Article published In: Decolonial Approaches to Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Applied Linguistics: Addressing local and global EDI challenges
Edited by Kyria Finardi, Marina Orsini-Jones and Azirah Hashim
[AILA Review 38:2] 2025
► pp. 294–323
Longitudinal civic engagement
Undergraduate students’ reflections on an intergenerational virtual exchange
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Northeastern University.
Published online: 11 December 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24045.fuc
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24045.fuc
Abstract
Educators have underscored the synergy between language education and civic engagement due to the potential of
enhancing students’ linguistic and cultural growth through participating in social action, which is where languages and
communities converge (e.g., Palpacuer Lee, C., Curtis, J. H., & Curran, M. E. (2018). Shaping
the vision for service-learning in language education. Foreign Language
Annals, 511, 169–184. ). Virtual exchange can
facilitate such engagement by reaching global communities. We present findings from a longitudinal intergenerational virtual civic
engagement between intermediate-level undergraduate learners of German at a private research institution on the East Coast in the
U.S. and older adults in Germany. Participants engaged with tandem partners via Zoom or WhatsApp. Particular focus is on three
returning tandem partnerships. The exploratory study is part of a larger program (Fuchs, C. (2024). Intergenerational
service-learning through virtual exchange across a foreign language program. Journal of Virtual
Exchange, 71, 107–122, ) and situates itself within a sociocultural framework for telecollaboration (Dooly, M., & O’Dowd, R. (2012). Researching
online foreign language interaction and exchange in foreign language education: Introduction to the
volume. In M. Dooly & R. O’Dowd (Eds.), Researching
online foreign language interaction and
exchange (pp. 11–41). Peter Lang. ). Both authors were participant-observers (Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative
inquiry in TESOL. Palgrave Macmillan. ). Our research set out to explore the following questions: (1) How do university language students in returning
tandem partnerships perceive their virtual civic engagements with older adults in Germany? (2) How do all students perceive the
impact of their civic engagement on their academic experience in relation to the course? Qualitative data were coded by the
authors using NVivo 12. Findings suggest that returning tandem partnerships can be particularly helpful, especially for
lower-level students, as evidenced in students’ reflections on their perspective changes, comfort levels, and the overall impact
of the intergenerational exchanges.
Article outline
- 1.Intergenerational civic engagement as enacted through service-learning
- 2.Civic engagement facilitated through virtual exchange
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Context and procedures
- Phase 1 (4 weeks)
- Phase 2 (8 weeks)
- 3.3Data collection and analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Perceptions and reflections on civic engagement
- 4.2Perceived impact of civic engagement on academic experience
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
References
References (51)
Baker, L. (2019). Community-based
service-learning in language education: A review of the literature. International Journal of
Research on Service-Learning and Community
Engagement, 7(1), Article
2.
Belz, J. A. (2005). Telecollaborative
language study: A personal overview of praxis and research. In I. Thompson & D. Hiple (Eds.), Selected
papers from the 2004 NFLRC Symposium: Distance education, distributed learning, and language
instruction. NFLRC.
Brammerts, H. (1996). Tandem
language learning via the internet and the International E-Mail Tandem
Network. In D. Little and H. Brammerts. (Eds.), A
guide to language learning in tandem via the
Internet (pp. 9–22). Centre for Language and Communication Studies.
Bringle, R., Clayton, P., & Price, M. (2009). Partnerships
in service learning and civic engagement. Partnerships: A Journal of Service Learning &
Civic
Engagement, 1(1), 1–20. [URL]
Bringle, R., & Hatcher, J. (1995). A
service-learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service
Learning, 21, 112–122. [URL]
Byram, M. (2008). From
Foreign Language Education to Education for Intercultural Citizenship: Essays and
Reflections. Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M., Golubeva, I., Han, H., & Wagner, M. (Eds.). (2017). From
principles to practice in education for intercultural citizenship. Multilingual Matters.
Deans, T. (2000). Writing
partnerships: Service-learning in composition. National Council of Teachers of English.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy
and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan Publishing.
Dooly, M., & O’Dowd, R. (2012). Researching
online foreign language interaction and exchange in foreign language education: Introduction to the
volume. In M. Dooly & R. O’Dowd (Eds.), Researching
online foreign language interaction and
exchange (pp. 11–41). Peter Lang.
European Commission. (n.d.). What is
Virtual Exchange?. EVOLVE. [URL]
Eyler, J., Giles, D. E., Jr., & Schmiede, A. (1996). A
practitioner’s guide to reflection in service-learning. Vanderbilt University.
Fair, C. D., & Delaplane, E. (2015). ‘‘It
is good to spend time with older adults. You can teach them, they can teach you:’’ Second grade students reflect on
intergenerational service learning. Early Childhood Education
Journal, 431, 19–26.
Fuchs, C. (2024). Intergenerational
service-learning through virtual exchange across a foreign language program. Journal of Virtual
Exchange, 71, 107–122,
Giralt, M., Murray, L., & Benini, S. (2022). Global
citizenship and virtual exchange practices. Promoting critical digital literacies and intercultural competence in language
education. In C. Lütge, T. Merse & P. Rauschert (Eds.), Global
citizenship in foreign language education concepts, practices,
connections (pp. 151–173). Routledge.
Golubeva, I., Wagner, M., & Yakimowski, M. (2016). Comparing
students’ perceptions of global citizenship in Hungary and the
USA. In M. Byram, I. Golubeva, H. Hui & M. Wagner (Eds.), From
principles to practice in education for intercultural
citizenship (pp. 3–24). Multilingual Matters.
Jacoby, B. (1996). Service
learning in today’s higher education. In B. Jacoby (Ed.), Service-learning
in higher education: Concepts and
practices (pp. 2–25). Jossey-Bass.
Johnson, E. (2016). Intergenerational
telecollaboration: What risks for what rewards. In S. Jager, M. Kurek & B. O’Rourke (Eds.), New
directions in telecollaborative research and practice: selected papers from the second conference on telecollaboration in
higher
education (pp. 97–103). Research-Publishing.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential
learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kramsch, C. (2022). Re-imagining
foreign language education in a Post-COVID-19 world. In C. Lütge, T. Merse & P. Rauschert (Eds.), Global
citizenship in foreign language education concepts, practices,
connections (pp. 15–40). Routledge.
Lenkaitis, C. A., & Loranc, B. (2022). The
role of intercultural virtual exchanges in global citizenship development. Journal of
International and Intercultural
Communication, 15(2), 222–234.
Lewis, T., & Qian, K. (2021). Designing
and supporting virtual exchange: The case of Chinese– English e-tandem. Modern Languages
Open, 0(1), 19.
Lütge, C., Merse, T., & Rauschert, P. (Eds.). (2022). Global
citizenship in foreign language education: Concepts, practices,
connections. Routledge.
Moreno-López, I., Ramos-Sellman, A., Miranda-Aldaco, C., & Gomis Quinto, M. T. (2017). Transforming
ways of enhancing foreign language acquisition in the Spanish classroom: Experiential learning
approaches. Foreign Language
Annals, 50(2), 398–409.
Mueller, I. (2005). Service
learning, German culture, and intercultural competence. In The year
of languages: Challenges, changes, and choices: 2005 Report of the central states conference on the teaching of foreign
languages (pp. 207–218). Eau Claire, WI: Crown Prints.
Nelson, A. L., & Scott, J. L. (2008). Applied
Spanish in the university curriculum: A successful model for community-based
service-learning. Hispania, 911, 446–460.
Newman, S., Ward, C. R., Smith, T. B., Wilson, J. O., Mc Crea, J. M., Calhoun, G., & Kingson, E. (1997). Intergenerational
programs: Past, present, and future. Taylor and Francis.
Novak, J. M., Markey, V., & Allen, M. (2007). Evaluating
cognitive outcomes of service learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Communication
Research
Reports, 24(2), 149–157.
O’Dowd, R., Sauro, S., & Spector-Cohen, E. (2020). The
role of pedagogical mentoring in virtual exchange. TESOL
Quarterly, 54(1), 146–172.
O’Dowd, R., & Ware, P. (2009). Critical
issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 22(2), 173–188.
O’Rourke, B. (2007). Models
of telecollaboration (1): E(tandem). In R. O’Dowd (Ed.), Online
intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language
teachers (pp. 41–62). Multilingual Matters.
Palpacuer Lee, C., Curtis, J. H., & Curran, M. E. (2018). Shaping
the vision for service-learning in language education. Foreign Language
Annals, 511, 169–184.
Pellettieri, J. (2011). Measuring
language-related outcomes of community-based learning in intermediate Spanish
courses. Hispania, 94(2), 285–302.
Perren, J., & Wurr, A. (Eds.). (2015). Learning
the language of global citizenship: Strengthening service-learning in TESOL. Common Ground Research Networks.
Porto, M. (2019). Affordances,
complexities, and challenges of intercultural citizenship for foreign language
teachers. Foreign Language
Annals, 521, 141–164.
(2021). Long-term
impact of four intercultural citizenship projects in the higher education foreign language
classroom. The Language Learning
Journal, 49(6), 648–667.
Rauschert, P., & Byram, M. (2018). Service
learning and intercultural citizenship in foreign-language education. Cambridge Journal of
Education, 48(3), 353–369.
Schneider, J. (2018). Teaching
in context: Integrating community-based service learning into TESOL education. TESOL
Journal, 10(1), 1–15.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics
of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd
edition). SAGE.
Underwood, H. A., & Dorfman, L. T. (2006). A
view from the other side. Journal of Intergenerational
Relationships, 4(2), 43–60.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our
world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development | department of economic and social
affairs. United Nations. [URL]
Warren, J. L. (2012). Does
service-learning increase student learning?: A meta-analysis. Michigan Journal of Community
Service-learning, 56–61.
Wells, K. (2020). Learning
Communities and Service Learning: The Effects of Combining Two High-Impact Learning Practices on First-Year, Full-Time
Community College Students Enrolled in First-Year Writing [Doctoral
dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. [URL]
Wu, C.-H. (2018). Intercultural
citizenship through participation in an international service-learning program: A case study from
Taiwan. Language Teaching
Research, 22(5), 517–531.
Wurr, A. J. (2013). Engaged
teaching and learning: Service-learning, civic literacy, and TESOL. TESOL
Journal, 41, 397–401.
(2018). Advances
in service-learning research with English language learners. Journal of Service-Learning in
Higher Education, 81, n.p.
