English monolingualism in scientific communication and progress in science, good or bad?

Coulmas, Florian

doi:10.1075/aila.20.03cou

Article published In: Linguistic inequality in scientific communication today: What can future applied linguistics do to mitigate disadvantages for non-anglophones?
Edited by Augusto Carli and Ulrich Ammon
[AILA Review 20] 2007
► pp. 5–13

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

English monolingualism in scientific communication and progress in science, good or bad?

Florian Coulmas | Deutsches Institut für Japanstudien

Published online: 7 March 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20.03cou

Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Order by:

Archila, Pablo Antonio & Anne-Marie Truscott de Mejía

2020. Bilingual university science courses: a questionnaire on professors’ practices and espoused beliefs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23:2 ► pp. 132 ff.

Haller, Max

2019. A Global Scientific Community? Universalism Versus National Parochialism in Patterns of International Communication in Sociology*. International Journal of Sociology 49:5-6 ► pp. 342 ff.

Mueller, Jessica

2019. Rabe, Frank: Englischsprachiges Schreiben und Publizieren in verschiedenen Fachkulturen: Wie deutschsprachige Forscher mit der Anglisierung der Wissenschaftskommunikation umgehen . Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 8:1 ► pp. 167 ff.

Huang, Ju Chuan

2011. Attitudes of Taiwanese scholars toward English and Chinese as languages of publication. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 31:2 ► pp. 115 ff.

Clyne, Michael & Farzad Sharifian

2008. English as an international language. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 31:3 ► pp. 28.1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.