Cover not available

Article published In: Genre and Disciplinarity
Edited by Tim Moore, Janne Morton and Steve Price
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 41:2] 2018
► pp. 185–204

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Constructing knowledge and identity in a professionally-oriented discipline

What’s at stake in genre variation?

 | University of Melbourne
Published online: 10 January 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.00009.mor
Abstract
Central to rhetorical genre theory is the notion of ‘rhetorical situation’ (Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), which emphasizes context as sociohistorically situated. In the analysis of academic genres, this notion helps us to think of the contexts that genres respond to as dynamic, varying across time and space, rather than as stable and unified disciplinary discourse communities. From this social perspective, academic disciplines are theorized as including a great number and range of rhetorical situations (Paré, A. (2014). Rhetorical genre theory and academic literacy. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(1), 83–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), and the idea of genre variation becomes of increasing scholarly interest. In this study, rhetorical genre theory and the concept of ‘rhetorical situation’ provide a framing for the analysis of a recurrent discursive event. The event is the design studio ‘crit’, a weekly presentation and review of students’ in-progress design ideas and artifacts, through which the teaching and learning of architectural design is enacted in the academy. In a professionally-oriented discipline such as architecture, curriculum genres often need to negotiate tensions between the academy and the profession. Applied to such settings, a rhetorical genre approach invites us to think about whose values and knowledge dominate, and who has the authority to adapt the genre to suit its changing needs. This paper reports on interviews with five design teachers (one senior academic and four professional practitioners). The interviews reveal how the teachers take up the crit genre in diverse ways, including what counts as knowledge and competence in the design studio and how this knowledge is best taught, learnt and assessed. The paper concludes that students would benefit from a genre pedagogy that focuses on genre variation, its sources and its consequences, as well as genre conventionality.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Genre as variation
  • 3.A study of the design studio
  • 4.What’s at stake in variation in the design studio genre?
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (54)
References
Ackerman, J., & Oats, S. (1996). Image, text, and power in architectural design and workplace writing. In A. H. Duin & C. J. Hansen (Eds.), Non-academic writing: Social theory and technology (pp. 81–121). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Artemeva, N. (2009). Stories of becoming: A study of novice engineers learning genres of their profession. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 158–178). Indiana: WACC/Parlor Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (V. W. McGee, Trans.) Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (2004). Narrative discourse and identities. In J. C. Meister, T. Kindt, W. Schernus, & M. Stein (Eds.), Narratology beyond literary criticism (pp. 213–237). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartholomae, D. (1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can’t write: Studies in writer’s block and other writing process problems (pp. 134–165). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 191, 59–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Horner, B. (2017). Mobility and academic literacies: An epistolary conversation. London Review of Education, 15(1), 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bawarshi, A. S., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research and pedagogy. West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coutinho, M. A., & Miranda, F. (2009). To describe genres: Problems and strategies. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 35–55). Indiana: Parlor Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuff, D. (1991). Architecture: The story of practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dannels, D. P. (2005). Performing tribal rituals: A genre analysis of “crits” in design studios. Communication Education, 54(2), 136–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devitt, A. J. (2015). Genre performances: John Swales’ genre analysis and rhetorical-linguistic genre studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 191, 44–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2014). Measuring the voice of disciplinarity in scientific writing: A longitudinal exploration of experienced writers in geology. English for Specific Purposes, 341, 14–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 91–102). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freedman, A., Adam, C., & Smart, G. (1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating genres and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11(2), 193–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freeland, J. M. (1971). The making of a profession: A history of the growth and work of the architectural institutes in Australia. Sydney: Angus & Robertson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frow, J. (2006). Genre. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gusevich, M. (1991). The architecture of criticism: A question of autonomy. In A. Kahn (Ed.), Drawing, building, text (pp. 8–24). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2010). Community and individuality: Performing identity in applied linguistics. Written Communication, 27(2), 159–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irvine, J. (1996). Shadow conversations and the indeterminacy of participant roles. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (Eds.), Natural histories of discourses (pp. 160–202). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, L. (1997). Expedition of discovery: Architectural education at Newcastle. In R. Ballantyne, J. Bain, & J. Packer (Eds.), Reflecting on university teaching: Academics’ stories (pp. 437–444). Canberra, ACT: Department of Employment, Education, Training & Youth Affairs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 231, 157–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medway, P. (1996). Virtual and material buildings: Construction and constructivism in architecture and writing. Written Communication, 131, 473–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mewburn, I. (2009). Constructing bodies: Gesture, speech and representation at work in architectural design studios (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, C. R. (2017). Where do genres come from? In C. R. Miller & A. R. Kelly (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 1–34). Palgrave, Macmillan: Cham. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, C., & Shepherd, D. (2004). Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In L. Gurak, S. Antonijevic, L. Johnston, C. Ratliff, & J. Reymann (Eds.), Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Libraries. Retrieved from [URL]
Morton, J. (2013). Becoming architectural: Communities and genres in design studio pedagogy (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paré, A. (2014). Rhetorical genre theory and academic literacy. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(1), 83–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, C. (2015). Genres in the forefront, languages in the background: The scope of genre analysis in language-related scenarios. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 191, 10–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Voices in text, mind and society: Sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisition and use. Journal of Second Language Writing, 101, 55–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robbins, E. (1994). Why architects draw. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowley-Jolivet, E., & Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: Context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schön, D. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potential. London: Royal Institute of British Architects.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Star, S., & Greisemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. M., Barks, D., Ostermann, A., & Simpson, R. (2001). Between critique and accommodation: Reflections on an EAP course for masters of architecture students. English for Specific Purposes, 201, 439–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tardy, C. M. (2016). Beyond convention: Genre innovation in academic writing. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Threadgold, T. (1989). Talking about genre: Ideologies and incompatible discourses. Cultural Studies, 3(1), 101–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webster, H. (2005). The architectural review: A study of ritual, acculturation and reproduction in architectural education. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 4(3), 265–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). A Foucauldian look at the design jury. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 5(1), 5–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yaneva, A. (2005). Scaling up and down: Extraction trials in architectural design. Social Studies of Science, 35(6), 867–894. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Charles, Maggie
2025. English for Academic Purposes. In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue