Article In: Applied Pragmatics: Online-First Articles
Investigating self-perceptions of speech act performance via retrospective verbal reports
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Adopting retrospective verbal reports (RVRs) as the data collection instrument, this study investigates native English-speaking (NES) and English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) speakers’ perceptions of their performances of major speech acts (i.e., requests, apologies, and refusals). Each of the 12 college students (6 NESs in U.S. and 6 EFLs in China) completed six role plays (two on each speech act). An RVR was administered immediately after each role play to capture participants’ thoughts during the speech act performance. The results showed that the participants shared the same intentions in some situations but differed in others. Both groups reported attending to linguistic aspects such as vocabulary and pronunciation. Whereas EFLs emphasized the cultural/language influences on their performances, NESs stressed the issue of politeness. The participants demonstrated a variety of multisequence steps while planning for their role plays. Although no EFL indicated satisfaction in their self-evaluations, NESs were mostly satisfied with their performances. NESs also had more sociopragmatic references, while EFLs almost exclusively focused on pragmalinguistics. This study provides multifaceted information on the perceptions of L1 and L2 speakers while executing the same sets of speech acts and warrants the need to introduce social factors into L2 pragmatic instruction for beginners.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Pragmalinguistics and sociopragmatics
- 2.2An overview of verbal reports
- 2.3Pragmatic studies using retrospective verbal reports (RVRs)
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Situational role plays
- 3.3Retrospective verbal reports
- 3.4Procedures
- 3.5Data analysis
- 3.6Interrater reliability
- 4.Results
- 4.1Cognitive processes of speech act performances
- 4.1.1Intentions
- 4.1.2Cognitions
- 4.1.3Planning
- 4.1.4Evaluations
- 4.2Pragmalinguistic vs. sociopragmatic references
- 4.1Cognitive processes of speech act performances
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Note
- Author queries
References
References (23)
Bialystok, E. (1993). Symbolic representation and attentional control in pragmatic competence. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 43–57). Oxford University Press.
Chen, Y. (2015). Chinese learners’ cognitive processes in writing email requests to faculty. System, 521, 51–62.
Cheng, D. (2017). Students’ self-perceptions of apologies to instructors. Language Awareness, 26(4), 261–281.
Cohen, A. D. (1996). Verbal reports as a source of insights into second language learner strategies. Applied Language Learning, 7 (1–2): 5–24.
(2012). Verbal report. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 6085–6089). Wiley-Blackwell.
Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1993). The production of speech acts by EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 271, 33–56.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2008). Perceptions of refusals to invitations: Exploring the minds of foreign language learners. Language Awareness, 171, 195–211.
(2010). Data collection methods in speech act performance. In A. Martínez-Flor & E. Uso-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 41–56). John Benjamins.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Routledge.
Hassall, T. (2008). Pragmatic performance: What are learners thinking? In E. Alcón Soler & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 72–93). Multilingual Matters.
Ren, W. (2014). A longitudinal investigation into L2 learners’ cognitive processes during study abroad. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 575–594.
Robinson, M. (1992). Introspective methodology in interlanguage pragmatics research. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Japanese as native and target language (Technical Report #3) (pp. 27–82). University of Hawai‘i Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Vacas Matos, M., & Cohen, A. D. (2021). Native-like performance of pragmatic features: Speech acts in Spanish. Contrastive Pragmatics, 31, 222–251.
van Compernolle, R. A. (2014). Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Multilingual Matters.
Widjaja, C. (1997). A study of date refusal: Taiwanese females vs. American females. University of Hawai‘i Working Papers in ESL, 15(2), 1–43. [URL]
Woodfield, H. (2008). Problematising discourse completion tasks: Voices from verbal report. Evaluation & Research in Education, 21(1), 43–69.
(2010). What lies beneath: Verbal report in interlanguage requests in English. Multilingua, 29(1), 1–27.
(2012). Pragmatic variation in learner perception: The role of retrospective verbal report in L2 speech act research. In J. C. Felix-Brasdefer & D. A. Koike (Eds.), Pragmatic variation in first and second language contexts: Methodological issues (pp. 209–223). John Benjamins.