Article published In: Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 2:1 (2021) ► pp.1–23
Expanding the boundaries of Asian linguistics
Great Andamanese languages
Published online: 30 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.20031.com
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.20031.com
Abstract
While the general lines of the areal linguistic typology of Asia are well known, there are some less well
understood pockets that promise to throw light on the overall range of variation within the continent. These include the
indigenous languages of the Andaman Islands, which have for much of history stood apart from the population and language spreads
that have characterized most of Asia. They fall into two families: Great Andamanese – the focus of this article – and Ongan. In
some respects Great Andamanese languages go with the bulk of Asia, e.g. verb-final constituent order, but other aspects even of
constituent order represent a mixture that matches neither the general Asian head-final type nor the Southeast Asian head-initial
type. Some properties of Great Andamanese are typologically unusual, but do find presumably accidental parallels in languages
spoken inside Asia, e.g. retroflex consonants, or elsewhere, e.g. body-part prefixes and verb root ellipsis.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Verb–Object order in the languages of Asia, and the indigenous languages of the Andaman Islands
- 2.Other constituent order properties
- 3.Some other typological properties of Great Andamanese languages
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (36)
Arsenault, P. (2017). Retroflexion
in South Asia: typological, genetic, and areal patterns. Journal of South Asian Languages and
Linguistics, 41, 1–53.
Blevins, J. (2007). A
long lost sister of Proto-Austronesian? Proto-Ongan, mother of Jarawa and Onge of the Andaman
Islands. Oceanic
Linguistics, 461, 154–98.
Comrie, B. (2007). Areal
typology of mainland Southeast Asia: what we learn from the WALS
maps. In P. Kullavanijaya (Ed.), Trends
in Thai linguistics (= Manusya, Special Issue
13) (pp. 18–47). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Comrie, B., & Zamponi, R. (2017). Typological
profile of the Great Andamanese family. Journal of South Asian Languages and
Linguistics, 41, 55–83.
(2019a). Subgrouping
and lexical distance in the Great Andamanese family. In M. L. Kotin (Ed.), Wortschätze
und Sprachwelten: Beiträge zu Sprachtypologie, kontrastiver Wort- bzw. Wortschatzforschung und
Pragmatik (pp. 35–57). Berlin, etc.: Lang.
(2019b). Verb
Root Ellipsis. In M. Baerman, O. Bond & A. Hippisley (Eds.), Morphological
perspectives: Papers in honour of Greville G.
Corbett (pp. 233–280). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Dryer, M. S. (2007). Word
order. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language
typology and syntactic description. Vol. 1: Clause structure. 2nd
edn. (pp. 61–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2013a). Order
of adjective and noun. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed
on 2020-11-10.)
(2013b). Order
of adposition and noun phrase. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed
on 2020-11-10.)
(2013c). Order
of genitive and noun. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed
on 2020-11-10.)
(2013d). Order
of object and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed
on 2020-11-10.)
(2013e). Order
of relative clause and noun. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed
on 2020-11-10.)
(2013f). Relationship
between the order of object and verb and the order of adposition and noun
phrase. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed
on 2020-11-10.)
Hammarström, H., Forkel, R., Haspelmath, M., & Bank, S. (2020). Glottolog
4.3. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. (Available online at [URL], Accessed on 2020-11-10.)
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Comrie, B., & Gil, D. (Eds.) (2005). The
world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kumar, P. (2012). Descriptive
and typological study of Jarawa. PhD thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
(2013). Absence
of common consonants. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed
on 2020-11-10.)
Man, E. H. (1919–1923). Dictionary
of the South Andaman language, Indian
Antiquary, 481 (1919) Supp. 1–84, 491 (1920) Supp. 85–136, 501 (1921) Supp. 137–64, 511 (1922) Supp. 165–88, 521 (1923) Supp. 189–203.
Moroz, G. (2017). lingtypology:
easy mapping for linguistic typology. [URL]
Piłsudski, B. (2011). Materials
for the study of the Orok (Uilta) language and folklore. In A. Majewicz (Ed.), The
collected works of Bronisław Piłsudski. Vol. 4: Materials for the study of Tungusic languages and
folklore (pp. 113–746). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
(1898). Notes
on the languages of the South Andaman group of
tribes. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and
environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Schapper, A., Huber, J., & van Engelenhoven, A. (2012). The
historical relation of the Papuan languages of Timor and
Kisar. In H. Hammarström & W. van den Heuvel (Eds.), History,
contact, and classification of Papuan languages. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia, Special
Issue 2012, 192–240.
Subbarao, K. V., & Kevichüsa, M. (1999). Internal
relative clauses in Tenyidie (Angami): a case of hierarchical precedence vs. linear
precedence. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area, 221, 149–181.
