In:Moving Bodies in Interaction – Interacting Bodies in Motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports
Edited by Christian Meyer and Ulrich v. Wedelstaedt
[Advances in Interaction Studies 8] 2017
► pp. 93–111
Chapter 4Visual and motor components of action anticipation in basketball and soccer
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.8.04urg
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.8.04urg
Abstract
Time demanding sports require the ability to form anticipatory representations of on-going actions to complete missing perceptual information and anticipate timely motor responses. Compared to novices, elite athletes are endowed with unique abilities to foresee, predict and anticipate the future of opponents’ actions. In the present chapter, I use a cognitive neuroscience approach to address the issue of whether and how these superior perceptual abilities derive from athletes’ previous motor experience or visual familiarity. I discuss a series of behavioral and neuroscientific studies that have tested the role of motor and visual components of sport expertise and suggest that excellence in sports relies on complimentary and flexible use of motor and visual anticipatory models of ongoing actions, especially when facing players that attempt to fool the observer.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Action prediction in sport
- Predicting fooling actions
- Functional role of motor and visual areas in action prediction
- Conclusions
Notes References
References (70)
Abernethy, B., & Zawi, K. (2007). Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of motor behavior, 39, 353–367.
Abernethy, B., Zawi, K., & Jackson, R. C. (2008). Expertise and attunement to kinematic constraints. Perception, 37, 931–948.
Abreu, A. M., Macaluso, E., Azevedo, R. T., Cesari, P., Urgesi, C., & Aglioti, S. M. (2012). Action anticipation beyond the action observation network: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in expert basketball players. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 35(10), 1646–1654.
Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature neuroscience, 11, 1109–1116.
Alaerts, K., Heremans, E., Swinnen, S. P., & Wenderoth, N. (2009). How are observed actions mapped to the observer’s motor system? Influence of posture and perspective. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 415–422.
Alaerts, K., Senot, P., Swinnen, S. P., Craighero, L., Wenderoth, N., & Fadiga, L. (2010). Force requirements of observed object lifting are encoded by the observer’s motor system: a TMS study. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 31(6), 1144–1153.
Avenanti, A., Annella, L., Candidi, M., Urgesi, C., & Aglioti, S. M. (2013). Compensatory plasticity in the action observation network: virtual lesions of STS enhance anticipatory simulation of seen actions. Cerebral cortex, 23, 570–580.
Avenanti, A., Candidi, M., & Urgesi, C. (2013). Vicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 185.
Avenanti, A., & Urgesi, C. (2011). Understanding “what” others do: mirror mechanisms play a crucial role in action perception. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 6, 257–259.
Borroni, P., Montagna, M., Cerri, G., & Baldissera, F. (2005). Cyclic time course of motor excitability modulation during the observation of a cyclic hand movement. Brain research, 1065, 115–124.
Brault, S., Bideau, B., Craig, C. M., & Kulpa, R. (2010). Balancing deceit and disguise: how to successfully fool the defender in a 1 vs. 1 situation in rugby. Human Movement Science, 29(3), 412–425.
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 15, 1243–1249.
Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current biology: CB, 16, 1905–1910.
Cañal-Bruland, R., & Schmidt, M. (2009). Response bias in judging deceptive movements. Acta psychologica, 130, 235–240.
Cañal-Bruland, R., van der Kamp, J., & van Kesteren, J. (2010). An examination of motor and perceptual contributions to the recognition of deception from others’ actions. Human movement science, 29, 94–102.
Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16, 69–74.
Craig, C. M. (2013). Understanding perception and action in sport: how can virtual reality technology help? Sports Technology, 6(4), 161–169.
Craig, C. M., Bastin, J., & Montagne, G. (2011). How information guides movement: intercepting curved free kicks in soccer. Human movement science, 30, 931–941.
Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A., & Grafton, S. T. (2006). Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. NeuroImage, 31(3), 1257–1267.
Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A., Kraemer, D. J. M., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(7), 1383–1392.
Cross, E. S., Kraemer, D. J. M., De, A. F., Hamilton, A., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 315–326.
Dessing, J. C., & Craig, C. M. (2010). Bending it like Beckham: how to visually fool the goalkeeper. PloS one, 5, e13161.
Dicks, M., Button, C., & Davids, K. (2010). Availability of advance visual information constrains association-football goalkeeping performance during penalty kicks. Perception, 39, 1111–1124.
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., & Olivier, E. (2005). Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action. Current opinion in neurobiology, 15, 213–218.
Finke, R. A., & Freyd, J. J. (1985). Transformations of visual memory induced by implied motions of pattern elements. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 11, 780–794.
Finke, R. A., & Shyi, G. C. (1988). Mental extrapolation and representational momentum for complex implied motions. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 14, 112–120.
Flach, R., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2004). The two-thirds power law in motion perception. Visual Cognition, 11, 461–481.
Fuchs, T., & Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–486.
Gangitano, M., Mottaghy, F. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2004). Modulation of premotor mirror neuron activity during observation of unpredictable grasping movements. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 20(8), 2193–2202.
Gazzola, V., & Keysers, C. (2009). The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 19, 1239–1255.
Handford, C., Davids, K., Bennett, S., & Button, C. (1997). Skill acquisition in sport: some applications of an evolving practice ecology. Journal of Sports Sciences, 15(6), 621–640.
Hecht, H., Vogt, S., & Prinz, W. (2001). Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: a case for action-perception transfer. Psychological research, 65, 3–14.
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878.
Hubbard, T. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822–851.
Ingvar, D. H. (1985). “Memory of the future”: an essay on the temporal organization of conscious awareness. Human neurobiology, 4, 127–136.
Jackson, R. C., Warren, S., & Abernethy, B. (2006). Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta psychologica, 123, 355–371.
Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: from entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 363, 2021–31.
Komatsu, H. (2006). The neural mechanisms of perceptual filling-in. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 220–231.
Makris, S., & Urgesi, C. (2015). Neural underpinnings of superior action-prediction abilities in soccer players. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 342–351.
Mann, D. L., Abernethy, B., & Farrow, D. (2010). Visual information underpinning skilled anticipation: The effect of blur on a coupled and uncoupled in situ anticipatory response. Attention, perception & psychophysics, 72, 1317–1326.
Motes, M. a, Hubbard, T. L., Courtney, J. R., & Rypma, B. (2008). A principal components analysis of dynamic spatial memory biases. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 34, 1076–1083.
Perrett, D. I., Xiao, D., Barraclough, N. E., Keysers, C., & Oram, M. W. (2009). Seeing the future: Natural image sequences produce “anticipatory” neuronal activity and bias perceptual report. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 62, 2081–2104.
Pessoa, L., Thompson, E., & Noë, a. (1998). Finding out about filling-in: a guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 21, 723–748; discussion 748–802.
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and Action Planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154.
Ramnani, N., & Miall, R. C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature neuroscience, 7, 85–90.
Ranganathan, R., & Carlton, L. G. (2007). Perception-action coupling and anticipatory performance in baseball batting. Journal of motor behavior, 39, 369–380.
Reithler, J., van Mier, H. I., Peters, J. C., & Goebel, R. (2007). Nonvisual motor learning influences abstract action observation. Current Biology, 17, 1201–1207.
Ripoll, H., Kerlirzin, Y., Stein, J. F., & Reine, B. (1995). Analysis of information processing, decision making, and visual strategies in complex problem solving sport situations. Human Movement Science, 14, 325–349.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual review of neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
Romani, M., Cesari, P., Urgesi, C., Facchini, S., & Aglioti, S. M. (2005). Motor facilitation of the human cortico-spinal system during observation of bio-mechanically impossible movements. NeuroImage, 26(3), 755–763.
Rowe, R., Horswill, M. S., Kronvall-Parkinson, M., Poulter, D. R., & McKenna, F. P. (2009). The Effect of Disguise on Novice and Expert Tennis Players’ Anticipation Ability. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 178–185.
Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(4), 585–615.
Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Prospective coding in event representation. Cognitive processing, 8, 93–102.
Sebanz, N., & Shiffrar, M. (2009). Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 16, 170–175.
Smeeton, N. J., & Huys, R. (2010). Anticipation of tennis-shot direction from whole-body movement: The role of movement amplitude and dynamics. Human movement science, 44.
Tidoni, E., Borgomaneri, S., di Pellegrino, G., & Avenanti, A. (2013). Action Simulation Plays a Critical Role in Deceptive Action Recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(2), 611–623.
Tomeo, E., Cesari, P., Aglioti, S. M., & Urgesi, C. (2013). Fooling the Kickers but not the Goalkeepers: Behavioral and Neurophysiological Correlates of Fake Action Detection in Soccer. Cerebral cortex. 23, 2765–2778.
Urgesi, C., Candidi, M., & Avenanti, A. (2014). Neuroanatomical substrates of action perception and understanding: an anatomic likelihood estimation meta-analysis of lesion-symptom mapping studies in brain injured patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(May), 344.
Urgesi, C., Candidi, M., Fabbro, F., Romani, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2006). Motor facilitation during action observation: topographic mapping of the target muscle and influence of the onlooker’s posture. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 23(9), 2522–2530.
Urgesi, C., Maieron, M., Avenanti, A., Tidoni, E., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2010). Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. Cerebral cortex, 20, 2511–2521.
Urgesi, C., Moro, V., Candidi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2006). Mapping implied body actions in the human motor system. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 7942–7949.
Urgesi, C., Savonitto, M., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, S. (2012). Long-and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball. Psychological research, 76, 540–562.
Verfaillie, K., & Daems, A. (2002). Representing and anticipating human actions in vision. Visual Cognition, 9, 217–232.
Vrij, A. (2004). Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 159–181.
Weissensteiner, J., Abernethy, B., Farrow, D., & Müller, S. (2008). The development of anticipation: a cross-sectional examination of the practice experiences contributing to skill in cricket batting. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(6), 663–684.
Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport (p. 441). London: E & FN Spon.
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Paolini, Simone, Paolo Presti, Emilia Scalona, Gabriele Boccolini, Giacomo Rizzolatti, Maddalena Fabbri-Destro & Pietro Avanzini
Hydén, Lars-Christer, Anna Ekström & Ali Reza Majlesi
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Maddalena Fabbri-Destro, Arturo Nuara, Roberto Gatti & Pietro Avanzini
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
