Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Pantomime
Edited by Przemysław Żywiczyński, Johan Blomberg and Monika Boruta-Żywiczyńska
[Advances in Interaction Studies 12] 2024
► pp. 100–114

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 4
Two types of bodily-mimetic communication

Distinct design specifications and evolutionary trajectories

 | Nicolaus Copernicus University
 | Nicolaus Copernicus University
Published online: 15 February 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.12.04wac
Abstract
In this paper, we outline a novel approach to the study of pantomime, through applying the logic of evolutionary signalling theory to analysing the properties of the proposed precursors of language, in particular bodily-mimetic communication. We rely on a classic account by Krebs & Dawkins (1984), who outline two very different trajectories of the evolution of communication: into conspicuous, repetitive, exaggerated, and loud displays (expensive hype) versus cheap, subtle, inconspicuous and efficient messages (conspiratorial whispers). Pantomimic scenarios of language origins envisage a progression from mimetic to conventional communication, i.e., towards greater efficiency and expressive power, thereby assuming the latter trajectory. We argue that as a default, bodily mimetic communication is instead predicted to follow (or, remain trapped in) the expensive-hype trajectory, resulting in the communicative uses of the body that are defined by a high cost, such as artistic, sexual or ritual displays. The development of such forms of communication into systems increasingly resembling language could not happen on the surface level of communicative properties alone. Such changes could instead only happen as a result of the communication system switching to the efficient trajectory, which requires very special socio-ecological conditions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Pantomimic scenarios of language origins
  • 3.Evolutionary signalling theory
  • 4.Flashy vs. efficient bodily mimetic communication
    • 4.1Ritual
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
References (48)
References
Arbib, M. (2012). How the Brain Got Language. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Towards a computational comparative neuroprimatology: framing the language-ready brain. Physics of life reviews, 16, 1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailey, W. J. Withers, P. C., Endersby, M., Gaull, K. (1993). The energetic costs of calling in the bushcricket Requena verticalis (Orthoptera: Tettigonidae: Listroscelidinae). J. Exp. Biol., 178, 21–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barba, E. (1995). The paper canoe. A guide to theatre anthropology. London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bliege Bird, R., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling Theory, Strategic Interaction, and Symbolic Capital. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 221–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyd, R. (2009). Does an evolutionary perspective help understand environmental degradation?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(2), 71–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cronk, L. (2005). The application of animal signaling theory to human phenomena. Soc. Sci. Inf, 44, 603–620. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fay, N., Arbib, M., & Garrod, S. (2013). How to bootstrap a human communication system. Cognitive Science, 37(7), 1356–1367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. (2017). Demonstration and pantomime in the evolution of teaching. Front. Psych., 8, 415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Pantomime as a foundation for ritual and language. Studia Liturgica, 48(1–2), 41–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartmann, S., & Pleyer, M. (2021). Constructing a protolanguage: reconstructing prehistoric languages in a usage-based construction grammar framework. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1824), 20200200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and human behavior, 30(4), 244–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurford, J. R. (2007). The origins of meaning: Language in the light of evolution, Vol. 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutto, D. (2008). First Communions: Mimetic sharing without theory of mind. In J. Zlatev et al.. (Eds.), The Shared Mind (pp. 246–276). Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irons, W. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In R. M. Nesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 290–309). Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapitány, R., & Nielsen, M. (2015). Adopting the ritual stance: The role of opacity and context in ritual and everyday actions. Cognition, 145, 13–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knight, C. (1998). Ritual/speech co-evolution: A solution to the problem of deception. In J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language. Social and cognitive bases (pp. 68–91). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R., Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal Signals: Mind-Reading and Manipulation. In J. R. Krebs & R. Dawkins (Eds.), Behavioral ecology (pp. 380–402). Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lameira, A. R., & Call, J. (2018). Time-space–displaced responses in the orangutan vocal system. Science Advances, 4(11), eaau3401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, J. D. (2014). BaYaka Pygmy multi-modal and mimetic communication traditions. In D. Dor, C. Knight, & J. Lewis (Eds), The Social origins of language (pp. 77–91). Oxford University Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. 2003. Animal Signals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, S. (2001). Social action: A teleological account. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mineiro, A., Báez-Montero, I. C., Moita, M., Galhano-Rodrigues, I., & Castro-Caldas, A. (2021). Disentangling pantomime from early sign in a new sign language: window into language evolution research. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 1130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mineiro, A., Carmo, P., Caroça, C., Moita, M., Carvalho, S., Paço, J., & Zaky, A. (2017). Emerging linguistic features of sao tome and principe sign language. Sign Language & Linguistics, 20(1), 109–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Power, C. (2014). The evolution of ritual as a process of sexual selection. The social origins of language. In D. Dor, C. Knight, & J. Lewis (Eds), The social origins of language (pp. 196–207). Oxford University Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, G., Lewandowski, J., & Galantucci, B. (2015). How communication changes when we cannot mime the world: Experimental evidence for the effect of iconicity on combinatoriality. Cognition, 141, 52–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sachs, J., Rubenstein, D. (2007). The evolution of cooperative breeding... Behav. Proc., 76(2), 131–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H. J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searcy, W., Nowicki, S. (2005). The Evolution of Animal Communication. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. (1994). Pantomimes. Didaskalia, 1(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soler, M. (2012). Costly signaling, ritual and cooperation: Evidence from Candomblé, an Afro-Bazilian religion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 346–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonesson, G. (2007). From the meaning of embodiment to the embodiment of meaning: A study in phenomenological semiotics. In T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev & R. Frank (Eds.), Body, language and mind. Vol 1: Embodiment (p. 85–128). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. R. (2003). Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-cultural research, 37(2), 211–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sosis, R., Kress, H. C., & Boster, J. S. (2007). Scars for war: evaluating alternative signaling explanations for cross-cultural variance in ritual costs. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 234–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sulik, J. (2018). Cognitive mechanisms for inferring the meaning of novel signals during symbolisation. PloS One, 13(1), e0189540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wacewicz, S., & Żywiczyński, P. (2021). Pantomimic conceptions of language origins. In N. Gontier, A. Lock, C. Sinha (Eds.), Handbook of human symbolic evolution. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H., & Lanman, J. A. (2014). The ties that bind us: Ritual, fusion, and identification. Current Anthropology, 55(6), 674–695. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., Fischer, R., Reddish, P., Skewes, J., Geertz, A. W., … & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1602–1605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2014). Human uniqueness, bodily mimesis and the evolution of language. Humana. Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 7(27), 197–219.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Meaning making from life to language: The semiotic hierarchy and phenomenology. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Persson, T., & Gärdenfors, P. (2005). Bodily mimesis as “the missing link” in human cognitive evolution. Lund University Cognitive Studies, 121, 1–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Żywiczyński, P., & Wacewicz, S. (2020). Pantomime as the original human-specific communicative system. Journal of Language Evolution, 5(2), 156–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Żywiczyński, P., Wacewicz, S., & Sibierska, M. (2018). Defining pantomime for language evolution research. Topoi, 37(2), 307–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Żywiczyński, P., Wacewicz, S., & Lister, C. (2021). Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1824), 20200204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue