Cover not available

Article published In: Asian Languages and Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2020) ► pp.71–106

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A root-and-pattern approach to word-formation in Chinese

 | Zhejiang University
 | Zhejiang University
Published online: 11 March 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.00003.che
Abstract
This paper argues that compounding, the major source of word-formation in Chinese, and the root-and-pattern system in Hebrew involve fundamentally the same syntactic operations and observe the same locality constraints, despite the salient differences. More specifically, it addresses the well-known continuum that the coordinate and attributive compounds behave more like words, whereas resultative and subordinate compounds are much more like phrases. It puts forward the idea that this continuum can be accounted for by assuming that there is a distinction between word-formation from roots and word-formation from words, with the former giving rise to more lexical properties and the latter more phrasal properties. The paper also discusses some related issues, such as the correct formulation of word-level phases and the structure of the major types of compound words in Chinese.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The continuum of lexicality in Chinese compound words
    • 2.1Coordinates
    • 2.2Attributive compounds
    • 2.3Resultative compounds
    • 2.4Subordinate compounds
    • 2.5Summary
  • 3.Theoretical issues
  • 4.The structure of Chinese compounds
    • 4.1Coordinate compounds
    • 4.2Attributive compounds
    • 4.3Resultative compounds
    • 4.4Subordinate compounds
    • 4.5The continuum of structural properties revisited
  • 5.More on phases
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (56)
References
Aikhenvald, Y. A. & Robert, M. W. D. (2006). Grammars in Contact – A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. & Terje, L. (2017). The structural configurations of root categorization. In L. Bauke & A. Blümel (Eds.), Labels and Roots: 203–232. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arad, M. (2003). Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: the case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 211: 737–778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morphosyntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1989). Object sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 201: 513–553.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bisetto, A. & Sergio, S. (2005). The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio, 4 (2): 319–332.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Taking Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brice, H. (2017). The root and word distinction: an experimental study of Hebrew denominal verbs. Morphology 271: 159–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cao, C. (2016). Xiandai Hanyu Pianyi Fuci Tanjiu [On Partially-directed Compound Words in Modern Chinese]. MA Thesis, Shanghai Normal University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Y. (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, G. & Yang, D. (2016). Hanyu dongjieshi fuheci de yuxu ji xiangguan wenti [Word order in Chinese VV compounds and related issues]. Zhongguo Yuwen 374 (5): 553–567.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, G. & Zhou, G. (2015). Verb-object compounding in Chinese: A Distributed Morphology approach. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 471: 163–175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger: 1-52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. Ms: MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Eds.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and Beyond (pp. 104–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, C. (1994). Topics in Ewe Syntax. Ph. D dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Multiple verb movement in ǂHoan. Linguistic Inquiry 331: 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dai, X. (1992). Chinese Morphology and its Interface with the Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Belder, M. (2017). The root and nothing but the root: primary compounds in Dutch. Syntax: 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, X. (2009). Hanyu de jufa yanbian yu cihuihua [Syntactic change and lexicalization in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 332 (5): 399–409.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duanmu, S. (1990). A formal study of syllable, tone, stress and domain in Chinese languages. Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institution of Technology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Wordhood in Chinese. In J. L. Packard (Ed.), New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation: Morphology, Phonology and the Lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese (pp. 135–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, D. (2004). On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 351: 355–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fan, J. (1958). Xing-ming zuhe jian ‘de’ zi de yufa zuoyong [The grammatical function of de in adjective-noun constructions], Zhongguo Yuwen (5): 213–217.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, S. (1997). Hanyu de Yunlv, Cifa yu Jufa [Prosody, Morphology and Syntax of Chinese]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, H. (2009). The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In A. Giannakidou & M. Rathert (Eds.), Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization (pp. 320–342). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Lexical decomposition in modern generative grammar. In M. Werning, W. Hinzen & E. Machery (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality (pp. 328–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C-T. J. (1984). Phrase structure, lexical integrity, and Chinese compounds. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 19 (2): 53–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (2006). Resultatives and unaccusatives: a parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan 2531: 1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, H. (2016). Exploration of Syntax-Phonology Interface in Chinese: Perspectives from Phase Theory and Distributed Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation. Luoyang: PLA University of Foreign Languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Y. (1990). On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 81: 177–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). The thematic hierarchy and causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 131: 255–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, J. (2012). Jiyu yuliaoku de dongbin fuheci shuxing kaocha jiqi cihuihua chengdu fenxi [A corpus-based study of the properties of VO compounds and their lexicalization]. Xiandai Yuwen (10): 42–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lopez, L. (2015). Parallel computation in word-formation. Linguistic Inquiry 46 (4): 657–701. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, Z. (1957). Hanyu de Goucifa [Chinese Morphology]. Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (2001). Words. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Phases and words. In S.-H. Choe (Ed.), Phases in the Theory of Grammar (pp. 191–222). Seoul: Dong In Publisher.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Packard, J. L. (2000). The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubin, A. D. (2010). A Brief Introduction to the Semitic Languages. New Jersey: Gorgias Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shiao, W. (2015). Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin. In W. S.-Y. Wang & C. Sun (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics (pp. 306–321). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, A. (2001). Definiteness agreement and the Chinese DP. Language and Linguistics 21: 125–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, S. (1973). Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese: A case for lexical rules. Language 491: 361–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, W-T. D. (2003). Three types of existential quantification in Chinese. In A. Li & A. Simpson (Eds.), Form, Interpretation and Functional Structure: Perspectives from Asian Languages. London: Curzon/Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
William, A. (2008). Word order in resultatives. In C. Chang & H. Haynie (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 26. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiong, Z. (2005). Yi “de” wei hexin de DP jiegou [A DP structure headed by de]. Dangdai Yuyanxue 7(2): 148–165.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Yinghan Zhishi Jufa Lunyuan Jiegou de Duibi Yanjiu [A Contrastive Study of Argument Structures in Causative Construction in English and Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Languages Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, X. (2003). Yusu Lun [On Morphemes]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, N. (2007). Root merger in Chinese compounds. Studia Linguistica 61(2): 170–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, G. & Cheng, G. (2018). How are VN compounds in Chinese derived? Dangdai Yuyanxue 20 (1): 61–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, J. (2005). Hanyu Cihui Jiegou Lun [On the Structure of Chinese Words]. Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. (2015). A Research of the Subject-Predicate Compounds Words in Contemporary Chinese. MA Thesis. Jinan: Shandong University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rokhmah, Luthfiah Nur & Tasya Rahmadona
2022. analysis of suppletion and word compounding in “Bangle Seller” short story. LADU: Journal of Languages and Education 2:4 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Yusuf, Aprilulloh & Shellma Deu Shand
2021. Compound words implementations in “flowers in the attic” novel by VC Andrews. LADU: Journal of Languages and Education 2:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue