Article published In: Transdisciplinarity in Applied Linguistics:
Edited by Daniel Perrin and Claire Kramsch
[AILA Review 31] 2018
► pp. 113–134
Applied linguistics as epistemic assemblage
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 12 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00015.pen
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00015.pen
Abstract
Any discussion of transdisciplinary applied linguistics needs to engage with three central questions. First, while
interdisciplinarity may allow for disciplines to stay in place and engage with each other,
transdisciplinarity implies a space beyond or above disciplines. As a result, we have to consider whether
applied linguistics is seen as a discipline (in which case it is not transdisciplinary) or whether it is seen as a
transdisciplinary field of study (in which case it is not a discipline). Second, while applied linguists may engage with work from
other fields – sociology, geography, philosophy, cognitive science are common examples – this does not necessarily mean that we
engage with those fields as disciplines. Rather, the engagement with such work is often on the basis that relevant thinkers are
engaging themselves with broader epistemic shifts. Such work may therefore be seen as having to do with epistemes
rather than disciplines. Third, a focus on transdisciplinarity obscures broader concerns about unequal relations of knowledge
production, particularly between North and South. If applied linguistics is to become a responsible field of work, it needs to
engage with southern epistemologies. In order to do so, applied linguistic practices can be more usefully understood as temporary
assemblages of thought and action that come together at particular moments when language-related concerns need to be addressed.
This flexible account helps us see how applied linguistic practices are assemblages of different language-oriented projects,
epistemes and matters of concern.
Keywords: assemblage, episteme, southern theory, posthumanism, the commons
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Applied linguistics as an unlikely discipline
- 3.Turns, disciplines and epistemes
- 4.North-South knowledge hierarchies
- 5.Conclusion: Refreshing epistemological repertoires
References
References (77)
Aboelezz, M. (2016). The geosemiotics of Tahrir Square: A study of the relationship between discourse and place. In L. Martín Rojo (Ed.), Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements (pp. 23–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Albury, N. J. (2016). Defining Māori language revitalisation: A project in folk linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 201, 287–311.
Amin, A. & Howell, P. (2016). Thinking the commons. In A. Amin & P. Howell (Eds.), Releasing the commons: rethinking the futures of the commons (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.
Armaline, W. (2009). Thoughts on anarchist pedagogy and epistemology. In R. Amster, A. DeLeon, L. Fernandez, A. Nocella II, & D. Shannon (Eds.), Contemporary anarchist studies: An introductory anthology of anarchy in the academy (pp. 136–146). New York: Routledge.
Becher, T. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Broughton, B. (2017). Popular education and mass literacy campaigns. Beyond ‘New Literacy Studies’. In K. Yasukawa & S. Black (Eds.), Beyond economic interests: Critical perspectives on adult literacy and numeracy in a globalised world (pp. 149–164). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2018). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–54.
Chun, C. (2016). Mobilities of a linguistic landscape at Los Angeles City Hall Park. In L. Martín Rojo (Ed.), Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements (pp. 77–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Coupland, N. (Ed.) (2016). Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Couzens, V. & Eira, C. (2014). Meeting point: Parameters for the study of revival languages. In P. Austin & J. Sallabank (Eds.), Endangered languages: Beliefs and ideologies in language documentation and revitalisation (pp. 313–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dasgupta, P. (1997). Foreword. In L. Khubchandani Revisioning Boundaries: A plurilingual ethos (pp. 11–29). New Delhi: Sage.
Davies, A. (1999). An introduction to applied linguistics: From theory to practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Dawney, L., S. Kirwan, Brigstocke, S. & J. (2016). Introduction: The promise of the commons. In J. Brigstocke, L. Dawney, & S. Kirwan (Eds.), Space, Power and the Commons: The Struggle for Alternative Futures (pp. 12–31). London: Routledge.
Day, R. (2005). Gramsci Is Dead: Anarchist currents in the newest social movements, London: Pluto Press.
De Korne, H., & Leonard, W. (2017). Reclaiming languages: Contesting and decolonising ‘language endangerment’ from the ground up. In W. Y. Leonard & H. D. Korne (Eds.), Language Documentation and Description (Vol. 141, pp. 5–14). London: EL Publishing.
De Souza, L. M. (2017). Epistemic diversity, lazy reason, and ethical translation in postcolonial contexts. The case of Indigenous educational policy in Brazil. In C. Kerfoot & K. Hyltenstam (Eds.), Entangled discourses: South-north orders of visibility (pp. 189–208). New York: Routledge.
Di Carlo, P. (2018). Towards an understanding of African endogenous multilingualism: Ethnography, language ideologies, and the supernatural. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 2541, pp. 139–163.
Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
García, O. & Li Wei. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2017). Other minds: The octopus and the evolution of intelligent life. London: William Collins.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2001). New ways of meaning. The challenge to applied linguistics. In Fill, A. & Mühlhäusler, P. (Eds.), The Ecolinguistics Reader. Language, ecology and environment (pp. 175–202). London: Continuum.
Harris, R. (1990). On redefining linguistics. In H. Davis & T. Taylor (Eds.), Redefining linguistics (pp. 18–52). London: Routledge.
Kaplan, R. (2002). Preface. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kerfoot, C. & Hyltenstam, K. (2017). Introduction: Entanglement and orders of visibility. In C. Kerfoot & K. Hyltenstam (Eds.). Entangled Discourses: South-North Orders of Visibility (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.
Kramsch, C. (2008). Ecological perspectives on foreign language education. Language Teaching, 411, 389–408.
Kuhn, G. (2009). Anarchism, postmodernity, and poststructuralism. In R. Amster, A. DeLeon, L. Fernandez, A. Nocella II, & D. Shannon (Eds.), Contemporary anarchist studies: An introductory anthology of anarchy in the academy (pp. 18–25). New York: Routledge.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Larsen, S. & Johnson, J. (2016). The agency of place: Toward a more-than-human geographical self. GeoHumanities, 2(1), 149–166.
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
Levon, E. (2017). Situating sociolinguistics: Coupland – Theoretical Debates. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(2), 272–288.
Li, Wei. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Makoni, S. (2003). Review of A. Davies, An introduction to applied linguistics: From practice to theory and A. Pennycook, Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 130–137.
Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages, in S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 1–41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(2012). Disinventing multilingualism: from monological multilingualism to multilingua francas. In M. Martin-Jones, A. Blackledge & A. Creese (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Multilingualism (pp. 439–453). Routledge: New York.
Martín Rojo, L. (2016). Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements. In L. Martín Rojo (Ed.), Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
May, S. (2014). Disciplinary divides, knowledge construction, and the multilingual turn. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 7–31). London: Routledge.
McNamara, T. (2015). Applied linguistics: The challenge of theory. Applied Linguistics. 36(4): 466–477.
Mignolo, W. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mufwene, S. (2016). A cost-and-benefit approach to language loss. In L. Filipović & M. Pütz (Eds.), Endangered Languages and Languages in Danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights (pp. 115–143). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ndhlovu, F. (2017). Southern development discourse for Southern Africa: Linguistic and cultural imperatives. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 12(2): 89–109.
Oda, M. & Takada, T. (2005). English Language Teaching in Japan. In G. Braine (Ed.), Teaching English to the World: History, Curriculum and Practice (pp. 93–101). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Otsuji, E. & Pennycook, A. (2018). The translingual advantage: Metrolingual student repertoires, in Choi, J. & Ollerhead, S. (Eds.), Plurilingualism in teaching and learning: Complexities across contexts (pp. 71–88). New York: Routledge.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2006). Uma lingüîstica aplicada transgressiva. In L. P. Moita Lopes (Org.) Por uma lingüîstica aplicada indisciplinar (pp. 67–84). Sao Paulo: Parabola.
(2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269–282.
Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2014). Metrolingual multitasking and spatial repertoires: ‘Pizza mo two minutes coming’. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 161–184.
(2017). Fish, phone cards and semiotic assemblages in two Bangladeshi shops in Sydney and Tokyo. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 434–450.
Rampton, B. (1997). Retuning in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 71, 3–25.
Santos, B. d. S. (2012). Public sphere and epistemologies of the south. Africa Development, 37(1), 43–67.
(2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the south. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Schatzki, T. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. (2007). Nexus analysis: Refocusing ethnography on action. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 608–625.
Thorne, S., & Lantolf, J. (2007). A linguistics of communicative activity. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 170–195). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Thurlow, C. (2016). Queering critical discourse studies or/and performing ‘post-class’ ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(5), 485–514.
Toohey, K., Dagenais, D., Fodor, A., Hof, L., Nuñez, O., & Singh, A. (2015). ‘That sounds so cooool’: Entanglements of children, digital tools, and literacy practices. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 461–485.
Trowler, P. (2014). Depicting and Researching Disciplines: Strong and moderate essentialist approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 39 (10), 1720–1731.
Trowler, P., Saunders, M. & Bamber, V. (Eds.). (2012). Tribes and territories in the 21st-century. Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education. London: Routledge.
Varis, P. (2017). Superdiverse times and places: Media, mobility, conjunctures and structures of feeling. In K. Arnaut, M. Sif Karrebaek, M. Spotti, & J. Blommaert (Eds.). Engaging superdiversity: Recombining spaces, times and language practices (pp. 25–46). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Moral evaluation in critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies.
Cited by (43)
Cited by 43 other publications
Espirito Santo, Diogo Oliveira do
Bangou, Francis & Cameron W. Smith
Brown, Kimberley
Coffey, Simon
Curry, Niall, Tony McEnery & Gavin Brookes
da Silva, Leonardo, Priscila Fabiane Farias & Litiane Barbosa Macedo
Fahimpour, Zahra, Reza Khany & Timothy Teo
Krause-Alzaidi, Lara-Stephanie
Morton, Tom
2025. Beyond inter- and transdisciplinarity. Journal of English-Medium Instruction 4:1 ► pp. 123 ff.
Navarro, Diego, Constanza Tolosa & Ben Egerton
Pennycook, Alastair, Kleber Aparecido da Silva & Leketi Makalela
Shvetsova, Iryna, Svitlana Lytvynska, Tetiana Davydova, Svitlana Romanchuk & Olha Rusavska
Vasilopoulos, Eugenia (Gene) & Francis Bangou
Vázquez, María Iglesias, Karolina Waldon & Christopher J. Jenks
Yazan, Bedrettin & Ufuk Keleş
Dong, Dahui & Ming Yuan Dong
R’boul, Hamza, Hassan Belhiah & Anissa Elhaffari
Selvi, Ali Fuad, Bedrettin Yazan & Ahmar Mahboob
Wajda, Edyta & Anna Sanczyk-Cruz
Everth, Thomas, Laura Gurney & Chris Eames
Hammine, Madoka & Nathanael Rudolph
Hodgetts, Darrin, Veronica Hopner, Stuart Carr, Daniel Bar-Tal, James H. Liu, Raymond Saner, Lichia Yiu, John Horgan, Rosalind H Searle, Gustavo Massola, Moh A. Hakim, Leo Marai, Pita King & Fathali Moghaddam
Loo, Daron Benjamin & Aunyarat Jane Tandamrong
Raudaskoski, Pirkko
Riner, Robin Conley & Rachel George
Rocha, Claudia Hilsdorf, Ivani Rodrigues Silva, Jéssica Vasconcelos Dorta & Valéria Campos Muniz
Rudolph, Nathanael
Rudolph, Nathanael
Sondari, Parawati Siti
Sondari, Parawati Siti
Tripp, Alayo
Tripp, Alayo & Benjamin Munson
Tupas, Ruanni
Pennycook, Alastair
Pennycook, Alastair
Razavipour, Kioumars & Behnaz Raji
Wajda, Edyta
Graf, Eva-Maria & Frédérick Dionne
Whitehouse, Marlies, Henrik Rahm, Séverine Wozniak, Steven Breunig, Gianni De Nardi, Frédérick Dionne, Misa Fujio, Eva-Maria Graf, Igor Matic, Christopher J. McKenna, Felix Steiner & Silga Sviķe
Yousefi, Moslem & Fatemeh Mardian
2021. Review of Friedrich (2019): Applied linguistics in the real world. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 44:3 ► pp. 347 ff.
Chaka, Chaka
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
