Cover not available

Article published In:
[AILA Review 36:1] 2023
► pp. 91–111

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Developing L2 listening comprehension through extensive and intensive listening

ORCiD logo with link | Toyo University
 | Japan Women’s College of Physical Education
Published online: 24 July 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.22015.kar
Abstract
In the fall semester of 2020, 269 Japanese university students were compared in a quasi-experimental study to determine whether extensive and intensive listening interventions yielded significant gains in L2 listening comprehension. At the beginning of the study, 269 students took a 100-item L2 listening exam, and were randomly placed into an extensive (n = 135) or intensive listening group (n = 134). After each group completed five assignments based on extensive or intensive listening principles, students took another 100-item L2 listening exam. Paired-sample t-tests of raw scores and Rasch person ability estimates indicated that the extensive listening group significantly improved in raw scores, t(134) = −7.44, p = .00, but not in Rasch person ability estimates t(134) = −1.86, p = .07, while the intensive listening group significantly improved in both raw scores, t(133) = −9.48, p = .00, and Rasch person ability estimates, t(133) = −3.58, p = .00.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
    • L2 listening pedagogy in Japan
    • A framework for EL and IL
    • Top-down and bottom-up listening instruction
    • EL and IL research
    • Research questions
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Procedure
  • Instruments and study materials
    • Tests
    • Audiobooks
  • Data analysis
  • Results
    • L2 listening comprehension scores
    • Levene’s test of equality of variances
    • Paired-sample t-tests
  • Discussion
  • Limitations
    • Balancing interventions
    • Cross-over design
    • Longer timeline
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (74)
References
Asquith, S. (2014). Integrating a functional approach with Japanese junior high school teaching practices. In P. Clements, A. Krause, & H. Brown (Eds.), JALT2014: Conversations across borders (pp. 48–57). JALT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, A., & Lyon, P. (2017). How to support students in selecting graded readers. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 8(3), 247–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bibby, S. (2020). Listening in the language classroom: The case for extensive listening. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin, 23(1), 1–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blyth, A. (2011). How teachers teach listening in Japan: Part 1. KOTESL Proceedings 2010, 15(1), 71–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, S. (2011). Listening myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck, G. (1988). Testing listening comprehension in Japanese university entrance examinations. JALT Journal, 10(1), 15–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, A. (2010). Second-language listening anxiety before and after a 1-yr intervention in extensive listening compared with standard foreign language instruction. Perceptual and Motor Skill, 110(2), 355–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Gains to L2 learners from extensive listening: Listening development, vocabulary acquisition and perceptions of the intervention. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 35–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, A., & Millett, S. (2016). Developing L2 listening fluency through extended listening-focused activities in an extensive-listening programme. RELC Journal, 47(3), 349–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, A., Millett, S., & Renandya, W. (2018). Developing listening fluency through supported extensive listening practice. RELC Journal. 50(3), 422–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cid, J., Wei, Y., Kim, S., & Hauck, C. (2017). Statistical analyses for the updated TOEIC listening and reading test. ETS Research Memorandum ETS RM-17-05. ETS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2015). The effectiveness of using dictation to develop listening comprehension. Kinki University Center for Liberal Arts and Foreign Language Education Journal, 6(2), 43–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 151–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Listening strategy instruction (or extensive listening?): A response to Renandya (2012). Teaching English and Communication in Higher Education. NUS. Retrieved on 4 April 2023 from [URL]
Cross, J., & Vandergrift, L. (2018). Metacognitive listening strategies. In J. I. Liontas, T. International Association, & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daily, A. (2010). Difficulties implementing CLT in South Korea: Mismatch between the language policy and what is taking place in the classroom. University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Day, R., & Bamford, J. (2002). Top ten principles in teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 141, 136–141. 10125/66761Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducker, N. D., & Saunders, J. M. (2014). Extensive listening: Using authentic materials. In N. Sonda, & A. Krause (Eds.), JALT2013 Conference Proceedings (pp. 383–394). JALT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll). Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, J. (2003). Promoting perception: Lexical segmentation in L2 listening. ELT Journal, 57(4), 325–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). An insight into listeners’ problems: Too much bottom-up or too much top-down? System, 32(3), 363–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2010). Listening in a second language. In A. D. Wolvin (Ed.), Listening and human communication in the 21st Century (pp. 158–177). Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilman, R. A., & Moody, L. M. (1984). What practitioners say about listening: Research implications for the classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 17(4), 331–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goh, C. (2010). Listening as process: Learning activities for self-appraisal and self regulation. In N. Harwood (Ed.), Materials in ELT: Theory and practice (pp. 179–206). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learner’s perspective. System, 341, 165–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoa, L. B. (2020). Listening portfolio: A combination of extensive and intensive listening. The Center for ELF Journal, 6(1), 95–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holden, W. (2008). Extensive listening: A new approach to an old problem. Journal of the faculty of Humanities, Toyama University, 49(1), 299–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeon, E-Y., & Day, R. (2016). The effectiveness of ER on reading proficiency: A meta-analysis. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 246–265.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karimi, M., & Nazari, M. (2017). The congruity/incongruity of EFL teachers’ beliefs about listening instruction and their listening instructional practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 62–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karlin, O., & Karlin, S. (2019). L2 listening homework: Intensive vs. extensive. Korea TESOL Journal, 14(2), 97–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Comparing the effectiveness of L2 extensive and intensive listening Approaches. English as a Foreign Language International Journal, 25(4), 26–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiany, G. R., & Shiramiry, E. (2002). The effect of frequent dictation on the listening comprehension ability of elementary EFL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 20(1), 57–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuo, Y. (2010). Using partial dictation of an English teaching radio program to enhance EFL learners’ listening comprehension. Asian EFL Journal: Professional Teaching Articles, 471, 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lake, J., & Holster, T. (2014). Developing autonomous self-regulated readers in an extensive reading program. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 5(4), 394–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, S. C. (2010). Developing intensive listening skills: A case study of the long-term dictation tasks using rapid speech. The English Teacher, 39(1), 94–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, J. R., & O’Donnell, A. M. (1999). What to do about educational research’s credibility gaps? Issues in Education, 5(2), 177–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linacre, J. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), 103–122. Retrieved on 4 April 2023 from [URL]
Long, D. R. (1990). What you don’t know can’t help you. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(1), 65–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marzban, A., & Abdollahi, M. (2013). The effect of partial dictation on the listening comprehension ability of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 5(2), 238–244.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayora, C. A. (2017). Extensive listening in a Colombian university: Process, product, and perceptions. HOW, 24(1), 101–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Approaches to teaching listening in the language classroom. Proceedings of the 1997 Korea TESOL Conference. Taejon, Korea. KOTESOL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelletier, L. G., Séguin-Lévesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 186–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T. (2000). Tradition and transition in English language teaching methodology. System, 28(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 879–912. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Povey, E. (2016). Extensive listening: Pedagogy, resources, and tools. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(7), 35–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Powers, D. E., Kim, H., & Weng, V. Z. (2008). The redesigned TOEIC (listening and reading) test: Relations to test-taker perceptions of proficiency in English. ETS Research Report Series, 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasch, G. (1960). Probalistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ratkowsky, D. A., Evans, M. A., & Allredge, J. R. (1992). Cross-over experiments: Design, analysis, and application. Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renandya, W. (2012). Five reasons why listening strategy instruction might not work with lower proficiency learners. ELTWorldOnline.com. Retrieved on 4 April 2023 from [URL]
Richards, J. C. (2005). Second thoughts on teaching listening. RELC Journal, 36(1), 85–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rost, M. (2016). Teaching and Researching Listening (3rd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, Y. (2019). Impacts of introducing four-skill English tests into university entrance examinations. The Language Teacher, 43(2), 9–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. S., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct instruction, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: effects on learning disabled students’ composition skills and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 340–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. (2016). Listening journals for extensive and intensive listening practice. English Teaching Forum, 54(2), 2–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shimauchi, S. (2018). English-medium instruction in the internationalization of higher education in Japan: Rationale and issues. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 12(1), 77–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegal, J. (2011). Thoughts on L2 listening pedagogy. ELT Journal, 65(3), 318–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Exploring L2 listening instruction: Examinations of practice. ELT Journal, 68(1), 22–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegal, J., & Siegal, A. (2015). Getting to the bottom of L2 listening instruction: Making a case for bottom-up activities. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 637–662. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2005). The communicative approach in Japanese secondary schools: Teachers’ perceptions and practice. The Language Teacher, 29(3), 3–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanewong, S. (2019). Metacognitive pedagogical sequence for less-proficient Thai EFL listeners: A comparative investigation. RELC Journal, 50(1), 86–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Extensive Reading Foundation. (2011). The Extensive Reading Foundation’s guide to extensive reading. Retrieved on 4 April 2023 from [URL]
Thorn, S. (2009). Mining listening texts. Modern English Teacher, 18(2), 5–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsui, A., & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 432–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). A Theory of Notetaking Derived from Student’s Perceptions of Notetaking. Manuscript under publication review, University at Albany, State University of New York, Department of Educational Psychology and Statistics, Albany, NY.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2012). Teaching listening. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–8). Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weaver, C., Jones, A., & Bulach, J. (2008). Comparing placement decisions based on raw test scores and Rasch ability scores. The Language Teacher, 32(6), 3–8.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[URL]. (n.d.). Reliability and separation of measures. Retrieved on 4 April 2023 from [URL]
Yeldham, M. (2016). Second language listening instruction: Comparing a strategies-based approach with an interactive strategies/bottom-up skills approach. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 394–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yonezaki, H. (2014). Effectiveness of dictation in improving English listening ability of Japanese high school students. Research Reports of Nagaoka College of Technology, 501, 21–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Chou, Mu-Hsuan & Wei-Chi Pan
2025. Exploring English proficiency, listening strategies, and self-efficacy in a workplace English course: a moderated serial mediation approach. Language Awareness ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue