Review published In: Genre and Disciplinarity
Edited by Tim Moore, Janne Morton and Steve Price
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 41:2] 2018
► pp. 234–239
Book review
Ursula Wingate, Academic Literacy and Student Diversity: The Case for Inclusive Practice
Reviewed by
Published online: 10 January 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.00012.pri
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.00012.pri
References (10)
Freadman, A. (1994). ‘Anyone for Tennis?’ In A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds), Genre and the New rhetoric (pp. 43–66). London: Taylor and Francis.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). London: Penguin.
Lea, M. (2005). ‘Communities of practice’ in higher education; useful heuristic or educational model?. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond Communities of Practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 180–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, C. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67–78). London: Taylor and Francis.
Ochs, E. (1986). Introduction. In B. Schieffelin and E. Ochs (eds) Language Socialisation across Cultures (pp. 1–13). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
