In:Alignment in Communication: Towards a new theory of communication
Edited by Ipke Wachsmuth, Jan de Ruiter, Petra Jaecks and Stefan Kopp
[Advances in Interaction Studies 6] 2013
► pp. 11–32
Methodological paradigms in interaction research
Published online: 30 November 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.6.02rui
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.6.02rui
Interaction researchers often tend to identify themselves and others with the methods they are using, rather than with the topic they are studying. I survey a number of commonly used research methods in human interaction research, and indicate some of their strengths, weaknesses, and relative advantages. I will argue that human interaction is a topic of such massive complexity that it will require not only a multidisciplinary approach, but also, and more importantly, a multimethodological approach. This requires open-mindedness about the use of methods that we happen not to be familiar with. Combining different qualitative and quantitative methods to address similar and converging research questions is essential for gaining progress in the complex field of human interaction.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Rissman, Lilia, Qiawen Liu & Gary Lupyan
Nordfalk, Jenny M, Trygve Holmøy, Owen Thomas, Magne Nylenna & Pal Gulbrandsen
Albert, Saul & J. P. de Ruiter
Albert, Saul, J. P. de Ruiter, Rolf Zwaan & Mark Dingemanse
de Ruiter, J. P. & Saul Albert
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
