Article published In: Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 6:2 (2025) ► pp.253–285
Mirror principle and split VoiceP
Evidence from Mongolian and Japanese
Published online: 29 January 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.24023.bai
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.24023.bai
Abstract
This paper demonstrates that the layered affixation of passive and causative morphemes in Mongolian and Japanese mirrors the Split VoiceP structure of passive and causative clauses, where the affixation of a voice suffix signals the introduction of an argument by a voice head spelled out by that suffix. This head-argument correlation, ensuring the morpho-syntax mirroring of voice suffixes, entails that the voice domain comprises separate projections that are split out of VoiceP. Clauses are built by introducing arguments as potential subjects (sbjs) through voice heads of the same substance, where a last-introduced sbj is promoted to the nominative position, with others, if any, remaining non-nominative within the voice domain. From this, it follows that Voice is a sbj-introducing, not merely argument-introducing, head, and that the interconnection of passives and causatives as voice constructions lies in the fact that both are derived over the Split VoiceP structure. Consequently, voice constructions can be accounted for in a unified way, without the need of postulating dedicated heads such as Passive and Cause, and the clause building mode is reducible to introduction of arguments as sbjs, which ultimately comes down to Free Merge.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The empirical base: The passive-causative interaction
- 2.1Mongolian
- 2.2Japanese
- 2.3Interim summary
- 3.Affixing order complying with Mirror Principle
- 4.Split VoiceP
- 5.Conclusion and discussion
- Notes
- The following abbreviations are used in this paper
References
References (37)
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Florian Schäfer. (2015). External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach. Oxford University Press.
. (2018). Passive. In Norbert Hornstein, Howard Lasnik, Pritty Patel-Grosz, and Charles Yang (eds.), Syntactic Structures after 60 Years, 403–425. Mouton de Gruyter.
Aoyagi, Hiroshi. (2021). On the causative and passive morphology in Japanese and Korean. Open Linguistics, 2021 (7), 87–110.
Bai, Chigchi and Siyang Xia. (2025). A Simpler Syntax of Middles, Unaccusatives and (Fake) Passives. Talk presented at The 18th International Spring Forum of English Linguistics (Available at [URL]).
Baker, Mark. (1985). The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16 (3), 373–415.
Bao, Chunmei, Chigchi Bai, and Togtambayar Wu. (2025). A Unified Account of Passives and Causatives: The Case of Mongolian and Japanese. To appear in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics).
. (2015). Problems of projection: Extensions. In Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann, and Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honor of Adriana Belletti, 3–16. John Benjamins.
Dixon, R. M. W. (2000). A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, 30–83. MIT Press.
Haider, Hubert. (2024). ONE GRAMMAR IN 7.164 VARIANTS — Confessions of a veteran syntactician. [URL]
Harley, Heidi. (2008). On the causative construction. In Shigeru Miyagawa and Mamoru Saito (eds.), Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 20–53. Oxford University Press.
. (2013). External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua, 1251, 34–57.
Hashimoto, Kunihito. (2019). The different meanings of causative sentences in Mongolian (in Japanese). Journal of Language and Culture of Hokkaido, 171, 141–188.
Hoshi, Hiroko. (1999). Passives. In Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 191–235. Blackwell.
Janhunen, Juha. (2012). Mongolian. John Benjamins.
Kratzer, Angelika. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In Rooryck Johan and Zaring Laurie (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, 109–137. Kluwer.
Kubo, Miori. (1992). Japanese passives. In Working Papers of the Department of Languages and Cultures, 231, 231–302. University of Hokkaido.
Kuroda, Shigeyuki. (1993). Lexical and productive causatives in Japanese: An examination of the theory of paradigmatic structure. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 151, 1–81.
Legate, Julie Anne. (2003). Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry, 341, 506–515.
. (1998). (S)ase as an elsewhere causative and the syntactic nature of words. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 161, 67–110.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. (1976). The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, 1–39. Academic Press.
Umetani, Hiroyuki. (2006). Serial use of the passive and causative suffixes in Mongolian. In Kato Shigehiro and Yoshida Hiromi (eds.), Gengo Kenkyuu no Shyatei, 83–102. Sanbi Insatu.
