Article published In: Classifiers
Edited by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
[Asian Languages and Linguistics 3:2] 2022
► pp. 181–201
Classifiers in Dimasa and (in-)definite marking
Published online: 26 January 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.22007.eva
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.22007.eva
Abstract
Dimasa (ISO 639-3 dis) is a Bodo-Garo language within the Tibeto-Burman family of languages. Like other Tibeto-Burman languages of Northeast India, it has a system of numeral classifiers which occur prefixed to their respective numerals. Across the dozen or so languages of Bodo-Garo, it has been noted that the classifier-numeral word can be placed either before or after the counted noun. The existence of numeral classifiers, as well as the clf-num order may have arisen in this area due to contact with Tai languages during the Ahom kingdom period from the 1200’s to 1800’s. In the Tai languages, classifiers precede the number “one”. By comparing occurrences of classifiers in Dimasa texts, it can be seen that the order N clf-num corresponds to definite nouns, while the order clf-num n marks indefinites. In addition to classifier placement, Dimasa definiteness is also marked by demonstratives, case marking, topic marking, and/or combinations of these strategies.
Keywords: Bodo-Garo, constituent order, definite, indefinite
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and overview of Dimasa
- 2.Counted nouns and classifiers
- 3.Classifier placement and (in-)definiteness
- 4.Summary
- Acknowledgements
- Note
- Abbreviations
References
References (25)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. Y. Forthcoming. A guide to gender and classifiers. Oxford University Press
Barz, R. K., and Diller, A. V. (1985). Classifiers and standardisation: some South and South-East Asian comparisons. Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 9: Language policy, language planning and sociolinguistics in South-East Asia. Pacific Linguistics.
DeLancey, Scott. (2011). “Optional” “ergativity” in Tibeto-Burman languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 34(2), 9–20.
Dixon, Robert M. W. (2003). Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27(1), 61–112.
Evans, Jonathan P. (2022). Classifiers before numerals: Origin of an atypical morpheme order. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 45(1), 1–21.
Evans, Jonathan P., and Langthasa, Dhrubajit. (2023). Dimasa language: structure and texts. Language and Linguistics.
Haokip, Pauthang, and Daimalu Brahma. (2018). Differential Case Marking in Bodo. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 11(1), i–xiv.
Hyslop, Gwendolyn. (2008). Newar Classifiers: A summary of the literature. Newah Vijaanan (Journal of Newar Studies) 61, 28–41.
Jacquesson, F. and van Breugel, S. (2017). The linguistic reconstruction of the past: The case of the Boro-Garo languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 40(1), 90–122.
Li, Xuping, and Bisang, Walter. (2012). Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking. Lingua, 122(4), 335–355.
Langthasa, Dhrubajit, and Evans, Jonathan P. (2018). Numeral Classifier and Word Order in Dimasa and Bodo-Garo. In Proceedings of the 51st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
Malone, Terry. (2004). Classifiers in Chimila (Chibchan). Nominal classification, Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 57(2/3), 117–143.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Hotz, Rolf
Li, Yu
2025. The definiteness marking on proper names in Zauzou. Asian Languages and Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 98 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
