Cover not available

Article published In: Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 2:1 (2021) ► pp.24–35

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

On the etymology of the Japanese plural suffix and its possible connection to Korean

 | Furman University
Published online: 30 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.21005.fra
Abstract
This paper presents an etymological analysis of the Japanese plural suffix tachi, Old Japanese tati. I propose that tati originates from a grammaticalization of an earlier Pre-Old Japanese phonological form *totwi, the non-bound reflex of which is the Old Japanese quasi-collective marker dwoti ‘fellow (person), everyone, together’. The reconstruction of a Pre-Old Japanese stem *totwi (Pre-Proto-Japanese /*tətəj/) with quasi-collective and plural function clarifies the possible connection of the Japanese plural suffix to the Korean plural suffix tul (Middle Korean tólh), which Whitman (Whitman, John. (1985). The Phonological Basis for the Comparison of Japanese and Korean. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, p. 217) proposed to be cognates but which has since been criticized on phonological and distributional grounds. I show that reconstructing the earliest form of the Japanese plural suffix as /*tətəj/ resolves each of the three phonological issues with the Japano-Koreanic comparison, creates a better morphosyntactic match between the two languages, and rules out a loanword relationship of the Japanese and Korean forms.
Article outline
  • 1.The plural suffix in Japanese
  • 2.Comparison of OJ tati to Korean
    • 2.1Proposal
  • 3.Analysis of OJ dwoti
  • 4.A unified etymology of dwoti and tati
  • 5.The comparison to MK tólh, revisited
    • 5.1Addressing problems in the Japano-Koreanic etymology
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (16)
References
Francis-Ratte, Alexander. (2016). Proto-Korean-Japanese: a new reconstruction of the common origin of the Japanese and Korean languages. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2017). Lexical recycling as a lens onto shared Japano-Koreanic agriculture. In Martine Robbeets and Alexander Savelyev (Eds.), Language Dispersal Beyond Farming (pp. 75–92). Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke. (2010). A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iljic, Robert, and Luo, Yi. (2001). The problem of the suffix -men in Chinese grammar / 汉语语法中词尾 “们” 的几个问题. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 29, 1, 11–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, Andrew, Ko, Seongyeon, and Whitman, John. (2020). A comparative approach to the vowel systems and harmonies in the Transeurasian languages and beyond. In Martine Robbeets and Alexander Savelyev (Eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages (pp. 486–510). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Wha. (2009). The Syntax of the Plural Marker -tul and Classifiers in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 341, 829–852. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-moon, and Ramsey, S. Robert. (2011). A History of the Korean Language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. (1966). Lexical Evidence Relating Korean to Japanese. Language, 42, 2, 185–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nam, Kwangwu. (1997). Ko’eosajeon [Dictionary of Classical Korean]. Donga Publishing (Seoul).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics. (2020). Oxford-NINJAL Corpus of Old Japanese (Version 2020.1) [URL] (accessed November 2020).
Omodaka, Hisataka et al. (1967). Jidaibetsu kokugo daijiten: Jōdaihen [Great dictionary of Japanese language by period: Ancient edition]. Sanseidō (Tōkyō).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine. (2007). Is Japanese related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic? Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. (1997). The so-called Plural Copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus. Journal of Pragmatics 271, 203–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vovin, Alexander. (2010). Koreo-Japonica: A Re-evaluation of a Common Genetic Origin. University of Hawaiʻi Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitman, John. (1985). The Phonological Basis for the Comparison of Japanese and Korean. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). The Relationship Between Japanese and Korean. In Nicholas Tranter (Ed.), The languages of Japan and Korea (pp. 24–38). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Lee, Kiri & Young-mee Yu Cho
2023. Grammaticalization in progress. Asian Languages and Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Yurayong, Chingduang & Erika Sandman
2023. Chinese Word Order in the Comparative Sino-Tibetan and Sociotypological Contexts. Languages 8:2 ► pp. 112 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue