Cover not available

Article published In: Describing and assessing interactional competence in a second language: Special issue of the journal of Applied Pragmatics 5:2 (2023)
Edited by Emma Betz, Taiane Malabarba and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
[Applied Pragmatics 5:2] 2023
► pp. 208–233

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Assessing interactional competence

Exploring ratability challenges

ORCiD logo with link | University of Glasgow
ORCiD logo with link | Cambridge University Press and Assessment
ORCiD logo with link | CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire
ORCiD logo with link | Queensland University of Technology
Published online: 13 February 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00014.lam
Abstract
This paper is positioned at the interface of second/foreign language (L2) assessment and Conversation Analysis-Second Language Acquisition (CA-SLA). It explores challenges of ratability in assessing interactional competence (IC) from three dimensions: an overview of the conceptual and terminological convergence/divergence in the CA-SLA and L2 assessment literature, a micro-analytic Conversation Analysis of test-taker interactions, and the operationalisation of IC construct features in rating scales across assessment contexts. It draws insights from these dimensions into a discussion of the nature of the IC construct and the challenges of IC ratability, and concludes with suggestions on ways in which insights from CA research can contribute to addressing these issues.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.IC in CA-SLA and L2 assessment: A synthesis of terminological orientations
  • 3.A microanalytic approach to IC in test-taker interactions
  • 4.IC constructs featured in speaking assessment scales
    • 4.1Overall trends
    • 4.2Cambridge C1 Advanced Speaking test
    • 4.3Spanish 1 Final Oral test
  • 5.Discussion: The nature of the IC construct and ratability challenges
    • 5.1Interactional competence: Shared or individual?
    • 5.2Interactional competence: Meaning-making through diverse semiotic systems
    • 5.3Interactional competence: High- vs. low-inference features
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Auer, P., & Zima, E. (2021). On word searches, gaze, and co-participation. Gesprächsforschung, 221, 390–425.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, G., & Anstey, M. (2010). Evolving pedagogies: Reading and writing in a multimodal world. Education Services Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burch, A. R., & Kley, K. (2020). Assessing interactional competence: The role of intersubjectivity in a paired-speaking assessment task. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9(1), 25–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2001). Common european framework of references for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, L. & Papageorgiou, S. (2021). Complementary strengths? Evaluation of a hybrid human-machine scoring approach for a test of oral academic English. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(4), 437–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducasse, A. M. (2010). Interaction in paired oral proficiency assessment in Spanish. Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fulcher, G. (1993). The construction and validation of rating scales for oral tests in English as a foreign language [unpublished PhD thesis]. Lancaster University.
(2010). Practical Language Testing. Hodder Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galaczi, E. D. (2008). Peer-peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the first certificate in English examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(2), 89–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests?. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553–574. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galaczi, E. D., & Taylor, L. (2018). Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 219–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gan, Z. (2010). Interaction in group oral assessment: A case study of higher- and lower-scoring students. Language Testing, 27(4), 585–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gan, Z., Davison, C., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2009). Topic negotiation in peer group oral assessment situations: A conversation analytic approach. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 315–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, J. K. (2018). From L2 interactional competence to L2 interactional repertoires: Reconceptualising the objects of L2 learning. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 25–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, J. K., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2011). L2 interactional competence and development. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 Interactional Competence and Development (pp. 1–18). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hırçın Çoban, M., & Sert, O. (2020). Resolving interactional troubles and maintaining progressivity in paired speaking assessment in an EFL context. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9(1), 64–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1999). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ikeda, N. (2017). Measuring L2 oral pragmatic abilities for use in social contexts: Development and validation of an assessment instrument for L2 pragmatics performance in university settings [unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Melbourne.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.13–31). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. & Parra, I. (2003). Multiple layers of meaning in an oral proficiency test: The complementary roles of nonverbal, paralinguistic, and verbal behaviors in assessment decisions. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 90–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lam, D. M. K. (2021). Don’t turn a deaf ear: A case for assessing interactive listening. Applied Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazaraton, A. (2002). A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
May, L. (2011). Interactional competence in a paired speaking test: Features salient to raters. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2), 127–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNamara, T. F., & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakatsuhara, F. (2013). The co-construction of conversation in group oral tests. Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakatsuhara, F., May, L., Lam, D., & Galaczi, E. D. (2018). Learning-oriented feedback in the development and assessment of interactional competence. Research Notes, 701, 1–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. T. (2019). Deepening roots and broadening horizons in interactional competence research and praxis. In M. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence (pp. 397–412). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ockey, G. J., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2021). Human versus computer partner in the paired oral discussion test. Applied Linguistics [Advance articles], 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018). Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 3–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). On the nature and the development of L2 interactional competence. In M. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence (pp. 25–59). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E. (2018). L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roever, C., & Kasper, G. (2018). Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, 35(3), 331–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1987). On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 54–69). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P., & Satar, M. (2021). The Rashomon effect: which features of a speaker’s talk do listeners notice? Classroom Discourse. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svennevig, J. (1999). Getting acquainted in conversation: A study of initial interactions. John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UCLES (2019). C1 advanced: Handbook for teachers. Retrieved from: [URL]
Upshur, J. A., & Turner, C. E. (1995). Constructing rating scales for second language tests. ELT Journal, 49(1), 3–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Moere, A. (2012). A psycholinguistic approach to oral language assessment. Language Testing, 29(3), 325–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waring, H. Z. (2018). Teaching L2 interactional competence: Problems and possibilities. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 57–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Developing interactional competence with limited linguistic resources. In M. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence (pp. 215–227). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, J. (2014). Displaying status of recipiency through reactive tokens in Mandarin task-oriented interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 741, 33–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Youn, S. J. (2015). Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32(2), 199–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Youn, S. J., & Burch, A. R. (2020). Where Conversation Analysis meets Language Assessment: Toward expanding epistemologies and validity evidence. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9(1), iii–xvii.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, R. F. (2008). Language and interaction: An advanced resource book. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

