Cover not available

Article published In: Reflexivity in Late Modernity: Accounts from linguistic ethnographies of youth
Edited by Miguel Pérez-Milans
[AILA Review 29] 2016
► pp. 114–140

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

The reflexive imperative among high-achieving adolescents

A Flemish case study

 | Ghent University, Belgium
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 7 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.29.05van
The socio-cultural conditions of late modernity induce a “reflexive imperative” amongst young people, which also results in metapragmatic and metalinguistic behaviour, as has been demonstrated by linguistic ethnographers (LE). However, recent LE studies on reflexivity in Western European settings have mainly focused on how groups of socially low-status, geographically mobile and multilingual youth are involved in creative linguistic processes in which the disapproval of their linguistic hybridity is denounced. In this paper, based on a linguistic-ethnographic study, I will uncover the influence of the reflexive imperative on a different group: six high-achieving, white, elite, male, adolescent pupils in Flemish Belgium. Through a micro-analysis of their metacommentaries and speech practices, I describe the subtle metalinguistic and metapragmatic moves of the pupils, which demonstrate their attitude towards standard language use at school. An analysis of these boys’ linguistic reflexivity demonstrates a complex attitude towards Standard Dutch and Standard Language Ideology: at first sight, they seem to incline towards linguistic equality, resulting in a relaxation of the standard norm. However, an analysis of the more indirect metapragmatic practices of these boys reveals how they strategically use the symbolic capital of Standard Dutch, a practice which echoes the Flemish language-in-education policy and might serve to preserve (or prepare) their (future) elite position in society.
References (48)
Archer, M. S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauman, R. 1987. The role of performance in the ethnography of speaking. Working Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psychosocial Studies 111: 3–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2007. On scope and depth in linguistic ethnography. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (5): 682–688. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Raisons d’Agir.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. 1999. “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28 (2): 203–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. White Kids. Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupland, N. 2001. Dialect stylisation in radio talk. Language in Society 30 (3): 345–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupland, N. & Kristiansen, T. 2011. SLICE: Critical perspectives on language (de)standardisation. In Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe, T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (eds), 11–35. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Amato, J. 1993. Resistance and compliance in minority classrooms. In Minority Education: Anthropological Perspectives, E. Jacob & C. Jordan (eds), 181–207. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’hoker, M. & Henkens, B. 2005. Van segmentering naar convergentie. Structuur en karakter van het secundair onderwijs in België in de 20ste eeuw. In Paradoxen van pedagogisering. Handboek pedagogische historiografie, M. Depaepe, F. Simon & A. Van Gorp (eds), 159–176. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delarue, S. 2013. Teachers’ Dutch in Flanders: The last guardians of the standard? In Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies, T. Kristiansen & S. Grondelaers (eds), 193–226. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delarue, S. & De Caluwe, J. 2015. Eliminating social inequality by reinforcing standard language ideology? Language policy for Dutch in Flemish schools. Current Issues in Language Planning 16 (1–2): 8–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delarue, S. & Van Lancker, I. 2016. De kloof overbruggen tussen een strikt onderwijstaalbeleid en een taaldiverse klaspraktijk: Strategieën van Vlaamse leraren en leerlingen. TNTL 132 (2): 85–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deumert, A. & Vandenbussche, W. 2003. Germanic Standardizations. Past to Present [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and self-identiy. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grondelaers, S. & van Hout, R. 2011. The standard language situation in the Low Countries: Top-down and bottom-up variations on a diaglossic theme. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 23 (3): 199–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heller, M. 2008. Doing ethnography. In Blackwell Guide to Research Methods in Bilingualism and Multilingualism, L. Wei & M. Moyer (eds), 249–262. Malden MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1964. Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist 66 (6): 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaspers, J. 2005. Tegenwerken, belachelijk doen. Talige sabotage van Marokkaanse jongens op een Antwerpse middelbare school. Brussel: VUBPress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Stylizing Standard Dutch by Moroccan boys in Antwerp. Linguistics and Education 17 (2): 131–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Strange bedfellows: Appropriations of a tainted urban dialect. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15 (4): 493–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Stylisations as teacher practice. Language in Society 43 (4): 371–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. N. 2008. Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism 5 (3): 161–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lybaert, C. 2014. Het gesproken Nederlands in Vlaanderen: Percepties en attitudes van een spraakmakende generatie. Gent: Universiteit Gent.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Madsen, L. M. 2014. Heteroglossia, voicing and social categorisation. In Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy, A. Blackledge & A. Creese (eds), 41–58. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín Rojo, L. 2010. Constructing Inequality in Multilingual Classrooms. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehan, H. 1985. The structure of classroom discourse. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 3: Discourse and Dialogue, T. A. van Dijk (ed.), 119–131. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 2001. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (4): 530–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. 1985. Authority in Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolini, D. 2009. Zooming in and zooming out: A package of method and theory to study work practices. In Organizational Ethnography: Studying the Complexity of Everyday Life, S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels & F. H. Kamsteeg (eds), 120–138. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, M., De Clerck, B. & Colleman, T. 2014. The emergence of non-canonical degree modifiers in non-standard varieties of Dutch: A constructionalization perspective. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, R. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (eds), 207–250. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Milans, M. 2015. Language education policy in late modernity: (Socio)linguistic ethnographies in the European Union. Language Policy 14 (2): 99–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 1995. Crossing. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Critique in interaction. Critique of Anthropology 21 (1): 83–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Crossing. Language & Ethnicity among Adolescents. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Language in Late Modernity. Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Linguistic ethnography, interactional sociolinguistics and the study of identities. In Apllied Linguistics Methods: A Reader, T. L. Coffin & K. O’Halloran (eds), 234–250. London: Routledge/Open University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A. & Lytra, V. 2004. UK Linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. <[URL]>
Silverstein, M. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, J. A. Lucy (ed.), 33–58. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smet, P. 2011. Samen taalgrezen verleggen. Conceptnota. <[URL]>
Van De Mieroop, D., Zenner, E. & Marzo, S. 2016. Standard and Colloquial Belgian Dutch pronouns of adress: A variationist-interactional study of child-directed speech in dinner table interactions. Folia Linguistica 50 (1): 31–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Lancker, I. 2016. Standardizing and destandardizing practices at a Flemish secondary school. A sociolinguistic ethnographic perspective on Flemish pupils’ speech practices. Taal en Tongval 641.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandekerckhove, R. 2005. Patterns of variation and convergence in the West-Flemish dialects. In Moderne Dialekte – Neue Dialektologie, E. Eggers, J. E. Schmidt & D. Stellmacher (eds), 535–552. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandenbroucke, F. 2007. De lat hoog voor talen in iedere school. Goed voor de sterken, sterk voor de zwakken. <[URL]>
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Shahri, Naseh Nasrollahi & Valeriya Minakova
2021. Reflexive engagement with social meanings through registers. Linguistics and Education 64 ► pp. 100926 ff. DOI logo
Rosiers, Kirsten, Inge Van Lancker & Steven Delarue
2018. Beyond the traditional scope of translanguaging. Language & Communication 61 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue