Cover not available

In:Beyond Disfluency: The interplay of speech, gesture, and interaction
Loulou Kosmala
[Advances in Interaction Studies 11] 2024
► pp. 225–244

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

References

Published online: 17 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.11.refs
Abrahamson, D., & Bakker, A. (2016). Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adams, T. W. (1998). Gestures in foreigner talk. [Unplublished PhD thesis]. University of Pennsylvania.
Akhavan, N., Göksun, T., & Nozari, N. (2016). Disfluency production in speech and gesture. CogSci. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 593–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2007). Teachers’ gestures as a means of scaffolding students’ understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. Video Research in the Learning Sciences, 349–365.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allwood, J. (2017). Fluency or disfluency? Proceedings of DiSS 2017, the 8th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, 1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allwood, J., Ahlsén, E., Lund, J., & Sundqvist, J. (2005). Multimodality in own communication management. Proceedings from the Second Nordic Conference on Multimodal Communication.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allwood, J., Nivre, J., & Ahlsén, E. (1990). Speech Management – On the Non-written Life of Speech. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 13(1), 3–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azaoui, B. (2015). Fonctions pédagogiques et implications énonciatives de ressources professorales multimodales. Le cas de la bimanualité et de l’ubiquité coénonciative. Recherches En Didactique Des Langues et Des Cultures. Les Cahiers de l’Acedle, 12(12–2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azi, Y. A. (2018). Fillers, Repairs and Repetitions in the Conversations of Saudi English Speakers: Conversational Device or Disfluency Markers. International Journal of Linguistics, 10(6), 193–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, M. (2013). Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(4), 443–478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15(4), 469–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 21(4), 394–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, J., Gerwing, J., & Healing, S. (2014). Effect of dialogue on demonstrations: Direct quotations, facial portrayals, hand gestures, and figurative references. Discourse Processes, 51(8), 619–655. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, J., Gerwing, J., Sutton, C., & Prevost, D. (2008). Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 495–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beattie, G. W., & Shovelton, H. (1999). Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? An experimental investigation. Semiotica, 123(1/2), 001–030. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beattie, G. W. (1979). Planning units in spontaneous speech: Some evidence from hesitation in speech and speaker gaze direction in conversation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beattie, G. W., & Butterworth, B. L. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses and errors in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22(3), 201–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belhiah, H. (2013). Gesture as a resource for intersubjectivity in second-language learning situations. Classroom Discourse, 4(2), 111–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A. (2006). Speech Accommodation Theory and Audience Design. In J. L. Mey & R. E. Asher (Eds.), Concise encyclopaedia of pragmatics (second edition) (pp. 992–994). Elsevier Oxford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benus, S., Enos, F., Hirschberg, J. B., & Shriberg, E. (2006). Pauses in Deceptive Speech. Proceedings of ISCA, 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Betz, S. (2020). Hesitations in Spoken Dialogue Systems [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Bielefeld University.
Betz, S., Carlmeyer, B., Wagner, P., & Wrede, B. (2018). Interactive Hesitation Synthesis: Modelling and Evaluation. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(1), 9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Betz, S., & Gambino, S. L. (2016). Are we all disfluent in our own special way and should dialogue systems also be? Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung (ESSV) 2016, 81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Betz, S., & Kosmala, L. (2019). Fill the silence! Basics for modeling hesitation. The 9th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, 11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Betz, S., & Wagner, P. (2016). Disfluent Lengthening in Spontaneous Speech. Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung (ESSV) 2016.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot. Int., 5(9), 341–345.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency Rates in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boulis, C., Kahn, J. G., & Ostendorf, M. (2005). The role of disfluencies in topic classification of human-human conversations. AAAI Workshop on Spoken Language Understanding.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boutet, D. (2008). Une morphologie de la gestualité: Structuration articulaire. Cahiers de Linguistique Analogique, 5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Structuration physiologique de la gestuelle: Modèle et tests. Lidil. Revue de Linguistique et de Didactique Des Langues, 42, 77–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Pour une approche kinésiologique de la gestualité [Habilitation à diriger des recherches]. Université de Rouen-Normandie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2016). Grammatical Aspect and Gesture in French : a kinesiological approach. Vestnik RUDN, 20(3), 131–150.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brand, C., & Götz, S. (2013). Fluency versus accuracy in advanced spoken learner language. Errors and Disfluencies in Spoken Corpora, 52, 117–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, S. E., & Schober, M. F. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 274–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Handbücher zur Sprach-und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 38/2 (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1591). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broen, P. A., & Siegel, G. M. (1972). Variations in normal speech disfluencies. Language and Speech, 15(3), 219–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brouwer, C. E. (2004). Doing pronunciation: A specific type of repair sequence. Second Language Conversations, 93–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterworth, B., & Beattie, G. (1978). Gesture and silence as indicators of planning in speech. In R. N. Campbell & P. T. Smith (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language (pp. 347–360). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campione, E., & Véronis, J. (2002). A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration. Speech Prosody 2002, International Conference.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Candea, M. (2000). Contribution à l’étude des pauses silencieuses et des phénomènes dits « d’hésitation » en français oral spontané. Étude sur un corpus de récit en classe de français. [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris III.
(2017). Pratiques de prononciation et enjeux sociaux. Approches post-variationnistes en sociophonétique du français de France [Habilitation à diriger des recherches]. Université Grenoble Alpes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Candea, M., Vasilescu, I., & Adda-Decker, M. (2005). Inter-and intra-language acoustic analysis of autonomous fillers. DISS 05, Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop, 47–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cenoz, J. (1998). Pauses and Communication Strategies in Second Language Speech. (ERIC Document ED 426630).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christenfeld, N., & Creager, B. (1996). Anxiety, alcohol, aphasia, and ums. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(3), 451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christenfeld, N., Schachter, S., & Bilous, F. (1991). Filled pauses and gestures: It’s not coincidence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(1), 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christodoulides, G., Avanzi, M., & Goldman, J.-P. (2018). DisMo: A morphosyntactic, disfluency and multi-word unit annotator. An evaluation on a corpus of French spontaneous and read speech. ArXiv PreprintGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chui, K. (2005). Temporal patterning of speech and iconic gestures in conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(6), 871–887. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Image schemas and gesture. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, 29, 421–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. Cognitive Processes in Language, 149–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015a). The dynamic scope of relevant behaviors in talk: A perspective from cognitive linguistics. Proceedings of the 2nd European and the 5th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication, August 6–8, 2014, Tartu, Estonia, 110, 5–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Spoken language usage events. Language and Cognition, 7, 499–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Cognitive Linguistics, gesture studies, and multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 603–618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. & Irishkhanova, O. K. (2018). Aspectuality across Languages. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84(1), 73–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Speaking in time. Speech Communication, 36(1), 5–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Pauses and hesitations: Psycholinguistic approach. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 244–248). Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Wasow, T. (1998). Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 37(3), 201–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corley, M., & Stewart, O. W. (2008). Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech: The meaning of um. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 589–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2001). Introducing interactional linguistics. Studies in Interactional Linguistics, 122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crible, L. (2017). Discourse markers and (dis)fluency across registers: A contrastive usage-based study in English and French [PhD Thesis]. UCL – Université Catholique de Louvain.
Crible, L., Degand, L., & Gilquin, G. (2017). The clustering of discourse markers and filled pauses. Languages in Contrast, 17(1), 69–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crible, L., Dumont, A., Grosman, I., & Notarrigo, I. (2019). (Dis)fluency across spoken and signed languages: Application of an interoperable annotation scheme. In L. Degand, G. Gilquin, & A. C. Simon (Eds.), Fluency and Disfluency across Languages and Language Varieties (Corpora and Language in Use-Proceedings 4). Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2000). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(2), 989–999. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutting, J. (2001). The speech acts of the in-group. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(8), 1207–1233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). The in-group code lexis. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 28, 59–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danino, C. (2018). Les petits corpus – Introduction du numéro thématique. Corpus, 18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jong, N. H. (2016a). Fluency in second language assessment. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Assessment. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jong, N. H. (2016b). Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 113–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Fluency in second language testing: Insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 237–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jong, N. H., & Bosker, H. R. (2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. The 6th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS), 17–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Leeuw, E. (2007). Hesitation markers in English, German, and Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 19(2), 85–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debras, C. (2013). L’expression multimodale du positionnement interactionnel (multimodal stance-taking): Étude d’un corpus oral vidéo de discussions sur l’environnement en anglais britannique [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Université Sorbonne Nouvelle -Paris III.
(2018). Petits et grands corpus en analyse linguistique des gestes. Corpus, 18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debras, C., & Beaupoil-Hourdel, P. (2019). Gestualité et construction des chaînes de référence dans un corpus d’interactions tandem. Cahiers de Praxématique, 72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debras, C., Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., Morgenstern, A., Horgues, C., & Scheuer, S. (2020). Corrective Feedback Sequences in Tandem Interactions: Multimodal Cues and Speakers’ Positionings In S. Raineri, M. Sekali & A. Leroux (Eds.), La correction en langue(s) – Linguistic Correction/Correctness, 91–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debras, C., & Cienki, A. (2012). Some uses of head tilts and shoulder shrugs during human interaction, and their relation to stancetaking. International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing, 932–937. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debras, C., Horgues, C., & Scheuer, S. (2015). The multimodality of corrective feedback in tandem interactions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212, 16–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debreslioska, S., Özyürek, A., Gullberg, M., & Perniss, P. (2013). Gestural viewpoint signals referent accessibility. Discourse Processes, 50(7), 431–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 533–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deschamps, A. (1980). The syntactical distribution of pauses in English spoken as a second language by French students. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler (pp. 255–262). Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. (2020). Between sound and speech: Liminal signs in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 188–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dollaghan, C. A., & Campbell, T. F. (1992). A procedure for classifying disruptions in spontaneous language samples. Topics in Language Disorders. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (1998). Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: A Psycholinguistic Perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(3), 349–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duez, D. (1982). Silent and non-silent pauses in three speech styles. Language and Speech, 25(1), 11–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). La pause dans la parole de l’homme politique. Editions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Acoustic markers of political power. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(6), 641–654. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001a). Caractéristiques acoustiques et phonétiques des pauses remplies dans la conversation en français. Travaux Interdisciplinaires Du Laboratoire Parole et Langage d’Aix-En-Provence (TIPA), 20, 31–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001b). Signification des hésitations dans la parole spontanée. Revue Parole, 17–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dumont, A. (2018). Fluency and disfluency: A corpus study of non-native and native speaker (dis) fluency profiles [PhD Thesis]. UCL-Université Catholique de Louvain.
Dwijayanti, I., Budayasa, I. K., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2019). Students’ gestures in understanding algebraic concepts. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 12(2), 133–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edlund, J., Hirschberg, J. B., & Heldner, M. (2009). Pause and gap length in face-to-face interaction.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eguchi, M. (2016). Investigating the Relationships Between Vocabulary and Clause-internal Pauses and its Development in L2 Speech. Proceedings of the Pacific Second Language Research Forum (PacSLRF2016). Hiroshima: Japan Second Language Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S. (2010). Production methods in language acquisition research. Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research, 11–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eklund, R. (2001). Prolongations: A dark horse in the disfluency stable. ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Disfluency in Swedish human–human and human–machine travel booking dialogues [PhD Thesis]. Linköping University Electronic Press.
Eklund, R., & Shriberg, E. (1998). Crosslinguistic disfluency modelling: A comparative analysis of Swedish and American English human–human and human–machine dialogues. 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 30th November-4th December, 1998, Sydney, Australia, 6, 2627–2630. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2005). The body as a cognitive artifact in kinship representations: Hand gesture diagrams by speakers of Lao. Current Anthropology, 46(1), 51–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esposito, A., & Marinaro, M. (2007). What pauses can tell us about speech and gesture partnership. Nato security through science series human and societal dynamics, 18, 45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esposito, A., McCullough, K. E., & Quek, F. (2001). Disfluencies in gesture: Gestural correlates to filled and unfilled speech pauses. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Cues in Communication, 1–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fehringer, C., & Fry, C. (2007). Hesitation phenomena in the language production of bilingual speakers: The role of working memory. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae, 41(1–2), 37–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Bailey, K. G. D. (2004). Disfluencies and human language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5), 231–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech, 280, 20–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finlayson, I. R., & Corley, M. (2012). Disfluency in dialogue: An intentional signal from the speaker? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 921–928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (2000). From Cognitive Semantics to Lexical Pragmatics: The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Markers. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, B. A., Thompson, S. A., Ford, C. E., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2013). Conversation Analysis and Linguistics. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (p. 726). Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox Tree, J. E. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 709–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox Tree, J. (2007). Folk notions of um and uh, you know, and like. Text & Talk, 27, 297–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox Tree, J. E. & Clark, H. H. (1997). Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking. Cognition, 62(2), 151–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraundorf, S. H., & Watson, D. G. (2011). The disfluent discourse: Effects of filled pauses on recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 161–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Alice’s adventures in um-derland: Psycholinguistic sources of variation in disfluency production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(9), 1083–1096. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galaczi, E. (2014). Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests? Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553–574. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galaczi, E., & Taylor, L. (2018). Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 219–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gawne, L., & McCulloch, G. (2019). Emoji as digital gestures. Language@ Internet, 17(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2008). Hesitation markers among EFL learners: Pragmatic deficiency or difference. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente (pp. 119–149). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ginzburg, J., Fernández, R., & Schlangen, D. (2014). Disfluencies as intra-utterance dialogue moves. Semantics and Pragmatics, 7, 9–1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ginzburg, J., & Poesio, M. (2016). Grammar is a system that characterizes talk in interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1938. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 419–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100(2), 279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, J.-P., Avanzi, M., & Auchlin, A. (2010). Hesitations in read vs. Spontaneous French in a multi-genre corpus. DiSS-LPSS Joint Workshop 2010.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1958). The predictability of words in context and the length of pauses in speech. Language and Speech, 1(3), 226–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 115–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). The body in action. In Discourse, the body, and identity (pp. 19–42). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Multimodality in human interaction. Calidoscopio, 8(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In D. Middleton & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Participation. A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, 222–224.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19(1), 283–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 51–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Götz, S. (2013). Fluency in native and nonnative English speech (John Benjamins Publishing, Vol. 53). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graziano, M., & Gullberg, M. (2013). Gesture production and speech fluency in competent speakers and language learners. Presentado En TIGER, Tilburg University, Holanda.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). When speech stops, gesture stops: Evidence from developmental and crosslinguistic comparisons. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 879. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F., & Deschamps, A. (1972). Analyse des variables temporelles du français spontané. Phonetica, 26(3), 129–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1975). Analyse contrastive des variables temporelles de l’anglais et du français: Vitesse de parole et variables composantes, phénomènes d’hésitation. Phonetica, 31(3–4), 144–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosman, I. (2018). Évaluation contextuelle de la (dis) fluence en production et perception: Pratiques communicatives et formes prosodico-syntaxiques en français [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. UCL-Université Catholique de Louvain.
Grosman, I., Simon, A. C., & Degand, L. (2019). Empathetic hearers perceive repetitions as less disfluent, especially in non-broadcast situations. Proceedings of DiSS, 2019, the 9th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guaïtella, I. (1993). Functional, acoustical and perceptual analysis of vocal hesitations in spontaneous speech. ESCA Workshop on Prosody.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (1995). Giving language a hand: gesture as a cue based communicative strategy. Working Papers, Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics, 44, 41–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish (Vol. 35). Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Some reasons for studying gesture and second language acquisition. Inter-national Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 44.103–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Multilingual multimodality: Communicative difficulties and their solutions in second-language use. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, 137–151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Gestures and second language acquisition. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body- Language- Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodsality in Human Interaction. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gullberg, M., & McCafferty, S. G. (2008). Introduction to gesture and SLA: Toward an integrated approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(2), 133–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gürbüz, N. (2017). Understanding fluency and disfluency in non-native speakers’ conversational English. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17(6), 1853–1874.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hai, T. (2017). Hesitation phenomena expressed in native Russian and Chinese and accented Russian* spontaneous speech. Phonetics Without Borders, 86–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2009). Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Bordeaux.
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Notebaert, L. (2009). Lexical access problems lead to disfluencies in speech. Experimental Psychology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 828–852. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, M. (2003). Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(2), 109–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2011). Gesture and institutional interaction. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, 276–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heldner, M., Hjalmarsson, A., & Edlund, J. (2013). Backchannel relevance spaces. Nordic Prosody XI, Tartu, Estonia, 15–17 August, 2012, 137–146.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heller, V. (2021). Embodied Displays of “Doing Thinking.” Epistemic and Interactive Functions of Thinking Displays in Children’s Argumentative Activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hieke, A. E. (1981). A Content-Processing View of Hesitation Phenomena. Language and Speech, 24(2), 147–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilton, H. (2009). Annotation and analyses of temporal aspects of spoken fluency. Calico Journal, 26(3), 644–661. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoetjes, M., & Van Maastricht, L. (2020). Using Gesture to Facilitate L2 Phoneme Acquisition: The Importance of Gesture and Phoneme Complexity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, E. M. (2015). Lapses: How people arrive at, and deal with, discontinuities in talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(4), 430–453. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Waiting to inhale: On sniffing in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 118–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, V. M. (1988). Hesitations and sentence planning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3(4), 323–361. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, B., Tellier, M., & Guichon, N. (2015, September). The use of teaching gestures in an online multimodal environment: The case of incomprehension sequences. Gesture and Speech in Interaction 4th Edition. [URL]
