Article published In: Proper Names:
Edited by Chia-Jung Pan and Yang Huang
[Asian Languages and Linguistics 6:1] 2025
► pp. 183–202
Proper names in Khorchin Mongolian
Taxonomy, definiteness and plurality
Published online: 19 August 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.25007.he
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.25007.he
Abstract
This paper discusses the taxonomy of proper names and analyses the grammatical features of proper names in
Khorchin Mongolian. We argue that (i) although proper names in Khorchin Mongolian are inherent definite, but they can be coerced
with an indefinite reading when combining with the indefinite article nək in existential sentences. In addition,
proper names can also combine with demonstratives to derive complex expressions like “Dem+Proper name”, which express the
speaker’s subjective attitude, such as derogation or contempt; (ii) when attached to proper names, the additive plural marker
-ut can convey associative plural meaning, and when added to proper names, the additive plural marker
-tʃut can also convey a collective meaning, referring to a specific ethnic group or tribe.
Keywords: Khorchin Mongolian, proper names, definiteness, plurality
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Classification of proper names in Khorchin Mongolian
- 2.1Names for humans
- 2.2Place names and names of administrative divisions
- 2.3Names of rivers and mountains
- 2.4Names of five livestock (五畜)
- 3.Definiteness of proper names
- 3.1Bare form of proper names
- 3.2Demonstratives + proper names
- 4.Proper names and plurality
- 4.1Additive meaning for plural proper names
- 4.2Associative plural meaning for proper names
- 4.3Collective meaning for plural names
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (21)
Colman, Fran. (2014). The
Grammar of Names in Anglo-Saxon England: The Linguistics and Culture of the Old English
Onomasticon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daniel, Michael & Edith Moravcsik. (2013). The
associative plural. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). The
World Atlas of Language Structures Online. [URL]
Fraurud, Kari. (2000). Proper
names and gender in Swedish. In Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Mirja Saari (eds.), Gender
in Grammar and Cognition, 167–220. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garudi. (2001). Orčin Čaγ-un Mongγol Kele
[Modern Mongolian]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolian Education Press.
Greenberg, J. H. (1972). Numeral
classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working
Papers on Language Universals 9,Stanford
University. pp 1–39.
He, Ruyi. (2023). Kind-denoting
and generic nominal phrases in Mongolian — with a discussion on associative plural constructions as a kind-denoting and
generic Device. Minority Languages of
China 11:43–54.
Kripke, Saul A. (1980). Preface to “Naming and
necessity.” In Naming and
Necessity. Harvard University Press. pp 1–21.
Li, Xuping. (2020). On
YOU-existentials and existential propositionsin Chinese. Contemporary
Linguistics 21: 182–198.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. (1996). The
Syntax of N-raising: a minimalist theory, OTS Working
Papers. Utrecht.
Qinggertai. (1991). Mengguyu
Yufa [Mongolian
grammar]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolian People’s Publishing House.
Tumenjirgal. (2009). Odo
Űye-yin Mongγol Kele [Modern
Mongolian]. Hohhot: Inner-Mongolian University Press.
Van de Velde, Mark & Odette Ambouroue. (2011). The
grammar of Orungu proper names. Journal of African Languages and
Linguistics 231: 113–141.
Van Langendonck, Willy. (2007
a). Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin·New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Von Heusinger, Klaus & Johannes Wespel. (2007). Indefinite
proper names and quantification over manifestations. In E. Puig-Waldmüller (ed.), Proceedings
of Sinn und
Bedeutung 111: 332–345. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Xu, Siriguleng. (2014). The
ethnology study of changes in Mongolian names. Mater thesis of Northwest Minzu University.
