Article published In: Policy and practice in early language learning:
Edited by Janet Enever and Patricia Driscoll
[AILA Review 32] 2019
► pp. 36–63
CLASSROOM PEDAGOGY
The hidden curriculum of work in English language education
Neoliberalism and early English programs in public schooling
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 7 April 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00020.say
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00020.say
Abstract
There has been a rapid global expansion of English instruction in the early grades in public school curricula.
Particularly in so-called developing countries, the increase of and its shift from exclusively private to public education is
linked to the idea that acquiring English promotes personal, social, and economic development. The author takes one case of a
recent early English program, the national program in Mexico, and argues that it is a representative case of a language education
programme and policy organized around neoliberal principles. The policy’s stated goal is to address issues of access and equity
for public school students; however, findings indicate that the actual processes of teaching and learning at the classroom level
remain highly stratified across social class lines. An analysis of English lessons in schools at different points on the
socioeconomic spectrum illustrates that instruction is preparing children with certain types of skills and dispositions congruent
to their class position and revealing the hidden curriculum of work in early English education.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Methodology: An impact study of the early English programme in Mexican public schools
- How social class shapes English classrooms in Mexico: Three schools compared
- The working-class school
- The teachers and students
- The lesson
- The middle-class school
- The teachers and students
- The lesson
- The affluent school
- The teachers and students
- The lesson
- Outliers, teacher rotation, and teachers’ social class
- The hidden curriculum of work, human capital theory, and neoliberalism
- The myth of opportunity: Human capital theory and early English programmes as neoliberal education policy
- Implications and conclusions: Educating language teachers as critical practitioners
- Notes
References
References (42)
Au, W., & Apple, M. (2009). Rethinking reproduction: Neo-Marxism in critical education theory. In M. Apple, W. Au, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 83–95). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Rethinking case study research: A comparative approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
Becker, G. S. (1994). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Billings, S. (2014). Language, globalization and the making of a Tanzanian beauty queen. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Education reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Bruthiaux, P. (2002). Hold your courses: Language education, language choice, and economic development. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 275–296.
Clayton, T. (2006). Language choice in a nation under transition: English language spread in Cambodia. New York, NY: Springer.
de Mejía, A.-M. (2009). Teaching English to young learners in Colombia: Policy, practice and challenges. Mextesol Journal, 33(1), 103–114.
(2002). Power, prestige, and bilingualism: International perspectives on elite bilingual education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Enever, J. (2012). Current policy issues in early foreign language learning. CEPS Journal, 2(3), 9–26.
Erling, E. J., & Seargeant, P. (Eds.). (2013). English and development: Policy, pedagogy and globalization. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Flores, N. (2013). The unexamined relationship between neoliberalism and plurilingualism: A cautionary tale. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 500–520.
Forbes. (2014). ¿A cuál clase social pertences? [What social class do you belong to?]. Forbes México. May 17, 2014. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (28 September, 2018).
Hamid, M. O. (2010). Globalisation, English for everyone and English teacher capacity: Language policy discourses and realities in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(4), 289–310.
Hopkins, D., Ahtaridou, E., Matthews, P., & Posner, C. (2007). An analysis of the Mexican school system in light of PISA 2006. London: London Centre for Leadership in Learning, University of London.
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [National Census Bureau of Mexico]). (2016). Encuesta Nacional de Ingresos y Gastos de los Hogares 2016. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (30 April, 2018).
Jones, S., & Vagle, M. D. (2013). Living contradictions and working for change: Toward a theory of social class-sensitive pedagogy. Educational Researcher, 42(3), 129–141.
Kuchah, K. (2018). Early English medium instruction in Francophone Cameroon: The injustice of equal opportunity. System, 73(2), 37–47.
López-Gopar, M. (2016). Decolonizing primary English language teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
López-Gopar, M., & Sughrua, W. (2014). Social class and English language education in Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 13(2), 104–110.
Matear, A. (2008). English language learning and education policy in Chile: Can English really open doors for all? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(2), 131–147.
McGroarty, M. (1996). Language attitudes, motivation, and standards. In S. L. McKay & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 3–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nguyen, H. T. M. (2011). Primary English language education policy in Vietnam: Insights from implementation. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 225–249.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2018). Agenda: 1st Joint IMF-OECD-World Bank Conference on Structural Reforms. Conference Program. Paris, France: June, 2018. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (28 September, 2018).
Park, J. S., & Wee, L. (2012). Markets of English: Linguistic capital and language policy in a globalizing world. New York, NY: Routledge.
Pennycook, A. (2007). The myth of English as an international language. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 90–115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Ramírez Romero, J. L., Sayer, P., & Pamplón Irigoyen, E. N. (2014). English language teaching in public primary schools in Mexico: The practices and challenges of implementing a national language education program. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(8), 1020–1043.
Reyes Cruz, M., Murrieta Loyo, G., & Hernández Méndez, E. (2011). Políticas lingüísticas nacionales e internacionales sobre la enseñanza del inglés en escuelas primarias. Revista Pueblos y Fronteras Digital, 6(12), 167–197.
Sayer, P. (2018). Does English really open doors? Social class and English teaching in public primary schools in Mexico. System, 73(2), 58–70.
(2015). “More & earlier”: Neoliberalism and primary English education in Mexican public schools. L2 Journal, 7(3), 40–56.
Sayer, P., & López-Gopar, M. (2015). Language education in Mexico: Access, equity, and ideology. In W. Wright, O. García, & S. Boun (Eds.), The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education, (pp. 576–589). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Seargeant, P. (2013). Introduction: English and development. In E. J. Erling & P. Seargeant (Eds.), English and development: Policy, pedagogy and globalization (pp. 1–20). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Tyack, D. & Tobin, W. (1994). The ‘grammar’ of schooling: why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453-479.
Vavrus, F. (2002). Postcoloniality and English: Exploring language policy and the politics of development in Tanzania. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 373–397.
Wedell, M. (2013). Proficiency in English as a key to development? Helping teachers to help learners succeed. In E. J. Erling & P. Seargeant (Eds.), English and development: Policy, pedagogy and globalization (pp. 141–162). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Cited by (22)
Cited by 22 other publications
Bacquet, Gaston
Heugh, Kathleen
Lischka-Schmidt, Richard
Martínez-Prieto, David
Martínez-Prieto, David
Villacañas-de-Castro, Luis S.
de Dios Oyarzún, Juan & Marcela Ramos Arellano
Kostoulas, Achilleas
Quevedo-Camargo, Gladys & Juliana Reichert Assunção Tonelli
Uysal, Huseyin & Peter Sayer
Egido, Alex Alves, Juliana Reichert Assunção Tonelli & Peter De Costa
Fares, J. Karam & Kibler Amanda
Khan, Kifayatullah, Yousaf Hayat, Syed Munir Ahmad & Wasal Khan
Maksud Ali, MD, M. Obaidul Hamid, Ian Hardy & M. Adil Khan
Ali, Md. Maksud & M. Obaidul Hamid
Ali, Md. Maksud & M. Obaidul Hamid
Guedes Seccato, Mariana, Juliana Reichert Assunção Tonelli & Helena Vitalina Selbach
Romero, Gloria
Villacañas de Castro, Luis S., Laura M. Moreno-Serrano & Clàudia Giner Real
GUERRETTAZ, ANNE MARIE
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
