Article published In: Reflexivity in Late Modernity: Accounts from linguistic ethnographies of youth
Edited by Miguel Pérez-Milans
[AILA Review 29] 2016
► pp. 48–82
Reflexive language and ethnic minority activism in Hong Kong
A trajectory-based analysis
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 7 February 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.29.03per
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.29.03per
This article engages with Archer’s call to further research on reflexivity and social change under conditions of late modernity (2007,
2010, 2012) from the perspective of existing work on reflexive discourse in the language disciplines (Silverstein 1976, Lucy 1993). Drawing
from a linguistic ethnography of the networked trajectories of a group of working-class South Asian youth in Hong Kong (Pérez-Milans &
Soto 2014), we analyze the trajectory of Sita, a Hong Kong-born young female with Nepali background. In her trajectory, performative acts of
ethnic minority-based activism emerge as key in the enactment of a given set of values, stances, types of persona and situated forms of
alignment/disalignment. That is to say, Sita’s enactment of activism is seen in this article as tied to a discourse register (Agha
2007: 147). As such, ‘talking/doing activism’ is inter-textually linked to a speech chain network of a group of secondary school students,
teachers, researchers and community-based minority activists engaged with Sita in various interrelated projects for social empowerment.
Analysis of interview transcripts, online chats and multimodal artifacts shows the extent to which the coordinated formation of this
discourse register proved useful in providing Sita with relevant cultural capital (Bourdieu 1986) with which she shaped her own academic
trajectory, from a low-prestige government-subsidized secondary school to an elite international college. Data also point towards the need
for further engagement with recent invitations to re-imagining identity and social action under current conditions of diversification
(Blommaert 2013).
Keywords: trajectory, identity, minority education, discourse register, enregisterment, diversity, Hong Kong
References (51)
Appadurai, A. 1990. Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture and Society 7 (2): 295–310.
Archer, M. S. 2007. Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: CUP.
2013. Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes. Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
2016. Commentary: Indonesia, its youth and ‘light communities’ [Tilburg Working Papers in Culture Studies, Paper 162]. <[URL]>
2016b. New forms of diaspora, new forms of integration [Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, Paper 160]. <[URL]>
Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J. Richardson (ed.), 241–258. NewYork NY: Greenwood.
Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. J. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Caetano, A. 2014. Defining personal reflexivity: A critical reading of Archer’s approach. European Journal of Social Theory 18 (1): 1–16.
Copland, F. & Creese, A. 2015. Linguistic Ethnography. Collecting, Analysing and Presenting Data. London: Sage.
Creese, A. 2008. Linguistic ethnography. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 101: Research Methods in Language and Education, 2nd edn, K. A. King & N. H. Hornberger (eds), 229–241. Dordrecht: Springer.
Duchêne, A., Moyer, M. & Roberts, C. 2013. Language, Migration and Social Inequalities: A Critical Sociolinguistic Perspective on Institutions and Work. London: Multilingual Matters.
Erni, J. N. & Leung, L. Y. M. 2014. Understanding South Asian Minorities in Hong Kong, Vol. 11. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Fleming, K. 2015. Ideology, Identity and Linguistic Repertoires among South Asian Students in Hong Kong. PhD dissertation, The University of Hong Kong. <[URL]>
Flowerdew, J. 2004. The discursive construction of a world-class city. Discourse & Society 15 (5): 579–605.
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2007. Distributed knowledge, distributed power: A sociolinguistics of structuration. Text & Talk 27 (5–6): 633–653.
Hymes, D. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Pennsylvania PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kennedy, K. J. 2012. Immigration and Hong Kong: ‘New Immigrants’ and Ethnic Minorities. UNESCO-KEDI Regional Policy Seminar – Education Policy: Making in the Age of Migration in Asia and the Pacific, July.
Kubota, R. 2014. The Multi/Plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 1–22.
Leung, Y. Y. M. 2013. Education Reform in Hong Kong: Power-status, School Strategy and Social Inequality. PhD dissertation, The University of Hong Kong. <[URL]>
Maly, I. & Varis, P. 2015. The 21st-century hipster: On micro-populations in times of superdiversity. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1–17.
May, S. (ed.). 2014. The Multilingual Turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and Bilingual Education. New York NY: Routledge.
Pérez-Milans, M. 2015. Language education policy in late modernity: (Socio) linguistic ethnographies in the European Union. Language Policy 14 (2): 99–107.
2016. Language and identity in linguistic ethnography. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity, S. Preece (ed.), 83–97. Abingdon: Routledge.
Pérez-Milans, M. & Soto, C. 2014. Everyday practices, everyday pedagogies: A dialogue on critical transformations in a multilingual Hong Kong school. In Reflexivity in Language and Intercultural Education: Rethinking Multilingualism and Interculturality, J. Byrd Clark & F. Dervin (eds), 213–233. New York NY: Routledge.
Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A. & Lytra, V. 2004. UK linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. <[URL]>
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 696–735.
Silverstein, M. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Meaning and Anthropology, Keith H. Basso & Henry A. Selby (eds). New York NY: Harper & Row.
2005. Axes of evals: Token versus type interdiscursivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 6–22.
Soto, C. 2016. Empowering Low-income Ethnic Minority Students in Hong Kong through Critical Pedagogy: Limits and Possibilities in Theory and Practice. PhD dissertation, The University of Hong Kong. <[URL]>
Tusting, K. & Maybin, J. 2007. Linguistic ethnography and interdisciplinarity: Opening the discussion. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (5): 575–583.
Urciuoli, B. 2003. Excellence, leadership, skills, diversity: Marketing liberal arts education. Language & Communication 231: 385–408.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Chan, Hon Leung Clement
Merminod, Gilles & Raymund Vitorio
Pérez-Milans, Miguel
Rowlett, Benedict J.L.
Lundqvist, Ulla
Soto, Carlos
Soto, Carlos & Miguel Pérez-Milans
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
