Article published In: Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 2:2 (2021) ► pp.292–317
A corpus-based study of successive patterns of Chinese modals
Published online: 27 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.21001.zho
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.21001.zho
Abstract
Being different from previous researches which explore the possible multiple modal patterns in Mandarin Chinese basically with invented examples, this study examines the attested patterns of successive use of modals facilitated by two large Chinese corpora (Corpus of Center for Chinese Linguistics Peking University or CCL, and Beijing Language and Culture University Corpus Center or BCC) and the reasons underlying these patterns. The data reveal that combinations of Chinese modals of different types comply with the proximity to the predicate verb of the proposition. The exact sequential order is demonstrated as follows: dynamic modality precedes the predicate verb; deontic modality precedes dynamic modality; and epistemic modality precedes deontic and dynamic modalities. In addition, different modal auxiliaries of the same type also co-occur in a special sequence. From the perspective of subjectivity and objectivity, we argue that the underlying principle of this ordering is that the more subjective a modal auxiliary is, the more distant it will be from the predicate verb of the proposition and vice versa. For successive patterns of different modal auxiliaries within the same type, the concept of gradability is employed. Although modal auxiliaries of the same type might occur at the same distance to the predicate verb of the proposition, they could characterize different degrees of gradabilities. Modals with higher degree of gradability could precede those with lower degrees, whereas those with the same degree of gradability are capable of the successive co-occurrence in either way.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Previous studies on successive use of modality
- 2.2Lin’s successive use of modality
- 2.3Subjective and objective modality
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Corpora analysis
- 3.2Data collection
- 3.3Results
- 4.Successive patterns of Chinese modals
- 4.1Successive use of modal auxiliaries of different types
- Epistemic modality preceding deontic modality
- Deontic modality preceding dynamic modality
- Epistemic modality preceding dynamic modality
- 4.2Successive use of modal auxiliaries within the same type
- Successive use of different epistemic modal auxiliaries
- Successive use of different deontic modal auxiliaries
- Successive use of different dynamic modal auxiliaries
- 4.1Successive use of modal auxiliaries of different types
- 5.Interpretation of successive patterns of Chinese modals
- 5.1Subjectivity and the successive use of modals of different types
- 5.2Gradability of subjectivity and the successive use of modals within the same type
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (31)
Andrew, Peters. (2016). Multiple modal constructions in Rural Chesapeake English and Mandarin Chinese. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 361, 1–19.
di Paolo, Marianna. (1989). Double modals as a single lexical item. American Speech, 64(3), 195–224.
Ellison, Gregory Campbell. (2007). You might shouldn’t say that: The cartographic syntax of English multiple modal constructions and its (speculative) history. Generative Grammar in Geneva, 51, 51–106.
Guo, Jiansheng. (1994). Social Interaction, Meaning and Grammatical Form: Children’s Development and use of Modal Auxiliaries in Mandarin Chinese. PhD Dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. (1970). Functional diversity in language, as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of language, 61, 322–361.
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Matthiessen, Christian Matthias Ingemar Martin. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th edn. London: Routledge.
Hasty, J. Daniel. (2012). We might should oughta take a second look at this: A syntactic re-analysis of double modals in Southern United States English. Lingua, 1221, 1716–1738.
Labov, William. (1972). Language and the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Li, Renzi. (2003). Modality in English and Chinese: a typological perspective. PhD dissertation. University of Antwerp.
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. (2012). Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics, 481, 151–186.
Song, Yonggui. (2007). On negation of modern Chinese modalities. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Suzuki, Daisuke. (2018). Variation between modal verbs in British English. Functions of Language,
25
(3), 392–412.
Tiee, Henry Hung-Yeh. (1985). Modality in Chinese. In Nam-Kil and Henry Hung-Yeh Tiee (eds.), Studies in East Linguistics (pp. 84–96). University of Southern California.
van der Auwera, Johan. & Plungian, Vladimir A. (1998). Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 21, 79–124.
van der Auwera, Johan., Peter, Kehayov, & Vittrant, Alice. (2009). Acquistive modals. In Hogeweg, I., de Hoop, H., & Malchukov, A. (eds.), Cross linguistic semantics of tense, aspect and modality (pp. 271–302). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
von Wright, Georg Henrik. (1951). An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Wang, Xiaohua. (2014). Similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese co-occurrence patterns. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 46(02), 202–213.
Wu, Yunli. (2018). The Co-occurrence of Epistemic Modal Verbs in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese Language Learning, 11: 39–49.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
