Cover not available

Article published In: AILA Review
Vol. 38:1 (2025) ► pp.105–128

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Does the reading platform matter?

An eye-tracking study

ORCiD logo with link | University of WarsawWarsaw | University of ViennaVienna | Université Clermont AuvergneClermont-Ferrand Cedex
ORCiD logo with link | Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
ORCiD logo with link | University of ViennaVienna | University of VeronaVerona
ORCiD logo with link | University of ViennaVienna
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Vienna.

Published online: 31 July 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24033.men
Abstract
Most reading technologies claim to provide experiences similar to reading on print paper. This study compared reading across different digital platforms and print books. Digital reading mediums used in this study were reading on a PC screen, a handheld e-reader and an iPad. A total of eighty participants enrolled in various university courses took part in this experiment. Each participant was randomly assigned to one of the reading conditions, and subsequent eye-tracking measurements were compared. Results indicated that the mean fixation duration was statistically different only for the reading from the PC condition, whereas it was similar across all other conditions. The reading time and the total number of fixations were comparable for the dedicated e-reader, iPad and printed book. This study provides empirical evidence that e-reading tools closely mimic book-reading conditions.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Methods
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Experimental condition 1
    • Experimental condition 2
    • Experimental condition 3
    • Control condition
    • Data analysis
  • Results
    • Reading time
    • Fixation measures
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Conflict of interest
  • CRediT author statement
  • Data availability statement
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (108)
References
Abanomey, A. A. (2013). Do EFL Saudi learners perform differently with online reading? An exploratory study. Journal of King Saud University-Languages and Translation, 25(1), 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in human behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ali, A. Z. M., Wahid, R., Samsudin, K., & Idris, M. Z. (2013). Reading on the Computer Screen: Does Font Type Have Effects on Web Text Readability?. International Education Studies, 6(3), 26–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Annisette, L. E., & Lafreniere, K. D. (2017). Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 1151, 154–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arsham, H. (2002). Impact of the Internet on Learning and Teaching. USDLA Journal, 16(3). Retrieved October 25, 2024 from [URL]
Aydemir, Z., Öztürk, E., & Horzum, M. B. (2013). The effect of reading from screen on the 5th grade elementary students’ level of reading comprehension on informative and narrative type of texts. Educational sciences: Theory and practice, 13(4), 2272–2276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ballatore, A., & Natale, S. (2016). E-readers and the death of the book: Or, new media and the myth of the disappearing medium. New media & society, 18(10), 2379–2394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron, N. S., Calixte, R. M., & Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 590–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benedetto, S., Drai-Zerbib, V., Pedrotti, M., Tissier, G., & Baccino, T. (2013). E-readers and visual fatigue. PloS one, 8(12), e83676. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beymer, D., & Russell, D. M. (2005, April). WebGazeAnalyzer: a system for capturing and analysing web reading behavior using eye gaze. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1913–1916). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biedert, R., Buscher, G., & Dengel, A. (2009). The eye book — Using Eye Tracking to Enhance the Reading Experience. Informatik-Spektrum, 33(3), 272–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burstyn, J., & Herriotts, M. A. (2010). gBook: an e-book reader with physical document navigation techniques. In CHI’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4369–4374). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1981). Cognitive processes in reading: Models based on readers’ eye fixations. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 177–213). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrière, J. C., & Eco, U. (2011). This is not the end of the book: A conversation curated by Jean-Philippe de Tonnac. Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castellano, J. A. (1992). Handbook of display technology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, D. W., & Catrambone, R. (2015). Paper vs. screen: Effects on reading comprehension, metacognition, and reader behavior. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 332–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of research in reading, 42(2), 288–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conlon, E., & Sanders, M. (2011). The reading rate and comprehension of adults with impaired reading skills or visual discomfort. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(2), 193–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connell, C., Bayliss, L., & Farmer, W. (2012). Effects of eBook readers and tablet computers on reading comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(2), 131–140. [URL]
Cuiñas, A. A. F., & Augusto, V. P. (2022). The Smell of Printed Books: A Qualitative Comparison between Printed and Digital Formats. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(1), 214–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & education, 621, 18–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, D. S., & Neitzel, C. (2012). Collaborative sense-making in print and digital text environments. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 831–856. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2002). Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: an experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 145–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational research review, 251, 23–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeSilver, D. (2014). Overall Book Readership Stable, But E-Books Becoming More Popular; Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: [URL]. Accessed on 21 May 2024.
Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297–1326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dillon, A., McKnight, C., & Richardson, J. (1988). Reading from paper versus reading from screen. The computer journal, 31(5), 457–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dillon, T. W., & Emurian, H. H. (1995). Reports of visual fatigue resulting from use of a video display unit. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(1), 77–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobler, E. (2015). E-textbooks: A personalised learning experience or a digital distraction? Journal of adolescent & adult literacy, 58(6), 482–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Driscoll, B., & Squires, C. (2018). ‘Oh look, a Ferry’; or the smell of paper books. TXT, (51), 64–70. [URL]
Dyson, M. C. (2004). How physical text layout affects reading from screen. Behaviour & information technology, 23(6), 377–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebrahimi, S. S. (2016). Effect of digital reading on comprehension of English prose texts in EFL/ESL contexts. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 5(2), 111–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eden, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2013). The effect of format on performance: Editing text in print versus digital formats. British journal of educational technology, 44(5), 846–856. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The Psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallant, D. T., Seniuk, A. G., & Vertegaal, R. (2008). Towards more paper-like input: flexible input devices for foldable interaction styles. Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 283–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garland, K. J., & Noyes, J. M. (2004). CRT monitors: Do they interfere with learning?. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(1), 43–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gomez, J. (2008). Will books disappear? In J. Gomez, Print is Dead (pp. 175–193). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, S., Dungworth, N., McKnight, C., & Morris, A. (2007). Electronic books: Children’s reading and comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 583–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guimbretière, F. (2003, November). Paper augmented digital documents. Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 51–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 417–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hillesund, T. (2010). Digital reading spaces: How expert readers handle books, the Web and electronic paper. First Monday, 15(4). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye Tracking: a Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press USA — OSO.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In R. M. Willems (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use (pp. 135–159). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeong, Y. J., & Gweon, G. (2021). Advantages of print reading over screen reading: A comparison of visual patterns, reading performance, and reading attitudes across paper, computers, and tablets. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(17), 1674–1684. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological review, 87(4), 329–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, Y. Y., Wang, M. J. J., & Lin, R. (2009). Usability evaluation of e-books. Displays, 30(2), 49–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerr, M. A., & Symons, S. E. (2006). Computerised presentation of text: Effects on children’s reading of informational material. Reading and writing, 19(1), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köpper, M., Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2016). Reading from computer screen versus reading from paper: does it still make a difference?. Ergonomics, 59(5), 615–632. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2007). Electronic books versus adult readers: Effects on children’s emergent literacy as a function of social class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 248–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PloS one, 8(2), e56178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Douglas, S., & Kuiken, D. (2020). Capturing the ways we read: Introducing the reading habits questionnaire. Anglistik, 31(1), 53–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurata, K., Ishita, E., Miyata, Y., & Minami, Y. (2016). Print or digital? Reading behavior and preferences in Japan. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 884–894. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labrecque, L. I., vor dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T. P., & Hofacker, C. F. (2013). Consumer power: Evolution in the digital age. Journal of interactive marketing, 27(4), 257–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lahey, B., Girouard, A., Burleson, W., & Vertegaal, R. (2011). PaperPhone: understanding the use of bend gestures in mobile devices with flexible electronic paper displays. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1303–1312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lauer, G. (2020). Lesen im digitalen Zeitalter. Wbg Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lauterman, T., & Ackerman, R. (2014). Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration. Computers in Human Behavior, 351, 455–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, D. S., Ko, Y. H., Shen, I. H., & Chao, C. Y. (2011). Effect of light source, ambient illumination, character size and interline spacing on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays. Displays, 32(1), 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2013). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). International Reading Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, P., Sepanski, S., & Zhao, X. (2006). Language history questionnaire: A web-based interface for bilingual research. Behavior research methods, 38(2), 202–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liao, C., Guimbretière, F., Hinckley, K., & Hollan, J. (2008). Papiercraft: A gesture-based command system for interactive paper. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 14(4), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liao, S., Yu, L., Kruger, J. L., Reichle, E. D. (2024). Dynamic reading in a digital age: new insights on cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(1), 43–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, H., Wu, F. G., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2013). Legibility and visual fatigue affected by text direction, screen size and character size on color LCD e-reader. Displays, 34(1), 49–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of documentation, 61(6), 700–712. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J.-F., Epstein, I., & Fayard, P. (2003). Effects of online reading on popular science comprehension. Science Communication, 25(2), 99–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D. (2014). Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific study of literature, 4(2), 150–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International journal of educational research, 581, 61–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margolin, S. J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M. J., & Kegler, J. L. (2013). E-readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms?. Applied cognitive psychology, 27(4), 512–519. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, L., Pluchino, P., Tornatora, M. C., & Ariasi, N. (2013). An eye-tracking study of learning from science text with concrete and abstract illustrations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 356–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLaughlin, M. (2012), Reading Comprehension: What Every Teacher Needs to Know. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 432–440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendieta, E. (2021). Embracing a culture of lifelong learning: from the paperback to the ebook: lifelong learning in the age of the internet (Document No. UIL/2021/PI/H/6). [URL]
Menz, C., & Groner, R. (1984). The acquisition of a new letter system: effects of word length and redundancy. Advances in Psychology, 221, 213–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milliot, J. (2014). E-books remain third: print formats outsell digital in the first half of 2014. Publishers Weekly, 261(39), 6–7. [URL]
Miranda, A. M., Nunes-Pereira, E. J., Baskaran, K., & Macedo, A. F. (2018). Eye movements, convergence distance and pupil-size when reading from smartphone, computer, print and tablet. Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science, 111(1), 1–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moody, A. K., Justice, L. M., & Cabell, S. Q. (2010). Electronic versus traditional storybooks: Relative influence on preschool children’s engagement and communication. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 294–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and performance, 10(5), 667–682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, M. C., & Pérez, J. (2011). E-textbooks are coming: Are we ready. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 8(6), 49–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. (2010). iPad and Kindle reading speeds. Retrieved from [URL]. Accessed 21 May 2024
Oborne, D. J., & Holton, D. (1988). Reading from screen versus paper: there is no difference. International journal of man-machine studies, 28(1), 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Toole, K. J., & Kannass, K. N. (2018). Emergent literacy in print and electronic contexts: The influence of book type, narration source, and attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1731, 100–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paczkowski, J. (2013). Apple’s iTunes U Hits One Billion Downloads. Retrieved from: [URL]. Accessed 21 May 2024.
Perrin, A. (2022, January 6). Three-in-ten Americans now read e-books. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: [URL]
Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1990). Eye movements and lexical access in reading. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 143–163). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prensky, M. (2013). Our brains extended. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 22–27. [URL]
Rainie, L., & Duggan, M. (2012). E-book reading jumps; print book reading declines. Pew Internet & American Life Project, December, 271. Retrieved from: [URL]
Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2005). Dynamic text comprehension: An integrative view of reading. Current directions in psychological science, 14(5), 276–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological bulletin, 85(3), 618–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific studies of reading, 10(3), 241–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, K., & Reichle, E. D. (2010). Models of the reading process. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 787–799. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reingold, E. M., & Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identification stages hypothesised by the E-Z Reader model. Psychological Science, 17(9), 742–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenfield, M. (2011). Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 31(5), 502–515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwabe, A., Brandl, L., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Stocker, G. (2021). Experiencing literature on the e-reader: the effects of reading narrative texts on screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(2), 319–338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sellen, A. J., & Harper, R. (2003). The myth of the paperless office (1st paperback ed). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, E., Bochud, Y., Bergamin, P., & Wurtz, P. (2012). Reading on LCD vs e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 32(5), 367–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., Bergamin, P., & Groner, R. (2011). Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays, 32(5), 268–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., & Groner, R. (2010). Improving the usability of e-book readers. Journal of usability studies, 6(1), 25–38. [URL]
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of educational research, 87(6), 1007–1041. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singer, L. M., Alexander, P. A., & Berkowitz, L. E. (2019). Effects of processing time on comprehension and calibration in print and digital mediums. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(1), 101–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spence, C. (2020). The Multisensory Experience of Handling and Reading Books. Multisensory Research, 33(8), 902–928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanner, M. J. (2014). Digital vs. print: Reading comprehension and the future of the book. School of Information Student Research Journal, 4(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., & King, D. W. (2012). Article and book reading patterns of scholars: Findings for publishers. Learned publishing, 25(4), 279–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyner, K. (2014). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, G. (2016). Screen and paper reading research — a literature review. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 47(3), 160–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analysing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of research in education, 34(1), 179–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, J.-I., Mochizuki, A., & Horry, Y. (2008). Bookisheet: bendable device for browsing content using the metaphor of leafing through the pages. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, 360–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waycott, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2003). Students’ experiences with PDAs for reading course materials. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 71, 30–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zambarbieri, D., & Carniglia, E. (2012). Eye movement analysis of reading from computer displays, eReaders and printed books. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 32(5), 390–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue