In:Moving Bodies in Interaction – Interacting Bodies in Motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports
Edited by Christian Meyer and Ulrich v. Wedelstaedt
[Advances in Interaction Studies 8] 2017
► pp. 149–171
Chapter 6Rock climbers’ communicative and sensory practices
Routine intercorporeality between climbers, rock, and auxiliary technologies
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.8.06jen
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.8.06jen
Abstract
This chapter, following Allen-Collinson & Hockey (2011), focuses on intercorporeal sensory perception in sport through verbal, haptic, ocular, and other forms of interaction as displayed and communicated by rock climbers in collaborative (en)action. It takes an ethnomethodological based video-analytic ethnographic approach, using video clips of rock climbers in collaborative (en)action to portray their verbal and non-verbal communicative and intercorporeal mundane practices. The research is based upon participant (my own, if non-expert, climbing) and non-participant observation (watching various others climb). Also interviews and video recordings of rock climbers at various climbing sites in Northumberland, Snowdonia, the Lake District and Yorkshire in the United Kingdom were conducted. Following a brief introduction to rock climbing in general, rock climbing is then discussed as an intercoproreal sporting activity after which the argument for an ethnomethodological approach to its study in this case is then made.
This paper then uses three examples of rock climbing activities: (1) two climbers discussing with a guidebook the various routes on short crag face which they intend to climb; (2) two climbers discussing a route on a boulder route which one then climbs ‘unassisted’; and lastly (3), a quarry sports climb upon which two climbers are top roping. From these we will build up a series of brief analytic descriptions of intercorporeal enaction of knowledge and practices in rock climbing. Practices, which are both verbal and non-verbal with various types of intercorporeal enaction. Thematic to the ensuing descriptions is the role of auxiliary technologies, that alongside the climbers and the rock itself, form part of the intercorporeal matrix. It will be argued that intercorporeal enaction when expertly performed allows that practical action to ‘disappear’ from the content of the ongoing verbal interaction. While the intercorporeal enaction is dropped as a conversational topic, with other non-immediate topics replacing it, the on-going physical enaction practices are still key to understanding members’ intercorporeal enaction of climbing and its performativity.
Keywords: rock climbing, ethnomethodology, haptic, interaction, inter-corporeal, materiality, senses
Article outline
- 1.Rock climbing: An introduction
- 2.Rock climbing as intercorporeal practice
- 3.An ethnomethodological approach to rock climbing and intercorporeality
- 4.Intercorporeal enaction: The lived work of climbing
- 4.1Example 1: Intercopreal enaction in collaborative assessments
- 4.2Example 2: Intercorporeal enaction in collaborative climbing
- 4.3Example 3: Intercorporeal enaction with auxiliary technologies
- Discussion
Acknowledgements References
References (38)
Allen-Collinson, J. & Hockey, J. (2011). Feeling the Way: Notes towards a haptic phenomenology of distance running and scuba diving. Int. Rev. for the Sociology of Sport 46(3), 330–345.
(2015). From a certain point of view: sensorary phenomenological envisioning of running space and place. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 44(1), 63–83.
Barratt, P. (2012). ‘My magic cam’: a more-than-representational account of the climbing assemblage. Area, 44 (1), 46–53.
Bogardus, L. M. (2012). The Bolt Wars: A Social Worlds Perspective on Rock Climbing and Intragroup Conflict. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 41(3) 283–308.
Burke, S. M., Sparkes A. C. & Allen-Collinson, J. (2008.) High Altitude Climbers as Ethnomethodologists making sense of Cognitive Dissonance: Ethnographic Insights from an Attempt to Scale Mt. Everest. The Sport Psychologist, 22, 336–355.
Coates, S. (1999). Analysing the Physical: An Ethnomethodological Study of Boxing. Ethnographic Studies, 4, 14–26.
Crossley, N. (1995). Body Techniques, Agency and Intercorporeality: On Goffman’s Relations in Public. Sociology. 29(1) p133–149.
Earl, John (ed.). (2004). Northumberland Climbing Guide. Northumberland: Northumberland Mountaineering Club.
Eden, S. & Barratt, P. (2010). Outdoor versus indoors? Angling ponds, climbing walls and changing expectations of environmental leisure. Area, 42(40), 487–493.
Jenkings, K. N. (2013). Playing Dangerously: An Ethnomethodological View upon Rock Climbing. In P. Tolmie, & M. Rouncefield (eds.), Ethnomethodology at Play (191–210). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Jenkings, K. N., & Barber, N. (2006). Same evidence, different meanings: Transformation of textual evidence in hospital new drugs committees. Text and Talk, 26(2), 169–189.
Fischer, S. (2007). Social Ecology and the Flesh. In S. L. Cataldi & W. S. Hamrick (eds), Merleau-Ponty and Environmental Philosophy (203–216). New York: SUNY Press.
Girton, G. D. (1986). Kung Fu: toward a praxiological hermeneutic of the martial arts. In H. Garfinkel (ed.) Ethnomethodological Studies of Work (60–91). London: RKP.
Heywood, I. (2006). Climbing Monsters: Excess and Restraint in Contemporary Rock climbing. Leisure Studies. 25(4) 455–467.
Hockey, John C. (2009). Mundane Ritual Practices and Distance Running. Journal of Ritual Studies, 23(2). pp. 77–88. ISSN 0890-1112.
Hockey, J. & Allen-Collinson, J. (2009). The sensorium at work: the sensory phenomenology of the working body. The Sociological Review. 55(2), 217–239.
Jung, H. Y. (2007). Merleau-Pony’s Transversal Geophilosphy and Sinic Aesthetics of Nature. In S. L. Cataldi & W. S. Hamrick (eds), Merleau-Ponty and Environmental Philosophy (235–257). New York: SUNY Press.
Kiewa, J. (2002). Traditional Climbing: metaphor of resistance or matanarrative of oppression? Leisure Studies, 21, 145–161.
de Leseleuc, E., Gleyse, J., & Marcellini, A. (2002). The Practice of Sport as political Expression. International Sociology, 17(1), 73–90.
Lewis, N. (2000). The climbing body, nature and the experience of modernity. Body and Society, 6(3–4), 58–80.
Liberman, K. (2007). An Inquiry into the Intercorporeal Relations Between Humans and the Earth In S. L. Cataldi & W. S. Hamrick (eds), Merleau-Ponty and Environmental Philosophy (37–49). New York: SUNY Press.
Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, V. (2008). Everyday Masculinities and Extreme Sport: Male Identity and Rock Climbing. Oxford: Berg.
Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, Professionals and Serious Leisure. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
(1993). Social world, life-style, and serious leisure: towards a mesosocial analysis. World Leisure and Recreation, 35, 23–26.
Tejada-Flores, L. ([1967]1978). The Games Climbers Play. In K. Wilson (ed.) The Games Climbers Play (19–27) London: Baton Wicks.
Tomie, P. & Crabtree, A. (2013). A Day Out in the Country In P. Tolmie, & M. Rouncefield (eds.), Ethnomethodology at Play (159–190). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Treanor, B. (2010). High Aspirations: Climbing and Self-Cultivation, In S. Schmid (ed.) Climbing: Philosopy for Everyone (67–80). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Mason, Olivia
Nielsen, Ann Merrit Rikke, Brian L Due & Louise Lüchow
Allen-Collinson, Jacquelyn, Dona L. Hall & Patricia C. Jackman
Corsby, Charles L.T.
Cook, Richard & John Hockey
Due, Brian L. & Louise Lüchow
Simone, Monica & Renata Galatolo
Ehmer, Oliver & Geert Brône
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
