Article published In: Policy and practice in early language learning:
Edited by Janet Enever and Patricia Driscoll
[AILA Review 32] 2019
► pp. 10–35
CLASSROOM PEDAGOGY
Looking beyond the local
Equity as a global concern in Early Language Learning
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 7 April 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00019.ene
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00019.ene
Abstract
Around the world, the popularity of English has escalated, particularly at the primary school level (Butler, Y. G. (2015). English language education among young learners in East Asia: A review of current research. Language Teaching, 48(3), 303–342. ), yet provision of sufficient qualified teacher expertise to meet demand
continues to be inadequate. The OECD report on Equity and Quality in Education reports that: “The highest performing education
systems are those that combine equity with quality. They give all children opportunities for a good quality education” (. (2012). Equity and quality in education. Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Paris: OECD. ). This paper adopts a sociohistorical perspective to critically examine the
OECD criteria of achieving equity and quality through fairness and inclusiveness with reference
to Uruguay, India and China – all contexts where English has been introduced at primary and kindergarten levels. The analysis
draws on data from classroom observations, interviews with teachers and key stakeholders. Findings indicate that while access to
the quality provision of English in primary schools and kindergartens has been substantially expanded in recent years in each
jurisdiction, the challenges of ensuring universal quality provision have proved complex under conditions where the pre-existing
historical and political contexts have limited progress towards equity.
Keywords: Early Language Learning, global, equity, political
Article outline
- Introduction
- A brief history of primary foreign languages provision
- Conceptualising equity in education
- Equity and digital technology in Uruguay
- Uruguay national curriculum background
- A brief historical perspective on language and language planning in Uruguay
- Current provision for primary foreign languages in Uruguay
- Measuring equity in primary foreign language provision in Uruguay
- Equity and free primary education in India
- Background of primary education provision in India
- A brief historical perspective on language and language planning in India
- Current languages provision in Indian primary schools
- Evaluating equity in primary languages provision in India
- Equity in language education for Shanghai kindergartens
- Kindergarten provision in Shanghai
- A brief historical perspective on language and language planning in China
- Current languages provision in Shanghai kindergartens
- Evaluating equity in primary languages provision in Shanghai kindergartens
- Discussion and conclusions
References
References (64)
ANEP. (2008). Documentos de la comisión de políticas lingüisticas en la educación pública (Documents of commission on language policy for public education). Uruguay: Administración Nacional de Educación Pública.
. (2017). Marco curricular de referencia nacional. Uruguay: Administración Nacional de Educación Pública (ANEP) (English translation Federico Brum). Available at: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
Annamalai, E. (2005). Nation-building in a globalized world: Language choice and education in India. In A. M. Y. Lin & P. W. Martin (Eds.), Decolonisation, globalisation, language-in-education policy and practice (pp. 20–37). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(2006). India: Language situation. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed., Vol. 51, pp. 610–613). Oxford: Elsevier.
Banegas, D. L. (2013). ELT through videoconferencing in primary schools in Uruguay: First steps. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 179–188.
Batibo, H. M. (2014). Searching for an optimal national language policy for sustainable development. In H. McIlwraith (Ed.), Language rich Africa. The Cape Town language and development conference. Looking beyond 2015 (pp. 16–20). London: British Council.
Bertolotti, V., & Coll, M. (2014). Retrato lingüístico del Uruguay. Un enfoque histórico sobre las lenguas en la región. Universidad de la República, Uruguay: Comisión Sectorial de Educación Permanente. Available at: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
Bhattacharya, U. (2013). Mediating inequalities: Exploring English-medium instruction in a suburban Indian village school. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 164–184.
Boli, J., Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (1985). Explaining the origins and expansion of mass education. Comparative Education Review, 29(2), 145–170.
Brechner, M. (2017). Prologue. In Plan Ceibal (Eds.), 10 años Plan Ceibal: Hicimos historia haciendo future (10 years of Plan Ceibal: We made history by making the future) (p. 10). Montevideo: Plan Ceibal.
Brovetto, C. A. (2011). Alcances y limitaciones del uso de tecnologías para la enseñanza de inglés en educación primaria [Scope and limitations of the use of technologies for the teaching of English in primary education]. In L. Behares (Ed.), El V encuentro internacional de investigadores en políticas lingüísticas [Fifth International meeting of researchers in language policy] (pp. 37–41). Montevideo, Uruguay: Asociación de Universidades Grupo Montevideo.
Butler, Y. G. (2015). English language education among young learners in East Asia: A review of current research. Language Teaching, 48(3), 303–342.
Canagarajah, S. (2009). The plurilingual tradition and the English language in South Asia. In L. Lim & E. L. Low (Eds.), Multilingual, globalising Asia. Implications for policy and education. AILA Review, 221, 5–22.
Canale, G. (2015). Mapping conceptual change: The ideological struggle for the meaning of EFL in Uruguayan education. L2 Journal, 7(3), 15–39. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (8 September, 2018).
Center on International Education Benchmarking. (2019). Shanghai, China: Supporting equity. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
Chandrasekhar, S., & Bhattacharya, L. (2018). Understanding the scope of the challenge and moving towards a coherent policy framework for education for seasonal migrants at the state level in India (Background paper for Global Education Monitoring Report 2019). Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
Chick, J. K. (1996). Safe-talk: Collusion in apartheid education. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Society and the language classroom (pp. 21–39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Cui, X., & Yuan, A. (2006). 对目前国内幼儿园双语教育中存在偏差的分析及对策的研究 [The analysis of current issues in bilingual education in kindergartens and solutions]. 外语艺术教育研究 [Journal of Foreign Language Education], 11, 64–67.
Cyranek, G. (Ed.). (2011). Plan Ceibal in Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: UNESCO. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
Feng, A. (2009). English in China. Convergence and divergence in policy and practice. In L. Lim & E-L. Low (Eds.), Multilingual, globalising Asia. Implications for policy and education. AILA Review, 221, 85–103.
Gao, X. (2015). The ideological framing of ‘dialect’: An analysis of mainland China’s state media coverage of ‘dialect crisis’ (2002–2012). Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 361, 468–482.
Government of India. (2009). Right of children to free and compulsory education act (RTE). New Delhi, India: The Gazette of India. Retrieved from <[URL]> (28 August, 2018).
. (2016). National plan of action for children, 2016. Ministry of Women and child development. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
Hu, B., Zhou, Y., Li, K., & Roberts, S. K. (2014). Examining program quality disparities between urban and rural kindergartens in China: Evidence from Zhejiang. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(4), 461–483.
Kaplan, G., & Brovetto, C. (2019). Ceibal en Inglés: Innovation, teamwork and technology. In G. Stanley (Ed.), Innovations in education. Remote teaching (pp. 28–35). London: British Council.
MEC. (2008). Ley general de educación. Ley No. 18.437 [General education law. No. 18,437], Ministerio de Educación y Cultura. República Oriental del Uruguay. Montevideo: Dirección Nacional de Impresiones y Publicaciones Oficiales.
Mohanty, A. K., Panda, M., & Pal, R. (2010). Language policy in education and classroom practices in India. Is the teacher a cog in the policy wheel? In K. Menken & O. Garcia (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 211–231). New York, NY: Routledge.
Morley, G., & Glazzard, J. (2013), Kindergartens in China: A report into private and state provision in Beijing. Early Years Educator (EYE), 13(12), 38–44.
Nair, P. S. K. (2015). Does medium of instruction affect learning outcomes? Evidence using young lives longitudinal data from Andhra Pradesh, India. PERI ESP Working Paper Series, 681, 7–35. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
NCERT. (1999). Sixth all India education survey. Main report. New Delhi, India: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
. (2005). National curriculum framework. New Delhi, India: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
. (2006). National focus group on the teaching of Indian languages. Position paper. New Delhi, India: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
. (2014). Learning indicators and learning outcomes at the elementary stage. New Delhi, India: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
. (2012). Equity and quality in education. Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Paris: OECD.
Plan Ceibal. (2017). Adaptive assessment of English language in the Uruguayan educational system – 2017. Executive summary. Montevideo, Uruguay: British Council.
Rokita-Jaśkow, J., & Ellis, M. (2019). Early instructed second language acquisition. Pathways to competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Rovegno, S. (2019). From classroom teacher to English teacher. In G. Stanley (Ed.), Innovations in education. Remote teaching (pp. 58–60). London: British Council.
RTE Forum. (2018). Status of implementation of the right of children to free and compulsory education act, 2009 (2017–18). Report. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
Soysal, Y. N., & Strang, D. (1989). Construction of the first mass education systems in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Sociology of Education, 62(4), 277–288.
Spolsky, B. (2014). Language management in the People’s Republic of China. Language, 90(4), 165–179.
Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2004). The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project. Sure Start. Nottingham: DfES Publications.
Tucker, M. S. (Ed.) (2014). Chinese lessons: Shanghai’s rise to the top of the PISA league tables. Washington, DC: NCEE. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
UN. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. Retrieved from: [URL] (20 November, 2019).
. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
. (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 revision. World population 2017 Wallchart. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. St/ESA/SER.A/398. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030. Incheon declaration. Declaration on the future of global education until 2030. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
. (2016). Global education monitoring report 2016 (GEM). Education for people and planet. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
. (2018). Handbook on measuring equity in education. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
. (2018). Global education monitoring report 2019 (GEM). Building bridges not walls. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
UNICEF. (2017a). UNICEF annual report, Uruguay. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
. (2017b). UNICEF Annual report, India. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
Wang, Q. (2009). Primary English in China: Policy, curriculum and implementation. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning (pp. 277–310). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
World Bank. (2016). World Bank data for India, population. World Bank Group. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
. (2019). The World Bank in Uruguay. Overview. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
Yu, Z., & Ruan, J. (2012). Early childhood education in China. In J. Ruan & C. B. Leung (Eds.), Perspectives on teaching and learning English literacy in China (pp. 51–65). Dordrecht: Springer.
Young Lives Study. (2000–2015). Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of International Development. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (20 November, 2019).
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Haidar, Sham
Inostroza, Maria-Jesus, Cristhian Perez-Villalobos & Pia Tabalí
Enever, Janet
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
