2 acquisition: word order phenomena in foreign workers’ interlanguage. In S. Felix (ed.) Second language development: trends and issues. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag: 57–80.
(1984) The acquisition of German word order: a test case for cognitive approaches to L2 development. In R. W. Andersen (ed.) Second languages: a cross-linguistic perspective. Rowley, Mass., Newbury House: 219–242.
Clahsen, H., J. Meisel and M. Pienemann (1983) Deutsch als Zweitsprache: der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag.
Ellis, R. (1984) Can syntax be taught? a study of the effects of formal instruction on the acquisition of WH questions in children. Applied Linguistics 5,2:138–155.
Felix, S. (1981) The effect of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Language Learning 31,1:87–112.
Kaplan, R. M. (1975) On process models of sentence analysis. In D. A. Norman and D. E. Rumelhart (eds.) Explorations in cognition. San Francisco, Freeman: 117–135.
Leont’ev A. A. (1975) Psychollnguistlscbe Einheiten und die Erzeugung spracblicber Äußerungen. Translated into German by F. Juttner. Berlin, Akademie-Verlag. (Original Russian edition 1969).
Llghtbown, P. M. (1983) Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences. In H. W. Seliger and M. H. Long (eds.) Classroom-oriented research on second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass., Newbury House: 217–245.
Melsel, J. (1983) Strategies of second language acquisition: more than one kind of simplification! In R. W. Andersen (ed.) Pldginlzation and creollzatlon as language acquisition. Rowley Mass., Newbury House: 120–157.
Meisel, J., H. Clahsen and M. Pienemann (1981) On determining developmental stages in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3,2:109–135.
Netschajeff, A. (1908) Psychologische Betrachtungen zur Frage über den fremdländischen Unterricht. Pädagogisch-psychologische Studien 91:1–6.
Otto, E. (1921) Methodik und Didaktik des neusprachllchen Unterrichts: Versuoh elner wlssenschaftlichen Unterrichtslehre. Bielefeld, Yelhagen und Klasing.
Peterson, H. A. (1903) Recall of words, objects, and movements. In H. Munsterberg (ed.) Harvard Psychological Studies Vol. 11. New York: 207–233.
Piaget, J. (1950) The psychology of Intelligence. Translated by M. Piercy and D. E. Berlyne. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original French edition 1947).
Pica, T. (1983) Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning 33, 4:465–497.
Pienemann, M. (1980) The second language acquisition of immigrant children. In S. Felix (ed.) Second language development: trends and Issues. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag: 41–56.
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6,2:186–214.
(1985) Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (eds.) Modelling and assessing second language development. Clevedon, Avon, Multilingual Matters: 23–75.
(1987a) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Australian Working Papers in Language Development 1,3:1–41.
(1987b) Analyzing language acquisition data with a microcomputer: COLIAN. MS, University of Sydney and Universitat Duisburg.
Pienemann, M. and M. Johnston (1985) Towards an explanatory model of language acquisition. Paper presented at the 1985 Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum, UCLA, February 22–24.
(1986) An acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 9,1:92–122.
Scherer, G. A. C. and M. Wertheimer (1964) A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York, McGraw Hill Book Co.
Solmecke, G. (1983) Foreign language teaching: the state of the art. In S. W. Felix and H. Wode (eds.) Language development at the crossroads. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag: 137–144.
Swenson, L. C. (1980) Theories of learning. Traditional perspectives/contemporary developments. Belmont, CA, Wadswortb Publishing Co.
Wilkins, D. A. (1976) Notional syllabuses: a taxonomy and its relevance for foreign language curriculum development. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Cited by (21)
Cited by 21 other publications
Yessenbekova, Kymbat
Valizadeh, Mohammadreza
De Oliveira dutra, Eduardo
Tammenga-Helmantel, Marjon & Minna Maijala
Bonilla, Carrie L.
2015. Chapter 10. Instructing Stages of Processability Theory in L2 Spanish. In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 4], ► pp. 205 ff.
Lantolf, James P. & Xian Zhang
Pienemann, Manfred
Zhang, Xian & James P. Lantolf
Hulstijn, Jan H., Richard F. Young, Lourdes Ortega, Martha Bigelow, Robert DeKeyser, Nick C. Ellis, James P. Lantolf, Alison Mackey & Steven Talmy
Gozdawa-Gołębiowski, Romuald
Baten, Kristof
Boss, Bettina
Boss, Bettina
MASUDA, KYOKO
Dyson, Bronwen Patricia
1996. The debate on form-focused instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 59 ff.
Pienemann, Manfred & Malcolm Johnston
TSCHIRNER, ERWIN
Eubank, Lynn
Lightbown, Patsy M. & Nina Spada
Pienemann, Manfred, Malcolm Johnston & Geoff Brindley
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
