Cover not available

In:Moving Bodies in Interaction – Interacting Bodies in Motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports
Edited by Christian Meyer and Ulrich v. Wedelstaedt
[Advances in Interaction Studies 8] 2017
► pp. 267–300

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 11
Intercorporeal (re)enaction

Instructional correction in basketball practice

Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.8.11eva
Abstract
Sports coaching scholars increasingly understand coaching as a socio-pedagogical activity consisting of social interactions between coaches and athletes that aim to teach and improve skills and competencies. Coach feedback for the purpose of correcting player performance is a core feature of this activity, but coaching scholarship exploring the fine-grained organization of coaching corrections remains minimal. This chapter examines how correction events in basketball training are interactionally organized via participants’ mobilization of sequential embodied and linguistic resources. The analysis centres on the participants’ collaborative production and use of reenactments as a means of correcting player conduct, illuminating how the coach and players collaborate to configure an intercorporeal context that enables players to see and feel problematic performances and their correct alternatives.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and instruction in physical activities
  • Demonstrations and reenactments in instructional corrections of physical activities
  • Data and method
  • Orienting to an instructional activity
  • Orienting to an instructional activity as a correction of the prior drill performance
  • Building an intercorporeal perceptual environment for reenactments
  • Projecting reenactments into the constructed activity space
  • Enacting correct conduct
  • The intercorporeal accomplishment of correction contrast Pairs
  • Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
  • Appendix
References (35)
References
Cushion, C. (2007). Modelling the complexity of the coaching process. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2(4), 395–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cushion, C., Armour, K., & Jones, R. L. (2006). Locating the coaching process in practice: Models ‘for’ and ‘of’ coaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 11(1), 83–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, B. (2013). Order on the court: The interactional organization of basketball practice activities. (Doctoral thesis), University of Western Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, B., & Reynolds, E. (2016). The organization of corrective demonstrations using embodied action in sports coaching feedback. Symbolic Interaction, 39(4), 525–556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). (1986). Ethnomethodological studies of work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175–206). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25(2), 237–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). The body in action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (eds.), Discourse, the body, and identity (pp. 19–42). Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organisation of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engestrom & D. Middleton (eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne and Madrid: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Embodied action and organizational activity. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 283–307). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hindmarsh, J., Hyland, L., & Banerjee. (2014). Work to make simulation work: ‘Realism’, instructional correction and the body in training. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 247–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hindmarsh, J., Reynolds, P., & Dunne, S. (2011). Exhibiting understanding: The body in apprenticeship. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 489–503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, R. L., Armour, K., & Potrac, P. (2002). Understanding the coaching process: A framework for social analysis. Quest, 54(1), 34–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, R. L., Ronglan, L. T., Potrac, P., & Cushion, C. (2011). Concluding thoughts and ways forward. In R. L. Jones, P. Potrac, C. Cushion, & L. T. Ronglan (eds.), The sociology of sports coaching (pp. 179–186). Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keevallik, L. (2010). Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 401–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). Can you see the cystic artery yet? A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 521–541. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindwall, O., & Ekstrom, A. (2012). Instruction-in-interaction: The teaching and learning of a manual skill. Human Studies, 35(1), 27–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindwall, O., & Lymer, G. (2014). Inquiries of the body: Novice questions and the instructable observability of endodotic scenes. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 271–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the preservation of fundamental features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, & H.-G. Soeffner (eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 51–68). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Operating together through videoconference: Members’ procedures for accomplishing a common space of interaction. In S. Hester & D. Francis (eds.), Orders of ordinary action: Respecifying sociological knowledge (pp. 51–68). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3). Retrieved from [URL]
Nishizaka, A. (2006). What to learn: The embodied structure of the environment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(2), 119–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Okada, M. (2013). Embodied interactional competence in boxing practice: Coparticipants’ joint accomplishment of a teaching and learning activity. Language & Communication, 33(4), 390–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potrac, P., Brewer, C., Jones, R. L., Armour, K., & Hoff, J. (2000). Toward an holistic understanding of the coaching process. Quest, 61(2), 223–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potrac, P., & Jones, R. L. (2009). Power, conflict, and cooperation: Towards a micropolitics of coaching. . Quest, 61(2), 223–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation, volumes I and II. G. Jefferson (ed), with introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharrock, W. W., & Anderson, R. (1982). Talking and teaching: Reflective comments on in-classroom activities. In G. Payne & D. Hustler (eds.), Doing teaching (pp. 170–183). London: Batesford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(4), 377–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (2008). Depicting by gesture. Gesture, 8(3), 285–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tutt, D., & Hindmarsh, J. (2011). Reenactments at work: Demonstrating conduct in data sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(3), 211–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weeks, P. (1985). Error-correction techniques and sequences in instructional settings: Toward a comparative framework. Human Studies, 8(3), 195–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). A rehearsal of a Beethoven passage: An analysis of correction talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 247–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Fele, Giolo & Gian Marco Campagnolo
2024. Seeing bad luck: player participation to tactical video analysis in amateur football. Sports Coaching Review 13:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Ehmer, Oliver & Geert Brône
2021. Instructing embodied knowledge: multimodal approaches to interactive practices for knowledge constitution. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4 DOI logo
Evans, Bryn & Oskar Lindwall
2020. Show Them or Involve Them? Two Organizations of Embodied Instruction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:2 ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Brümmer, Kristina
2019. Spielsysteme, Matchpläne, Spielanalysen. Sport und Gesellschaft 16:3 ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue