Article published In: Linguistic Recycling: The process of quoting in increasingly mediatized settings
Edited by Lauri Haapanen and Daniel Perrin
[AILA Review 33] 2020
► pp. 86–103
Linguistic recycling in language acquisition
Child-directed speech and child speech in the study of language acquisition
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 7 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00031.laa
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00031.laa
Abstract
The paper examines how children quote their parents’ utterances. In other words, it investigates linguistic
recycling as an aspect of language learning and how the child-directed speech (CDS) of adults influences child speech (CS). This
topic is examined especially in the light of research made in the crosslinguistic project on pre- and protomorphology in language
acquisition. Premorphology is characterized by rote-learned forms, which the child has memorized and stored as
chunks from CDS (e.g., Finn vettä, Est vett ‘water,’ partitive form). During
protomorphology, the child imitates CDS and produces analogical forms (e.g. Finn CDS: söi
vs. CS: syöi ‘ate’, Est CDS: ütles vs. CS: ükki ‘said’), which then gradually
evolve into adult-like grammar. Usage-based approaches to language acquisition rely on the assumption that language structures are
learned from language use. Typical material in present-day child language research is based on tape recordings and transcripts
made from these recordings. This kind of data makes it possible to take into account the influence of CDS to CS in a more accurate
way than the earlier data collecting methods, such as diary material, which usually contains mostly utterances produced by the
child do. The article examines how CDS gives models to CS and how the acquisition proceeds from early rote-learned forms to
adult-like grammar from the perspective of frequency distributions of inflectional patterns and elaboration on linguistic forms in
CDS – CS interaction. On the basis of analyzed speech samples and previous results, it is obvious that the quoting in children’s
and adults’ speech is present on different levels of language and is often bidirectional in nature.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Frequency distributions of inflectional forms
- 3.Diminutives: Simplification of linguistic forms in CDS – CS interaction
- 3.1Diminutives in Finnish
- 3.2Diminutives in Estonian
- 4.Elaboration of linguistic forms in CDS – CS interaction
- 4.1Quoting in CDS – CS interaction
- 4.2CDS – CS interaction schemes in the acquisition of adjectives
- 5.The early grammar of the child and CDS
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (14)
Argus, R. (2009). The early development of case and number in Estonian. In Stephany, U. & Voeykova, M. D. (Eds.), Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective, (pp. 111–151). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Argus, R., & Kõrgesaar, H. (2014). Sõnaliigid eesti lapse kõnes ja lapsele suunatud kõnes. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat. Estonian Papers of Applied Linguistics, 101, 37–53.
Dressler, W. U., Ketrez, F. N., Kilani-Schoch, M., & Stephany, U. (2017). Introduction. In W. U. Dressler, F. N. Ketrez, & M. Kilani-Schoch (Eds.), Nominal compound acquisition (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laalo, K. (2007). Diminutives in Finnish child-directed and child speech. In I. Savickiene & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), The acquisition of diminutives: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 263–278). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2009). Acquisition of case and plural in Finnish. In U. Stephany & M. D. Voeykova (Eds.), Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 49–89). Berlin: De Gruyter.
(2011). Lapsen varhaiskielioppi ja miniparadigmat [Protogrammar and miniparadigms in child language]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura [The Finnish Literature Society].
(2015). Adjectives in Finnish child language: Morphological and semantic aspects. In E. Tribushinina, M. D. Voeikova, & S. Noccetti (Eds.), Semantics and morphology of early adjectives in first language acquisition (pp. 395–434). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Laalo, K., & Kunnari, S. (2012). Hoivakieli. In S. Kunnari & T. Savinainen-Makkonen (Eds.), Pienten sanat: Lasten äänteellinen kehitys (pp. 106–118). Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Lieven, E. (2016). Usage-based approaches to language development: Where do we go from here? Language and Cognition, 8(3), 346–368.
Pajusalu, K. (2001). Baby talk as a sophisticated register: A phonological analysis of South Estonian. Psychology of Language and Communication, 5(2), 81–92.
Savickiene, I., & Dressler, W. U. (Eds.). (2007). The acquisition of diminutives: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stephany, U., & Voeykova, M. D. (Eds.). (2009). Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Kirjavainen, Minna & Maija Surakka
2025. The acquisition of Finnish morphology and syntax. In First Language Acquisition in Finno-Ugric Languages [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 33], ► pp. 156 ff.
Fusaroli, Riccardo, Ethan Weed, Roberta Rocca, Deborah Fein & Letitia Naigles
Odijk, Lotte & Steven Gillis
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
