Cover not available

Article published In: Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Vol. 3:1 (2017) ► pp.6794

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (43)
References
Arnon, Inbal, & Snider, Neal (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bannard, Colin, & Lieven, Elena (2012). Formulaic language in L1 acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 3–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffery, Conrad, Susan, & Finegan, Edward (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex, UK: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York; Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Yu-Hua, & Baker, Paul (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), 30–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conklin, Kathy, & Schmitt, Norbert (2012). The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 45–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Grevile, Hippisley, Andrew R., Brown, Dunstan, & Marriott, Paul (2001). Frequency, regularity, and the paradigm: A perspective from Russian on a complex relation. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 201–226). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowan, Nelson (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrant, Philip, & Doherty, Alice (2010). Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6(2), 125–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fratini, Viviana, Acha, Joana, & Laka, Itziar (2014). Frequency and morphological irregularity are independent variables. Evidence from a corpus study of Spanish verbs. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 10(2), 289–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stephan Th., Hampe, Beate, & Schönefeld, Doris (2005). Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(4), 635–676. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin (2008). Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics, 39(6), 1041–1070. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heffernan, Kevin (2012). Kansaiben kōpasu no shōkai [An introduction to the Corpus of Kansai Vernacular Japanese]. Sōgōseisaku Kenkyū, 411, 157–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heffernan, Kevin, & Hiratsuka, Yusuke (in press). Morphological relative frequency impedes the use of stylistic variants: Evidence from a corpus of vernacular Japanese. Asia Pacific Language Variation.
Hoey, Michael (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Stroud, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horio, Kei (2014). Wakamono kotoba ni mirareru gengo henka ni kan suru kenkyū [Research on language change in Japanese youth language]. Doctoral dissertation, Kyushu University, Japan. Retrieved October 1, 2016, from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horasawa, Shin (2011). Wakamonotachi ga shiyō suru ‘bokashi kotoba’: ‘Kana, mitaina’ to ‘ttekanji’ no goyōronteki kinō [The prgamatic function of the ambigious expressions ‘kana / mitaina’ and ‘ttekanji’ among young people]. Gifu daigaku chiiki kagakubu kenkyū hōkoku, 281, 41–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoshino, Yuko (2009). Komyunikēshon sutoratejī toshite no in’yō hyōgen: Hatsuwamatsu no ‘mitai-na’ no hyōgen kōka. [Direct quotations as a communication strategy: The expressive functions of utterance-final ‘mitai-na’]. Ningen bunka sōsei kagaku ronsō, 111, 133–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Mariko (2012). ‘Mitai’ no shiteki hensen [On the diachronic change of the expression ‘mitai’]. Okayama Daigaku Daigakuin Shakaibunka Kagaku Kenkyūka Kiyō, 341, 163–182.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juknevičienė, Rita (2009). Lexical bundles in learner language: Lithuanian learners vs. native speakers. Kalbotyra, 61(3), 61–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. (2005). Movement and silence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiper, Koenraad (1996). Smooth talkers: The linguistic performance of auctioneers and sportscasters. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsutomo, Etsuko, Miyamoto, Jun, & Wakuri, Masako (2007). Essential Japanese expressions includes English, Chinese, and Korean translations. Tokyo: Aruku.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maeda, Naoko (2004). Bunmatu hyōgen ‘mitaina’ no kinō [The pragmatic function of the sentence-final expression mitai-na]. Gekkan Gengo, 33(10), 54–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, David E., & Schvaneveldt, Roger W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva P., Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., The Google Books Team, …Aiden, Erez L. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331(6014), 176–2182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, George A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohba, Mihoko (2009). Bunmatsu ni mochiirareru ‘mitai-na’ [On the expression mitai-na used at the end of a sentence]. Nihongo to Nihongo Kyōiku, 371, 43–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew, & Syder, Frances H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack C. Richards & Richards W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–225). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg (2017). A framework for understanding linguistic entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning (pp. 9–35). American Psychology Association and Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna (2015). On the ‘holistic’ nature of formulaic language. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(2), 285–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna, Conklin, Kathy, & van Heuven, Walter J. B. (2011). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition, 37(3), 776–784. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, & Gries, Stefan Th. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabossi, Patrizia, Fanari, Rachele, & Wolf, Kinou (2009). Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory & Cognition, 37(4), 529–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In Edith L. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 69–88). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, Antoine, & Baayen, Harald (2010). Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In David Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 151–173). London, UK: The Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, Antoine, Derwing, Bruce, Libben, Gary, & Westbury, Chris (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61(2), 569–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, Alison (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 231–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

FILE‐MURIEL, RICHARD J.
2023. Phonetics, Phonology, and Usage‐Based Approaches. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics,  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Heffernan, Kevin, Yusuke Imanishi & Masaru Honda
2018. Showcasing the interaction of generative and emergent linguistic knowledge with case marker omission in spoken Japanese. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
Heffernan, Kevin & Yusuke Hiratuka
2017. Morphological relative frequency impedes the use of stylistic variants. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 3:2  pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Satyanath, Shobha
2017. Editorial. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 3:2  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue