Article published In: Theory in Applied Linguistics Research: Critical approaches to production, performance and participation
Edited by Theresa Lillis
[AILA Review 28] 2015
► pp. 127–150
The politics of English, language and uptake
The case of international academic journal article reviews
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 14 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.06lil
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.06lil
Drawing on 95 text histories from a longitudinal project on writing for publication in 4 national contexts, this article analyses the language ideologies enacted in referees’ and editors’ comments on articles submitted for publication in English-medium ‘international’ journals. It considers how orientations to ‘English’, ‘language’ and ‘language work’ are enacted in practices of reviewer uptake and the consequences of such practices for knowledge production, evaluation and circulation. In exploring evaluation practices, the article problematizes three foundational categories in applied linguistics: (1) The treating of English as a single stable semiotic resource over which the ‘native’ speaker is attributed a privileged evaluative position; (2) The overriding transparency approach to language and communication; (3) The focus on production as distinct from uptake.
References (43)
Agar, M.H. 1996. The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography, 2nd rev. edn. New York NY: Academic Press.
Aktas, R. & Cortes, V. 2008. Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1): 3–14.
Belcher, D. 2007. Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing 161: 1–22.
Berkenkotter, B. & Hanganu-Bresch, C. 2011. Lunatic asylum occult genres and the certification of madness in the 19th century. Written Communication 281: 220–250.
Bourdieu, P. 1985. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J.G. Richardson (ed.), 241–258. New York NY: Greenwood.
. 1987. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, R. Nice (transl.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Casanave, C.P. 2008. The stigmatizing effect of Goffman’s stigma label: A response to John Flowerdew. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71: 264–267.
Connor, U. & Mauranen, A. 1999. Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes 18(1): 47–62.
Curry, M.J. & Lillis, T. 2010. Academic research networks: Accessing resources for English-medium publishing. English for Specific Purposes 29(4): 281–295.
Englander, K. 2009. Transformation of the identities of nonnative English-speaking scientists as a consequence of the social construction of revision. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 81: 35–53.
Flowerdew, J. 2008. Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman’s “stigma” tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71: 77–86.
Fortanet-Gómez, I. 2008a. Evaluative language in peer review referee reports. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71: 27–37.
. 2008b. Strategies for teaching and learning an occluded genre: The RA referee report. In English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication, S. Burgess & P. Martin-Martin (eds), 19–38. Bern: Peter Lang.
Fraenkel, B. 2001. La résistible ascension de l’écrit au travail. In Langage et Travail, Communication, Cognition, Action, A. Borzeix & B. Fraenkel (eds), 113–142. Paris: CNRS Editions.
Giannoni, D.S. 2008. Medical writing at the periphery: The case of Italian journal editorials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71: 97–107.
Gosden, H. 2003. ‘Why not give us the full story?’ Functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 21: 87–101.
Harwood, N. 2005a. “I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever”: Discussing methods in computing science using I. English for Specific Purposes 241: 243–267.
. 2005b. “Nowhere has anyone attempted... In this article I do just that”: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 371: 1027–1231.
Hewings, M. 2004. An ‘important contribution’ or ‘tiresome reading’? A study of evaluation in peer reviews in journal article submissions. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(3): 247–274.
Kourilova, M. 1998. Communicative characteristics of reviews of scientific papers written by non-native users of English. Endocrine Regulations 321: 107–114.
Lillis, T. 2008 Ethnography as method, methodology, and ‘deep theorizing’: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication 25(3): 353–388.
. 2012. English medium writing for academic purposes: Foundational categories, certainty and contingency. In Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language: Issues and Challenges Facing ESL/EFL Academic Writers in Higher Education Contexts, R. Tang (ed.), 235–247. London: Continuum.
Lillis, T. & Curry, M.J. 2006a. Reframing notions of competence in scholarly writing: From individual to networked activity. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 531: 63–78.
. 2006b. Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication 23(1): 3–35.
. 2010. Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. London: Routledge.
Lillis, T., Hewings, A., Vladimirou, D. & Curry, M.J. 2010. The geolinguistics of English as an academic lingua franca: Citation practices across English-medium national and English-medium international journals. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20(1): 111–135.
Lillis, T. & McKinney, C. 2013. The sociolinguistics of writing in a global context: Objects, lenses, consequences. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(4): 415–439.
Lillis, T. & Turner, J. 2001. Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education 6(1): 57–68.
Mauranen, A. 2013. Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet. Nordic Journal of English Studies 13(1):7–36.
Mungra, P. & Webber, P. 2010. Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments. English for Specific Purposes 291: 43–53.
Paltridge, B. 2013. Referees’ comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: When is a suggestion not a suggestion? Studies in Higher Education 40(1): 106–122.
Sarangi, S. & Candlin, C. 2003. Categorisation and explanation of risk: A discourse analytical perspective. Health, Risk & Society 5(2): 115–228.
Shehzad, W. 2006. How to end an introduction in a computer science article: A corpus-based approach. In Language and Computers, Corpus Linguistics beyond the Word: Corpus Linguistics from Phrase to Discourse, E. Fitzpatrick (ed.), 227–241. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
. 2009. Worlds of genre-metaphors of genre. In Genre in a Changing World, C. Bazerman, A. Bonini & D. Figueiredo (eds), 1–16. Anderson SC: Parlor Press. Available at the WAC Clearinghouse <[URL]>
Cited by (64)
Cited by 64 other publications
Anikina, Zhanna, Ksenia Girfanova & Liubov Goncharova
Kashiha, Hadi
Kawase, Tomoyuki
2025. Move combinations in the conclusion section of applied linguistics research articles. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 35:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
Shafi, Adeela ahmed
Tuck, Jackie
Wang, Yixuan
Aleksiejuk, Katarzyna
Belcher, Diane
2024. The promising and problematic potential of generative AI as a leveler of the publishing playing field. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 5:1-2 ► pp. 93 ff.
Chauke, Ezekiel & Khashane Stephen Malatji
Menga, Filippo
Warren, Leiry K. & Masatoshi Sato
Makena, Bulelwa & Nomasomi Hilda Matiso
Peters, Uwe
Soler, Josep, Iker Erdocia & Kristof Savski
Strauss, Pat & Emmanuel Manalo
2023. “Most good papers are published in English”. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 4:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Xu, Xiatinghan
Burgess, Sally
Kim, Dongbin, Sung-Sang Yoo, Heekwon Sohn & Erin L. Sonneveldt
Pawlicka, Aleksandra, Michał Choraś & Marek Pawlicki
Raitskaya, Lilia & Elena Tikhonova
Shaw, Oliver
2022. Mediation and uptake in manuscript revision. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1 ► pp. 6 ff.
Smirnova, Natalia & Theresa Lillis
2022. Citation in global academic knowledge making. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1 ► pp. 78 ff.
Zhang, Ting & Mary Jane Curry
Abdeljaoued, Marii & Tahar Labassi
Bardi, Mirela
Edo-Marzá, Nuria
2021. Academic writing and publishing. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Getahun, Dawit Asrat, Waheed Hammad & Anna Robinson-Pant
Mendoza, Arturo, Viviana Oropeza, Daniel Rodríguez, Zazil Sobrevilla & Joaquín Martínez
2021. Challenges, feelings, and attitudes towards writing in ERPP in semi-periphery countries. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 2:2 ► pp. 129 ff.
Rodríguez, Alma D., Sandra I. Musanti & Alyssa G. Cavazos
Shleykina, Galina & Frances Junnier
2021. Translating authorial presence. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 2:2 ► pp. 104 ff.
Smirnova, Natalia V., Theresa Lillis & Anna Kristina Hultgren
Soler, Josep
2021. Linguistic injustice in academic publishing in English. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 2:2 ► pp. 160 ff.
Demeter, Márton
Eve, Martin Paul, Cameron Neylon, Daniel Paul O'Donnell, Samuel Moore, Robert Gadie, Victoria Odeniyi & Shahina Parvin
Lei, Siyu & Ruiying Yang
Lillis, Theresa, Maria Leedham & Alison Twiner
Monteiro, Kátia & Eliana Hirano
Starks, Donna & Howard Nicholas
Broekhoff, Marna
Corcoran, James
Curry, Mary Jane & Theresa Lillis
Flowerdew, John
Hanauer, David I., Cheryl L. Sheridan & Karen Englander
Hultgren, Anna Kristina
Hultgren, Anna Kristina
Nygaard, Lynn P.
Tardy, Christine M.
Hynninen, Niina
Hynninen, Niina
Hynninen, Niina
Hynninen, Niina
2022. Opening up the peer review process. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Hynninen, Niina
Lillis, Theresa
Lillis, Theresa & Mary Jane Curry
Lillis, Theresa & Mary Jane Curry
2022. The dynamics of academic knowledge making in a multilingual world. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Rai, Lucy
2018. How to Get Published in a Peer Reviewed Journal: Reflections on Panel Discussion at the International Council for Open and Distance Education: World Conference on Online Learning 16–19th October 2017, Toronto, Canada. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 33:1 ► pp. 70 ff.
Hynninen, Niina & Maria Kuteeva
Paltridge, Brian
Paltridge, Brian
Paltridge, Brian
Paltridge, Brian
2023. Writing a book proposal. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 4:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
