Article published In: Trends in Second Language Pragmatics Research Part 2
[Applied Pragmatics 6:2] 2024
► pp. 182–195
Thematic article
Mixed methods research in L2 pragmatics
Published online: 7 February 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00026.you
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00026.you
Abstract
In this article, I discuss current research issues and practices in second language (L2) pragmatics research, focusing on how mixed methods are applied in the existing literature. The paper begins by introducing fundamental principles and three core mixed methods approaches, in each case synthesizing unique characteristics in terms of the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods and data interpretation. A critical review of different mixed methods approaches intends to help readers understand the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and make a principled decision. I then provide an overview of the recent trend in applying mixed methods in L2 pragmatics research, examining research purposes and the type of mixed methods designs utilized. I also offer an in-depth discussion of exemplary L2 pragmatics research that employed mixed methods focusing on underlying rationales for using the mixed methods and ways to achieve high degrees of integration at various stages of the study. The paper concludes with challenges in applying mixed methods and suggestions on how to advance the current practice of mixed methods in L2 pragmatics in future research.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Types of mixed methods research
- 3.Survey of current literature on L2 pragmatics research using mixed methods
- 4.Conclusion and future directions for mixed methods L2 pragmatics research
References
References (32)
Alcón-Soler, E., & Safont, P. (2018). Editors’ introduction to mixed method approaches in investigating pragmatic learning. System, 751, 1–3.
Barón, J., Celaya, M. L., & Levkina, M. (2020). Learning pragmatics through tasks: When interaction plays a role. Applied Pragmatics, 21, 1–25.
Black, E., & Barron, A. (2018). Learner pragmatics at the discourse level: Staying “on topic” in a telecollaborative eTandem task. System, 751, 33–47.
Chen, S. (2021). Development and validation of a web-based L2 pragmatic speaking test in the university context. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Northern Arizona University.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Dai, D. W. (2022). Design and validation of an L2-Chinese interactional competence test. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Melbourne.
Gesuato, S. (2018). Mixed methods in raising sociopragmatic awareness: A proposal for combining insights from the teacher’s feedback and the interlocutor’s point of view. System, 751, 48–67.
Greene, J. C. (2006). Toward a methodology of mixed methods social inquiry. Research in the Schools, 131, 93–98.
Hashimoto, B. J., & Nelson, K. (2020). Using a corpus in creating and evaluating a DCT. Applied Pragmatics, 21, 80–120.
Ikeda, N. (2021). Assessing L2 learners’ pragmatic ability in problem-solving situations at English-medium university. Applied Pragmatics, 31, 51–83.
Lin, M-F., & Wang, Y-F. (2020). Effects of pragmatic instruction on EFL teenagers’ apologetic email writing: Comprehension, production, and cognitive processes. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 601, 759–797.
Martín-Laguna, S., & Alcón-Soler, E. (2018). Development of discourse-pragmatic markers in a multilingual classroom: A mixed method research approach. System, 751, 68–80.
Nguyen, M. T. T., & Pham, T. T. T. (2022). Instructional effects of L2 pragmatic comprehension: The case of indirect refusals and indirect opinions. The Language Learning Journal, 501, 427–442.
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2018). Pragmatic development in the instructed context: A longitudinal investigation of L2 email requests. Pragmatics, 281, 217–252.
Nicholas, A. (2020). Dynamic assessment and requesting: Assessing the development of Japanese EFL learners’ oral requesting performance interactively. Intercultural Pragmatics, 171, 545–575.
Ockey, G., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2021). Human versus computer partner in the paired oral discussion test. Applied Linguistics, 421, 924–944.
Portolés, L., & Safont, P. (2018). Examining authentic and elicited data from a multilingual perspective. The real picture of child requestive behavior in the L3 classroom. System, 751, 81–92.
Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 471, 135–173.
Roever, C. & Ikeda, N. (2022). What scores from monologic speaking tests can(not) tell us about interactional competence. Language Testing, 391, 7–29.
Ross, S. J., & Hong, Y. (2019). Mixed methods in L2 pragmatics research. In N. Taguchi (Ed.). The routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 212–225). Routledge.
Sánchez-Hernández, A. (2018). A mixed-methods study of the impact of sociocultural adaptation on the development of pragmatic production. System, 751, 93–105.
Taguchi, N. (2018). Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. System, 751, 23–32.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavior research. Sage.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3–50). Sage.
(2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 131, 12–28.
Timpe-Laughlin, V., & Dombi, J. (2020). Exploring L2 learners’ request behavior in a multi-turn conversation with a fully automated agent. Intercultural Pragmatics, 171, 221–257.
Yang, H., & Ren, W. (2019). Pragmatic awareness and second language learning motivation: A mixed-methods investigation. Pragmatics & Cognition, 261, 447–473.
Youn, S. J. (2023). Grammar as validity evidence for assessing L2 interactional competence: The case of requests in role-play interaction. Applied Pragmatics, 51, 174–201.