de Jong, Nivja H., Stephan Raaijmakers & Dineke Tigelaar
2025. Developing high-quality, practical, and ethical automated L2 speaking assessments. System 134 ► pp. 103796 ff. DOI logo
Glasson, Nicholas & Katherine Halley
2025. Less talk, more action? Exploring proficiency scores and embodied resources in online L2 interactions. Classroom Discourse 16:3 ► pp. 318 ff. DOI logo
Glasson, Nicholas & Daniel M.K. Lam
2025. Can you quantify the qualitative? Developing a coding and video annotation method for L2 interaction. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 4:3 ► pp. 100283 ff. DOI logo
Karatay, Yasin & Jing Xu
2025. Exploring the Potential of Conversational AI for Assessing Second Language Oral Proficiency. TESOL Quarterly DOI logo
Ma, Lina
2025. Book review: Assessing Interactional Competence: Principles, Test Development and Validation through an L2 Chinese IC Test DaiDavid Wei. Assessing Interactional Competence: Principles, Test Development and Validation through an L2 Chinese IC Test. Peter Lang, 2024. 440 pp. ISBN 9783631882504 (Hardcover) £69, E-book gold open access (free to download). Language Testing DOI logo
Stephenson, Michael & Christopher Leyland
2025. Group-based assessments and L2 interactional competence: test-takers’ practices for re-aligning to the assessment task. Language and Education 39:6 ► pp. 1490 ff. DOI logo
Dai, David Wei & Michael Davey
2024. On the Promise of Using Membership Categorization Analysis to Investigate Interactional Competence. Applied Linguistics 45:4 ► pp. 573 ff. DOI logo
Gokturk, Nazlinur & Evgeny Chukharev
2024. Exploring the Potential of a Spoken Dialog System-Delivered Paired Discussion Task for Assessing Interactional Competence. Language Assessment Quarterly 21:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Hye-won, Andrew Mullooly, Amy Devine & Evelina Galaczi
2024. Exploring Interaction in Video-call Paired Speaking Tests: A Look at Scores, Language, and Perceptions. Applied Linguistics 45:3 ► pp. 533 ff. DOI logo
Uyar, Gülşah & Ufuk Balaman
2024. The Role of Gazing Behaviors in Navigating Paired Role-Play Interactional Competence Assessment Tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly 21:3 ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Vonen, Maria Njølstad
2024. Teachers’ management of students’ incorrect answers in oral examinations. Linguistics and Education 80 ► pp. 101266 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Wei & Meng Yeh
2024. Assessing interactive listening in beginning-level L2 Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA 59:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue