Cover not available

Commentary published In: Describing and assessing interactional competence in a second language: Special issue of the journal of Applied Pragmatics 5:2 (2023)
Edited by Emma Betz, Taiane Malabarba and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
[Applied Pragmatics 5:2] 2023
► pp. 234239

References (13)
References
Couper–Kuhlen, E. (2014). What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics, 24(3), 623–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper–Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., et al. (2015). Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLOS ONE, 10(9). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J. (2014). Language presupposes an enchronic infrastructure for social interaction. In D. Dor, C. Knight, & J. Lewis (Eds.), The social origins of language (pp. 92–104). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, J. K. (2018). From interactional competence to interactional repertoires: Reconceptualizing the goal of L2 learning. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 25–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). The contributions of conversation analysis and interactional linguistics to a usage-based understanding of language: Expanding the transdisciplinary framework. The Modern Language Journal, 103(51), (supplement), 80–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. (2017). Using conversation analysis in the lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (2006). On the human ‘Interaction Engine’. In N. J. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 39–69). Berg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 51–77). Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In by N. J. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 70–96). Berg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2019). The dual personality of ‘topic’ in the IELTS Speaking Test. ELT Journal, 73(3), 247–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue