Article published In: AILA Review: Online-First Articles
Chinese Russian language teachers’ agency in response to the New Liberal Arts policy
An ecological perspective
Published online: 13 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23019.cai
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23019.cai
Abstract
The Declaration on the Construction of New liberal Arts released in 2020 put forward
curriculum-based ideological and moral education, quality culture, interdisciplinary integration and mode innovation as principles
for new liberal arts construction, which are later adopted as language policy support underlying Chinese Russian language
teachers’ (RLTs) career development. Against this backdrop, we focused on the issue of Russian language teachers’ agency in
response to the call under the guidance of the ecological theory. We applied the ecological lens to researching how RLTs interact
with diverse contextual factors at different subsystems to seek their professional development. The current study explored RLTs’
agency exercise experiences through semi-structured interviews with three RLTs working in Chinese universities. The findings
showed that Chinese RLTs generally held a positive attitude towards the new education policy, while their potential for mobilizing
was directly associated with the contingent policy of their local institutions. What’s more, their career prospects rested upon
their career planning and personality. The study provides useful insights into teacher agency for less-commonly-taught languages
and the different subsystems constraining their agencies. Given the relatively small sample size involved in the study and the
strong dependence on interview-based data, further study based on larger sample size and multidimensional data with adequate
cross-validation is expected.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Teacher agency and the ecological theory
- 2.1Teacher agency under policy changes
- 2.2The ecological theory of foreign language teachers
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Setting
- 3.2Participants
- 3.3Data collection and analysis
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Macrosystem
- Teacher A
- Teacher B
- Teacher C
- 4.2Exosystem
- 4.3Mesosystem
- 4.3.1The impact of institutional polices
- 4.3.2The impact of interpersonal relationship
- 4.4Microsystem
- 4.1Macrosystem
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
- Enclosure statement
- Notes
References
References (45)
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency
and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of
Adults, 39(2), 132–149.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The
Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(1993). The
Ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive
findings. In R. H. Wozniak, & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development
in Context: Acting and Thinking in Specific
Environments (pp.3–44). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chen, X. M. (2000). Qualitative
Research Methods and Social Science
Research. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.
(2003). Learning
to do qualitative research in
action. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.
Chimbutane, F. (2011). Rethinking
Bilingual Education in Postcolonial Contexts. In N. H. Hornberger, & C. Baker (Eds.), Multilingual
Matters (pp.183–188). Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto.
Chu, W. X., Liu, H. G., & Fang, F. (2021). A
Tale of Three Excellent Chinese EFL Teachers: Unpacking Teacher Professional Qualities for Their Sustainable Career
Trajectories from an Ecological
Perspective. Sustainability. 131, 6721.
Chung, J., & Choi, T. H. (2016). English
education policies in South Korea: Planned and enacted. In A. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), English
education policy in
Asia (pp.281–299). Springer.
Cincotta-Segi, A. R. (2011). The
big ones swallow the small ones. Or do they? Language-in-education policy and ethnic minority education in the Lao
PDR. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural
Development. 11, 1–15.
Duff, P. A. (2012). Identity,
Agency, and Second Language Acquisition. In S. M. Gass, & A. Mackey (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Second Language
Acquisition (pp.410–426). London: Routledge.
Ebersöhn, L., Loots, T., Eloff, I., & Ferreira, R. (2015). Taking
note of obstacles research partners negotiate in long-term higher education community engagement
partnerships. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 451, 59–72.
Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016). Language
teacher-researcher identity negotiation: An ecological perspective. TESOL
Quarterly. 31, 735–745.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2014). Identity
and agency in professional learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International
handbook of research in professional and practice-based
learning (pp.645–672).
Gao, X. S., Tao, J., & Gong, Y. (2018). Sociocultural
Inquiry on Teacher Agency and Professional Identity in Curriculum Reforms. Foreign Languages
and Their Teaching. 11, 19–28+146
Guo, Y. J. (2020). On
the Construction of Foreign Language Education in the New Era: Thoughts and
Reflections. Foreign Languages in
China. 11, 4–12.
Freeman, R. D. (1998). Bilingual
education and social change. Bilingual Education. Multilingual Matters.
Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational
change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational
change. Teaching and Teacher
Education. 81, 967–983.
Hofstadler, N., Babic, S., Lämmerer, A., Mercer, S., & Oberdorfer, P. (2021). The
ecology of CLIL teachers in Austria – an ecological perspective on CLIL teachers’
wellbeing. Innovation in Language Learning and
Teaching. 31, 218–232.
Hu, G. (2005). Contextual
influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL
Quarterly. 41, 635–660.
Lasky, S. (2005). A
sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary
school reform. Teaching and Teacher
Education. 211, 899–916.
Liddicoat, A. J. (2018). Constraints
on Agency in Micro Language Policy and Planning in Schools. In J. Bouchard, & G. P. Glasgow (Eds.), Agency
in Language Policy and Planning – Critical
Inquiries (pp.149–170). New York: Routledge.
Liu, H. G., Yan, C. M., & Fu, J. Y. (2022). Exploring
livestream English teaching anxiety in the Chinese context: An ecological perspective. Teaching
and Teacher Education. 41, 103620.
Maclellan, E. (2017). Shaping
agency through theorising and practising teaching in teacher
education. In Clandinin, D., & Husu, J. (Eds.), The
Sage Handbook of Research in Teacher
Education (pp.253–268). London: Sage.
Mansfield, C. F., Ebersöhn, L., Beltman, S., & Loots, T. (2018). Great
Southern Lands: Making Space for Teacher Resilience in South Africa and
Australia. In M. Wosnitza, F. Peixoto, S. Beltman, & C. F. Mansfield (Eds.), Resilience
in Education: Concepts, Context and
Connections. (pp.53–71). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Mercer, S. (2020). The
wellbeing of language teachers in the private sector: An ecological perspective. Language
Teaching Research, 1–24. Advanced online publication.
Ning, Q. (2020). Social
Demand and Core Tasks in Construction of New Liberal Arts. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong
University (Philosophy and Social
Sciences). 41, 13–17.
Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2016). Teacher’s
professional agency – A relational approach to teacher learning. Learning, Research and
Practice. 21, 112–129.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher
agency: An ecological approach. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher
agency in curriculum making: agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre, Curriculuma
Inquiry, 21, 191–214.
Priestley, M., & Minty, S. (2013). Curriculum
for excellence: ‘A brilliant idea, but….’. Scottish Educational
Review. 11, 39–52.
Ramanathan, V. (2005). Rethinking
language planning and policy from the ground up: Refashioning institutional realities and human
lives. Current Issues in Language
Planning. 21, 89–101.
Ruan, X., & Zheng, X. (2019). The
rhetoric and the reality: Exploring the dynamics of professional agency in the identity commitment of a Chinese female
teacher. Learning, Culture and Social
Interaction. 211, 348–361.
Shohamy, E. (2010). Case
of language policy resistance in Israel’s centralized educational
system. In K. Menken, & O. Garcia (Eds.), Negotiating
Language Policies in
School (pp.182–197). New York: Routledge.
Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2003). Legal
discourse and decisions, teacher policymaking and the multilingual classroom: Constraining and supporting Khmer/English
biliteracy in the United States. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 61, 168–184.
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher
agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching & Teacher
Education. 631, 346–355.
Tao, Y. (2021). Russian
language teachers’ professional agency against the backdrop of the New National Teaching Quality Standards in China: an
ecological perspective. Current Issues in Language
Planning, 41, 347–370.
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., acker, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher
communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and
Teacher Education. 611, 47–59.
Wang, C. J. (2021). What
Does New Liberal Arts Mean to Foreign Language Education? Foreign Languages in
China. 11, 1+24.
Wang, L. (2022). English
Language Teacher Agency in Response to Curriculum Reform in China: An Ecological
Approach. Frontiers in
Psychology. 131, 935038.