Article published In: Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 4:1 (2023) ► pp.76–100
What makes the blocking effect happen?
Published online: 6 July 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.22015.li
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.22015.li
Abstract
This study illustrates that for the Chinese bare form reflexive ziji ‘self’, feature conflicts can cause both the local binding blocking effect and the long-distance binding blocking effect. To make long-distance binding possible, a feature-matching requirement between the long-distance antecedent and the reindexed local reflexive must be met, as proposed by Tang, C.-C. Jane. (1989). Chinese reflexives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7(1), 93–121. . In addition to this, a feature-matching requirement between the verb and its subject and object must also be satisfied, with the latter likely having a suppressive effect on the former. Further research is needed to understand the interaction of these two feature-matching requirements and what constraints exist. Furthermore, the blocking effect can be triggered by a variety of factors, including syntax, feature agreement, pragmatics, discourse prominence, animacy and thematic conditions and other combined effects. Ziji’s odd performance might be the result of their joint efforts. We need to further clarify how these factors work together.
Article outline
- 1.Long distance reflexive ziji as a violation of Principle A of Binding Theory
- 2.Why is long-distance binding possible?
- 3.Binding Theory Principle A or local binding blocking effect
- 4.Another type of long-distance blocking effect
- 5.Chinese bare form reflexive ziji in Ba and Bei sentences
- 6.Discussion
- Notes
- Abbreviations and gloss conventions used
References
References (22)
Cole, Peter., & Wang, Chengchi. (1996). Antecedents and blockers of long-distance reflexives: The case of Chinese ziji. Linguistic Inquiry, 27(3), 357–390.
Hu, Jianhua. (2019). Prominence and locality in grammar: The syntax and semantics of wh-questions and reflexives (1st ed., Vol. 11). Routledge.
Hu, Jianhua., & Pan, Haihua. (2002). NP显著性的计算与汉语反身代词“自己”的指称NP [Prominence and the Chinese reflexive ziji]. Dang Dai Yu Yan Xue 当代语言学, 4(1), 46–60.
Huang, C.-T. James. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4), 531–574.
Huang, C.-T. James., & Liu, C.-S. Luther. (2001). Logophoricity, attitudes, and ziji at the interface. In Cole, Peter., Hermon, Gabriella., & Huang, C.-T. James. (Eds.), Long distance reflexives, Syntax and Semantics 33 (pp. 141–195). Academic Press.
Huang, C.-T. James., & Tang, C.-C. Jane. (1991). The local nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese. In Koster, Jan., & Reuland, Eric. (Eds.), Long-Distance Anaphora (pp. 263–282). Cambridge University Press.
Huang, C.-T. James., & Li, Yen-hui. Audrey., & Li, Yafei. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
Huang, Yan. (1994). The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
Jin, Zhonghao. (2003a). 略谈动词对 “自己”长距离约束的制约作用 [Verb restraint function to long distance binding of ziji]. Han Yu Xue Xi 汉语学习 41, 9–12.
. (2003b). 现代汉语中“自己”位于主宾语位置上的照应关系研究 [A study on the anaphoric relation of ziji as subjects or objects in modern Chinese]. Doctoral dissertation, Peking University.
Kuno, Susumu. (1972). Pronominalization, reflexivization, and direct discourse. Linguistic Inquiry, 3(2), 161–195.
. (2001). Why the blocking effect? In Cole, Peter., & Hermon, Gabriella., & Huang, C.-T. James. (Eds.), Long-distance reflexives, Syntax and Semantics 33 (pp. 279–316). Academic Press.
Wang, Yingying., & Pan, Haihua. (2014). A note on the non-de se interpretation of attitude reports. Language (Baltimore), 90(3), 746–754.
. (2015). Empathy and Chinese long distance reflexive ziji – remarks on Giorgi (2006, 2007). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(1), 307–322.
. (2021). Chinese Reflexives. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. (pp. 1–38). Oxford University Press.