Horgues, C., & Scheuer, S. (2015). Why some things are better done in tandem. In Investigating English Pronunciation (pp. 47–82). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Misunderstanding as a two-way street: Communication breakdowns in native/non-native English/French tandem interactions. International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2017, 148.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hough, J., Tian, Y., De Ruiter, L., Betz, S., Kousidis, S., Schlangen, D., & Ginzburg, J. (2016). Duel: A multi-lingual multimodal dialogue corpus for disfluency, exclamations and laughter. 10th Edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hwang, J., Brennan, S. E., & Huffman, M. K. (2015). Phonetic adaptation in non-native spoken dialogue: Effects of priming and audience design. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 72–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibbotson, P. (2013). The scope of usage-based theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M., & Thelen, E. (1999). Hand, mouth and brain. The dynamic emergence of speech and gesture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11–12), 19–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 181–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, W. (1961). Measurements of oral reading and speaking rate and disfluency of adult male and female stutterers and nonstutterers. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders. Monograph Supplement.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahng, J. (2014). Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, 64(4), 809–854. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E. (2006). Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 26(6), 699–731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Færch, C. (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communication. Longman Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keevallik, L., & Ogden, R. (2020). Sounds on the Margins of Language at the Heart of Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M. (2009). Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. In A. W. Siegman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–210). Pergamon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion. Semiotica, 32(1/2), 81–117.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 247–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance (Cambridge University Press). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of ‘language.’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 2–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Languages as semiotically heterogenous systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A., & Versante, L. (2003). Pointing by hand in Neapolitan. Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet, 109–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S. (1993). Language and thought interface: A study of spontaneous gestures and Japanese mimetics. University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). How representational gestures help speaking. Language and Gesture, 1, 162–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S., Van Gijn, I., & Van der Hulst, H. (1997). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. International Gesture Workshop, 23–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G. (2003). Hesitation. In defence of er and erm. English Studies, 84(2), 170–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koester, A. (2010). Building small specialised corpora. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 1, 66–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosmala, L. (2020a). (Dis)fluencies and their contribution to the co-construction of meaning in native and non-native tandem interactions of French and English. TIPA. Travaux Interdisciplinaires Sur La Parole et Le Langage, 36, Article 36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020b). On the distribution of clicks and inbreaths in class presentations and spontaneous conversations: blending vocal and kinetic activities. Proceedings of Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). On the Specificities of L1 and L2 (Dis)fluencies and the Interactional Multimodal Strategies of L2 Speakers in Tandem Interactions. Journal of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosmala, L., & Morgenstern, A. (2017). A preliminary study of hesitation phenomena in L1 and L2 productions: A multimodal approach. Proceedings of DiSS 2017, the 8th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, 37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kowal, S., Wiese, R., & O’Connell, D. C. (1983). The use of time in storytelling. Language and Speech, 26(4), 377–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process. Language and Gesture, 2, 261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M., Dushay, R. A., Chen, Y., & Rauscher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gesture. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(6), 533–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M., & Hadar, U. (1999). The role of speech-related arm/hand gestures in word retrieval. In R. Campbell & L. Messing (Eds.), Gesture, speech, and sign (pp. 93–116). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2011). Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes. Revue de l’Association Française de Linguistique Cognitive, Volume 6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Recurrent gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body- Language- Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodsality in Human Interaction. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladewig, S. H., & Bressem, J. (2013). New insights into the medium hand: Discovering recurrent structures in gestures. Semiotica, 2013(197), 203–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977a). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 363–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1977b). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive grammar, vol. 1 theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Cognitive grammar. In Concise History of the Language Sciences (pp. 364–368). Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LeBaron, C. D., Mandelbaum, J., & Glenn, P. J. (2003). An overview of language and social interaction research. Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 12–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. (1992). Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15(3), 247–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Producing spoken language. The Neurocognition of Language, 83–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J., & Schriefers, H. (1987). Stages of lexical access. In Natural language generation (pp. 395–404). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, E. T., & McNeill, D. (1992). Speech, gesture, and discourse. Discourse Processes, 15(3), 277–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lickley, R. J. (2001). Dialogue moves and disfluency rates. ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Fluency and Disfluency. In M. A. Redford (Ed.), The Handbook of Speech Production (pp. 445–474). John Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lopez-Ozieblo, R. (2019). Cut-offs and co-occurring gestures: Similarities between speakers’ first and second languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1(ahead-of-print).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Proposing a revised functional classification of pragmatic gestures. Lingua, 247, 1–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, W., & Winke, P. (2019). Self-assessment: How reliable is it in assessing oral proficiency over time? Foreign Language Annals, 52(1), 66–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maclay, H., & Osgood, C. E. (1959). Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15(1), 19–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. transcription format and programs (Vol. 1). Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matzinger, T., Ritt, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2020). Non-native speaker pause patterns closely correspond to those of native speakers at different speech rates. PloS One, 15(4), e0230710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazeland, H. (2006). Conversation analysis. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 3, 153–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCafferty, S. G. (1998). Nonverbal expression and L2 private speech. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 73–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Space for cognition: Gesture and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 148–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. (2009). Rethinking spoken fluency. ELIA, 9, 11–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLaughlin, S. F., & Cullinan, W. L. (1989). Disfluencies, utterance length, and linguistic complexity in nonstuttering children. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 14(1), 17–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92(3), 350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menn, L., & Dronkers, N. F. (2016). Psycholinguistics: Introduction and applications. Plural Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, S., & Barbosa, P. A. (2010). Hesitation phenomena: A dynamical perspective. Cognitive Processing, 11(3), 251–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, S., & Mansur, L. L. (2004). Descriptive discourse: Topic familiarity and disfluencies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37(6), 489–503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meteer, M. W., Taylor, A. A., MacIntyre, R., & Iyer, R. (1995). Dysfluency annotation stylebook for the switchboard corpus. University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michel, M. C. (2011). Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance. Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance, 2, 141–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Effects of task complexity and task condition on Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 241–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2001). Pour une linguistique interactionnelle. Marges Linguistiques, 1, 142–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 194–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-in-interaction. Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional and Cognitive Perspectives, 247–275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L., & Pekarek-Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(4), 461–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L., & Traverso, V. (2005). (Dés) alignements en clôture. Une étude interactionnelle de corpus de français parlé en interaction. Lidil. Revue de Linguistique et de Didactique Des Langues, 31, 35–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moniz, H. (2019). Processing disfluencies in distinct speaking styles: Idiosyncrasies and transversality. The 9th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, 1–2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moniz, H., Batista, F., Mata, A. I., & Trancoso, I. (2014). Speaking style effects in the production of disfluencies. Speech Communication, 65, 20–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moniz, H. (2013). Processing disfluencies in European Portuguese [Unpublished PhD Thesis] Universidade de Lisboa.
Moniz, H., Trancoso, I., & Mata, A. I. (2009). Classification of disfluent phenomena as fluent communicative devices in specific prosodic contexts. Tenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morel, M. A., & Danon-Boileau, L. (1998). Grammaire de l’intonation l’exemple du français. Editions OPHRYS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A. (2014). Children’s multimodal language development. Manual of Language Acquisition, 123–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). The Other’s Voice in the Co-Construction of Self-Reference in the Dialogic Child. Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos Do Discurso, 16, 63–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A., Caët, S., Debras, C., Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., & Le Mené, M. (2021). Children’s socialization to multi-party interactive practices: Who talks to whom about what in family dinners. In Letizia Caronia (ed.) Language and Social Interaction at Home and in School. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 46–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 195–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moro, L., Mortimer, E. F., & Tiberghien, A. (2020). The use of social semiotic multimodality and joint action theory to describe teaching practices: Two cases studies with experienced teachers. Classroom Discourse, 11(3), 229–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (1998). Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte, Theorie, Sprachvergleich (Vol. 1). Spitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Gesture as ‘deliberate expressive movement.’ From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance: Essays in Honor of Adam Kendon, 127–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C., Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H. (2013). Towards a grammar of gestures: A form-based view. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body- Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 707–733). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. B. M. (2007). Disfluency in dialogue: Attention, structure and function [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Edinburgh.
Notarrigo, I. (2017). Marqueurs de (dis) fluence en langue des signes de Belgique francophone [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Université de Namur.
Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 66–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The actions of peripheral linguistic objects: Clicks. Proceedings of Laughter Workshop 2018, 2–5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, D. (1992). Analysis of False Starts in Spontaneous Speech. The International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oviatt, S. (1995). Predicting spoken disfluencies during human-computer interaction. Computer Speech and Language, 9(1), 19–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallaud, B., Bertrand, R., Prevot, L., Blache, P., & Rauzy, S. (2019). Suspensive and Disfluent Self Interruptions in French Language Interactions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallaud, B., Rauzy, S., & Blache, P. (2013). Auto-interruptions et disfluences en français parlé dans quatre corpus du CID. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage, 29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papanas, N., Maltezos, E., & Lazarides, M. K. (2011). Delivering a powerful oral presentation: All the world’s a stage. International Angiology: A Journal of the International Union of Angiology, 30(2), 185–191.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek-Doehler, S. (2006). «CA for SLA»: Analyse conversationnelle et recherche sur l’acquisition des langues. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 11(2), 123–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 3–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek-Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2011). Developing “methods” for interaction: A cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. L2 Interactional Competence and Development, 56, 206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peltonen, P. (2017). L2 fluency in spoken interaction: A case study on the use of other-repetitions and collaborative completions. AFinLA-e: Soveltavan Kielitieteen Tutkimuksia, 10, 118–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Gestures as Fluency-enhancing Resources in L2 Interaction: A Case Study on Multimodal Fluency. Fluency in L2 Learning and Use, 138, 111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Individual and Interactional Speech Fluency in L2 English from a Problem-solving Perspective: A Mixed-methods Approach [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. University of Turku.
Peters, A. M. (2001). Filler syllables: What is their status in emerging grammar? Journal of Child Language, 28(1), 229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinto, D., & Vigil, D. (2019). Searches and clicks in Peninsular Spanish. Pragmatics, 29(1), 83–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poggi, I. (2001). From a typology of gestures to a procedure for gesture production. International Gesture Workshop, 158–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 57–108). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (2011). Conversation analysis: An approach to the analysis of social interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 2, 165–190.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasier, L., & Hiligsmann, P. (2007). Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodological issues. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 28(2007), 41–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rendle-Short, J. (2005). Managing the transitions between talk and silence in the academic monologue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(2), 179–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riazantseva, A. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing a study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(04), 497–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14(4), 423–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohr, J. L. (2016). Acoustic and Perceptual Correlates of L2 Fluency: The Role of Prolongations [PhD Thesis].
Rohrer, P. L., Vilà-Giménez, I., Florit-Pons, J., Esteve-Gibert, N., Ren, A., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Prieto, P. (2020). The MultiModal MultiDimensional (M3D) labelling scheme for the annotation of audiovisual corpora. Gesture and Speech in Interaction (GESPIN).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, R. L. (1998). The communicative value of filled pauses in spontaneous speech [M.A Diss.]. University of Birminghman.
Rossano, F. (2013). Gaze in Conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of Conversation Analysis. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rydell, M. (2019). Negotiating co-participation: Embodied word searching sequences in paired L2 speaking tests. Journal of Pragmatics, 149, 60–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation (Vol. 1–2). Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Jefferson, G., & Schegloff, E. A. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schachter, S., Christenfeld, N., & Bilous, F. (1991). Speech Disfluency and the Structure of Knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 362–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996a). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I (Vol. 1). Cambridge university press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Some other “uh(m)” s. Discourse Processes, 47(2), 130–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schettino, L., Di Maro, M., & Cutugno, F. (2020). Silent pauses as clarification trigger. Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheuer, S., & Horgues, C. (2020). Potential pitfalls of interpreting data from English-French tandem conversations. Interpreting Languagelearning Data, 197.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnadt, M. J., & Corley, M. (2006). The influence of lexical, conceptual and planning based factors on disfluency production. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 28(28).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, U. (2014). Frequency, Hesitations and Chunks. A Usage-based Study of Chunking in English. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (2016). Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 79–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, M., Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E., & Selting, M. (2010). Prosody in interaction. Prosody in Interaction, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 3–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seo, M.-S., & Koshik, I. (2010). A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2219–2239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seyfeddinipur, M. (2006). Disfluency: Interrupting speech and gesture [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Radboud University.
Seyfeddinipur, M., & Kita, S. (2001). Gesture as an indicator of early error detection in self-monitoring of speech. ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shames, G. H., & Sherrick, C. E. (1963). A discussion of nonfluency and stuttering as operant behavior. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 28(1), 3–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shriberg, E. (2001). To ‘errrr’is human: Ecology and acoustics of speech disfluencies. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(1), 153–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Acoustic properties of disfluent repetitions. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 4, 384–387.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Disfluencies in switchboard. Proceedings of International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 96(1), 11–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shriberg, E. E. (1994). Preliminaries to a Theory of Speech Disfiuencies [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. University of California.
Sidnell, J. (2016). Conversation Analysis. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverman, K., Blaauw, E., Spitz, J., & Pitrelli, J. F. (1992). A prosodic comparison of spontaneous speech and read speech. Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, R., Eisenchlas, S., & Haugh, M. (2013). The functions of self-initiated self-repair in the second language Chinese classroom 1. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 144–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 167–185). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for speaking. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 435–445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sloetjes, H., & Wittenburg, P. (2008). Annotation by category-ELAN and ISO DCR. 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, V. L., & Clark, H. H. (1993). On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 25–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stam, G. (2001). Lexical failure and gesture in second language development. In C. Cavé, I. Guaïtella, & S. Santi (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication (pp. 271–275). L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Thinking for speaking about motion: L1 and L2 speech and gesture. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). What gestures reveal about second language acquisition. Gesture: Second Language Acquistion and Classroom Research, 231.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Gesture and speaking a second language. Speaking in a Second Language, 49, 67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stam, G., & Tellier, M. (2017). The sound of silence. Why Gesture?: How the Hands Function in Speaking, Thinking and Communicating, 7, 353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sterponi, L., & Fasulo, A. (2010). “How to go on”: Intersubjectivity and progressivity in the communication of a child with autism. Ethos, 38(1), 116–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Coding social interaction: A heretical approach in conversation analysis? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(1), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35(3), 367–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J. (2005). Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 2005, 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (2008a). Depicting by gesture. Gesture, 8(3), 285–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 154–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008c). Metaphor and gesture. A view from the microanalysis of interaction. In C. Müller & A. Cienki (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 259–264). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009a). Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 161–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009b). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Ecologies of gesture. New Adventures in Language and Interaction, 223–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Mutual gaze and recognition. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (Eds.), From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance. Benjamins, Amsterdam (pp. 35–55). Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Embodiment in human communication. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 419–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Self-Touch as Sociality. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). The emancipation of gestures. Interactional Linguistics, 1(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, J., & Hartge, U. (1992). Gestures at the transition place. In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 135–157). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1998). Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. In Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Looking at space to study mental spaces. Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, 18, 201–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E., & Sizemore, M. (2008). Personal and interpersonal gesture spaces: Functional contrasts in language and gesture. Language in the Context of Use: Discourse and Cognitive Approaches to Language, 25–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E., & Stec, K. (2016). Maintaining multiple viewpoints with gaze. Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, 237, 257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swerts, M. (1998). Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 485–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szymanski, M. H. (1999). Re-engaging and dis-engaging talk in activity. Language in Society, 28(1), 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage 1. Language Learning, 30(2), 417–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P. (2011). Pausing patterns: Differences between L2 learners and native speakers. ELT Journal, 65(1), 71–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tellier, M. (2008a). Dire avec des gestes. Le Français Dans Le Monde. Recherches et Applications, 44, 40–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tellier, M., & Stam, G. (2012). Stratégies verbales et gestuelles dans l’explication lexicale d’un verbe d’action. In Rivière, V. Spécificités et diversité des interactions didactiques. Paris : Riveneuve éditions. 357 – 374.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tellier, M., Stam, G., & Bigi, B. (2013). Gesturing while pausing in conversation: Self-oriented or partner-oriented?”. The Combined Meeting of the 10th International Gesture Workshop and the 3rd Gesture and Speech in Interaction Conference, Tillburg (The Netherlands).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard university press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tottie, G. (2011). Uh and Um as sociolinguistic markers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), 173–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). On the use of uh and um in American English. Functions of Language, 21(1), 6–29. R. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Uh and um in British and American English: Are they words? Evidence from co-occurrence with pauses. In N. Dion, A. Lapierre, & R. T. Cacoullos (Eds.), Linguistic Variation: Confronting Fact and Theory (pp. 38–55). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Planning what to say: Uh and um among the pragmatic markers. In G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer, & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside the Clause. Form and function of extra-clausal constituents. (pp. 97–122). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). From pause to word: Uh, um and er in written American English. English Language & Linguistics, 23(1), 105–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasilescu, I., & Adda-Decker, M. (2007). A cross-language study of acoustic and prosodic characteristics of vocalic hesitations. Fundamentals of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication and the Biometric Issue, 18, 140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaughan, E., & Clancy, B. (2013). Small corpora and pragmatics. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 (pp. 53–73). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, M., & Rose, R. (2012). Pausology and hesitation phenomena in second language acquisition. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition, 480–483.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witton-Davies, G. (2014). The study of fluency and its development in monologue and dialogue [PhD Thesis]. Lancaster University.
Wood, D. (2001). In search of fluency: What is it and how can we teach it? Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(4), 573–589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2005). Studies of the phonetics-interaction interface: Clicks and interactional structures in English conversation [PhD Thesis]. University of York.
(2011). On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(2), 207–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018). Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. Bilingual Cognition and Language: The State of the Science across Its Subfields, 54, 37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yasinnik, Y., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Veilleux, N. (2005). Gesture marking of disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Baills, F., & Prieto, P. (2020). Hand-clapping to the rhythm of newly learned words improves L2 pronunciation: Evidence from training Chinese adolescents with French words. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 666–689. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuniga, M., & Simard, D. (2019). Factors influencing L2 self-repair behavior: The role of L2 proficiency, attentional control and L1 self-repair behavior. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(1), 43–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue