Cover not available

In:Consciousness: New perspectives, artificial consciousness, and the scientific progress of psychology
Sam S. Rakover
[Advances in Consciousness Research 96] 2026
► pp. 165–182

References

This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Algom, D. (1991). Issues in the history of psychology [Heb.]. Tel-Aviv Ministry of Defense Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). A history of psychology. Ra’anana, Israel: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, C., & Trestman, M. (2016). Animal consciousness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Animal consciousness. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atmanspacher, H. (2017). Quantum approaches to brain and mind. In S. Schneider & M. Velmans (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Quantum approaches to consciousness. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avidan, G., Tanzer, M., & Behrmann, M. (2011). Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2541–2552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avramides, A. (2020). Other minds. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). Other minds. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). The global workspace theory of consciousness: Predictions and results. In S. Schneider & M. Velmans (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., & Morsella, E. (2008). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 73–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Free will in scientific psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 14–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayne, T. (2023). Where does consciousness start? Debate is heating up over some of the leading theories. Science (alert).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayne, T., Seth, A. K., Massimini, M., Shepherd, J., Cleeremans, A., Fleming, S. M., Malach, R., Mattingley, J. B., Menon, D. K., Owen, A. M., Peters, M. A. K., Razi, A., & Mudrik, L. (2024). Tests for consciousness in humans and beyond. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(5), 454–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, D. E., Raifa, H., & Tversky, A. (1988). Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions in decision making. In D. E. Bell, H. Raifa, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. xx–xx). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berezow, A. (2012, July 13). Why psychology isn’t science. The LA Times. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birch, J. (2024). The edge of sentience: Risk and precaution in Humans, other animals, and AI. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bird, A. (2007). What is scientific progress? Noûs, 41(1), 64–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blackbum, S. (Ed., 2016). Ship of Theseus. The Oxford dictionary of philosophy (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blackmore, S. (2013). Consciousness: An introduction (3rd ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Are humans the only conscious animal? Decoding the puzzle of human consciousness. Scientific American, 319, 48–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, R., Brascamp, J., & Heeger, D. J. (2014). Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1641), 20130211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Block, N. (1995). How many concepts of consciousness? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(2), 272–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(5–6), 481–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourget, D. (2017). The role of consciousness in grasping and understanding. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 95(2), 285–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brass, M., Furstenberg, A., & Mele, A. R. (2019). Why neuroscience does not disprove free will. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 102, 251–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, plans and practical reason. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bringmann, L. F., & Eronen, M. I. (2016). Heating up the measurement debate: What psychologists can learn from the history of physics. Theory & Psychology, 26(1), 27–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R., Lau, H., & LeDoux, J. E. (2019). Understanding the higher-order approach to consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 754–768. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burkeman, O. (2015, January 21). Why can’t the world’s greatest minds solve the mystery of consciousness? The Guardian.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busigny, T., & Rossion, B. (2010). Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect. Cortex, 46(8), 965–981. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butlin, P., Long, R., Elmoznino, E., Bengio, Y., Birch, J., Constant, A., Deane, G., Fleming, S. F., Xu Ji, C. F., Kanai, R., Klein, C., Lindsay, G., Michel, M., Liad Mudrik, L., Peters, M. A. K., Schwitzgebel, E., Simon, J., & VanRullen, R. (2023). Consciousness in artificial intelligence: Insights from the science of consciousness. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buttazzo, G. (2001). Artificial consciousness: Utopia or real possibility? Computer, 34(7), 24–30. [URL]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrne, A. (1997). Some like it HOT: Consciousness and higher-order thoughts. Philosophical Studies, 86(2), 103–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, N. R. (1957). Foundations of Science. Dover.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, S. M. (2016). The big picture: On the origins of life, meaning, and the universe itself. Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2004). HOP over FOR, HOT theory. In Gennaro, R. J. (Ed.) Higher-order theories of consciousness: An anthology (pp. 115–135). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Higher-order theories of consciousness. In S. Schneider & M. Velmans (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carruthers, P., & Gennaro, R. (2020). Higher-order theories of consciousness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cea, I., Negro, N., & Signorelli, C. M. (2024). Only consciousness truly exists? Two problems for IIT 4.0’s ontology. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1485433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chakravartty, A. (2017). Scientific realism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.). Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. (1997). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. In J. Shear (Ed.), Explaining consciousness: The hard problem (pp. 9–32). MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chella, A., Cangelosi, A., Metta, G., & Bringsjord, S. (2019). Editorial: Consciousness in humanoid robots. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 6, Article 17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chella, A., & Manzotti, R. (2011). Artificial consciousness. In V. Cutsuridis et al. (Eds.), Perception-action cycle: Models, architectures, and hardware. Springer Science + Business Media. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chrisley, R. (2008). Philosophical foundations of artificial consciousness. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 44(2), 119–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1988). Matter and consciousness (Rev. ed). MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Civile, C., McLaren, R. P., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2014). The face inversion effect — parts and wholes: Individual features and their configuration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(4), 728–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). The face inversion effect: Roles of first — and second-order configural information. American Journal of Psychology, 129(1), 23–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cleeremans, A., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2022). Consciousness matters: Phenomenal experience has functional value. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 1, 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cliff, N. (1992). Abstract measurement theory and the revolution that never happened. Psychological Science, 3(3), 186–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, D. (2023). The Chinese Room argument. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H., Dawes, R. M., & Tversky, A. (1970). Mathematical psychology: An elementary introduction. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, R., & Shallice, T. (1995). SOAR and the case for unified theories of cognition. Cognition, 55(2), 115–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cosmelli, D., Lachaux, J.-P., & Thompson, E. (2007). Neurodynamical approaches to consciousness. In P. Zelazo, M. Moscovich, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 731–774). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crane, T. (1999). The autonomy of psychology. In Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. (Eds.), MIT encyclopedia of cognitive sciences. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crevier, D. (1993). AI: The tumultuous history of the search for artificial intelligence. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008). Consciousness and explanation. In L. Weiskrantz & M. Davies (Eds.), Frontiers of consciousness: Chichele Lectures. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dawkins, M. S. (1987). Minding and mattering. In C. Blakemore and S. Greenfield (Eds.), Mindwaves (pp. 151–160). Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Unravelling animal behavior (2nd ed.). Longman Scientific & Technical.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Regt, H. W., Leonelli, S., & Eigner, K. (Eds.). (2009). Scientific understanding: Philosophical perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2014). Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. Viking Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Lau, H., & Kouider, S. (2021). What is consciousness, and could machines have it? In J. von Braun et al. (Eds.), Robotics, AI, and humanity: Science, ethics, and policy (pp. 43–56). Springer Open Access. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79(1–2), 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1995). The unimagined preposterousness of zombies. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(4), 322–326.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derakhshani, M., Diósi, L., Laubenstein, M., Piscicchia, K., & Curceanu, C. (2022). At the crossroad of the search for spontaneous radiation and the Orch OR consciousness theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 42, 8–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(2), 107–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2010). Goals, attention, and (un)consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 467–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doerig, A., Schurger, A., Herss, K., & Herzog, M. (2019). The unfolding argument: Why IIT and other causal structure theories cannot explain consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 72, 49–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doerig, A., Schuster, A., & Herzog, M. H. (2021). Hard criteria for empirical theories of consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 41–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (1972). What computers can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elsey, J., & Moss, D. (2023, May 12). Public opinion of AI policy and risk. Rethink Priorities. empathize? Yes. Scientific American Presents: Exploring Intelligence, 9, 66–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eronen, M. I., & Bringmann, L. F. (2021). The theory crisis in psychology: How to move forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 779–788. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estes, W. K. (1950). Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57(2), 94–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fabbro, F., Cantone, D., Feruglio, S., & Cresccentini, C. (2019). Origin and evolution of human consciousness. In M. A. Hofman (Ed.), Progress in brain research. Vol. 250 (pp. 317–343). Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and SciencesGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fallon, F. (2019). Integrated information theory of consciousness. The Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL], 2023Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Integrated information theory of consciousness. The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Integrated information theory of consciousness. The internet encyclopedia of philosophy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fallshore, M., & Bartholow, J. (2003). Recognition of emotion from inverted schematic drawings of faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96(1), 236–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farrell, B. A. (1950). Experience. Mind, 59(234), 170–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faverio, M., & Tyson, A. (2023, November 21). What the data says about Americans’ views of artificial intelligence. Short reads, Pew Research Center.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feinberg, T. E., & Mallatt, J. (2016). The ancient origins of consciousness: How the brain created experience. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. J. (2015). Everybody knows psychology is not a real science. American Psychologist, 70(6), 527–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flanagan, O. (1992). Consciousness reconsidered. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleming, S. M., Frith, C., Goodale, M., Lau, H., LeDoux, J. E., & Lee, A. L. F. (2023). The integrated information theory of consciousness as pseudoscience. PsyArXiv (Preprint). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1974). Special sciences, or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis. Synthese, 28(2), 97–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Special sciences: Still autonomous after all these years. In J. Fodor (Ed.), In critical condition: Polemical essays on cognitive science and philosophy of mind (pp. 9–24). MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frackowiak, R. S. J., et al. (2004). Human brain function (2nd ed.). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franz, D. J. (2022). “Are psychological attributes quantitative?” is not an empirical question: Conceptual confusions in the measurement debate. Theory & Psychology, 32(1), 131–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedenberg, J., & Silverman, G. (2016). Cognitive science: An introduction to the study of mind (3rd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fu, G., Dong, Y., Quinn, P. C., Xiao, W. S., Wang, Q., Chen, G., Pascalis, O., & Lee, K. (2015). Effects of visual expertise on a novel eye-size illusion: Implications for holistic face processing. Vision Research, 113(Pt A), 104–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (2009). Naive and obvious questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 340–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gajewski, P. D., Schlegel, K., & Stoerig, P. (2008). Effects of human race and face inversion on the N170: A cross-race study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 22(3), 157–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr. (1970). Chimpanzees: Self recognition. Science, 167(3914), 86–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallup, G., Jr. (1998). Animal self-awareness: A debate — can animals empathize? Yes. Scientific American Presents: Exploring Intelligence, 9, 66–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Anderson, J. R. (2020). Self-recognition in animals: Where do we stand 50 years later? Lessons from Cleaner Wrasse and other species. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(1), 46–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gamez, D. (2014). The measurement of consciousness: a framework for the scientific study of consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 714. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia-Marques, L., & Ferreira, M. B. (2011). Friends and foes of theory construction in psychological science: Vague dichotomies, unified theories of cognition, and the new experimentalism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 192–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gauthier, I., & Bukach, C. (2007). Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? Cognition, 103(3), 322–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1967). The split brain in man. Scientific American, 217(2), 24–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gennaro, R. J. (2004). Higher-order theories of consciousness: An overview. In R. J. Gennaro (Ed.), Higher-order theories of consciousness: An anthology (pp. 1–13). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gennaro, R. T. (2012). The consciousness paradox: Consciousness, concepts, and higher-order thoughts. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Consciousness. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023a). Consciousness. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]/Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023b). Higher-order theories of consciousness. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilaie-Dotan, S., Gelbard-Sagiv, H., & Malach, R. (2010). Perceptual shape sensitivity to upright and inverted faces is reflected in neuronal adaptation. NeuroImage, 50(1), 383–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glymore, C. N. (1980). Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2008). Recurrent transient underdetermination and the glass half full. Philosophical Studies, 137(1), 141–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Other minds: The octopus, the sea, and the deep origins of consciousness. William Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goff, P., Seager, W., & Allen-Hermanson, S. (2022). Panpsychism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. (2025). Your mind is not a machine: Why human minds evolved to survive, not to compute. Psychology Today, Posted July 5. Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2009). Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science, 324(5927), 646–648.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldstien, A., & Hassin, R. (2017). Commentary: definitely maybe: can unconscious processes perform the same functions as conscious processes? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, E. C. (2020). Understanding in epistemology. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimm, S. R. (2011). Understanding. In S. Bernecker and D. Pritchard (Eds.), Routledge companion to epistemology (pp. 84–94). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). How understanding people differs from understanding the natural world. Philosophical Issues, 26(1), 209–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Understanding as an intellectual virtue. In H. Battaly (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of virtue epistemology (pp. 340–351). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grush, R., & Churchland, P. S. (1995). Gaps in Penrose’s toilings. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(1), 10–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haig, B. D. (2014). Investigating the psychological world: Scientific method in the behavioral sciences. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hameroff, S. R., & Penrose, R. (1996). Conscious events as orchestrated spacetime selections. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(1), 36–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the “Orch OR” theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42, 335–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Can a machine be conscious? How? Journal of Consciousness, 10(4–5), 67–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hassin, R. (2013). Yes it can: On the functional abilities of the human unconscious. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 195–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatfield, G. (2018). René Descartes. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heene, M. (2013). Additive conjoint measurement and the resistance toward falsifiability in psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heil, J. (2003). Mental causation. In S. P. Stich & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to philosophy of mind (pp. 214–234). Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1966). Philosophy of natural science. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henriques, G. (2016, January 27). The “Is psychology a science?” debate. Psychology Today. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herzig, A., Lorini, E., Perrussel, L., & Xiao, Z. (2017). BDI logics for BDI architectures: Old problems, new perspectives. Künstliche Intelligenz, 31(1), 73–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hesselmann, G., & Moors, P. (2015). Definitely maybe: can unconscious processes perform the same functions as conscious processes? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 584. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilgard, E. R., & Bower, G. H. (1966). Theories of learning (3rd ed.). Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (2005). Sleep is of the brain, by the brain and for the brain. Nature, 437(7063), 1254–1256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horgan, T., & Woodward, J. (1985). Folk psychology is here to stay. Philosophy Review, 94(2), 197–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horne, J. (2022). A framework for studying consciousness. CONSCIOUSNESS: Ideas and Research for the Twenty-First Century, 9(1), Article 1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horne, Z., Muradoglu, M., & Cimpian, A. (2019). Explanation as a cognitive process. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2), 187–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunt, T., Ericson, M., & Schooler, J. (2022). Where’s my consciousness-ometer? How to test for the presence and complexity of consciousness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 1150–1165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutto, D., & Ravenscroft, I. (2021). Folk psychology as a theory. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irribarra, D. T. (2021). A pragmatic perspective of measurement. Springer Briefs in Psychology. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irvine, E. (2013a). Measures of consciousness. Philosophy Compass, 8(3), 285–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). Consciousness as a scientific concept: A philosophy of science perspective. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal qualia. Philosophical Quarterly, 32(127), 127–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacob, P. (2023). Intentionality. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaynes, J. (1990). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jogalekar, A. (2013, August 13). Is psychology a “real” science? Does it really matter? Scientific American Blog Network. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joiner, W. J. (2016). Unravelling the evolutionary determinants of sleep. Current Biology, 26(20), R1073–R1087. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, M. W., & Hunt, T. (2023). Electromagnetic-field theories of qualia: Can they improve upon standard neuroscience? Frontiers in Psychology, 14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. M., & Craver, C. F. (2011). The explanatory force of dynamical and mathematical models in neuroscience: A mechanistic perspective. Philosophy of Science, 78(4), 601–627. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kays, J. L., Hurley, R. A., & Taber, K. H. (2012). The dynamic brain: Neuroplasticity and mental health. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 24(2), 118–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keas, M. N. (2018) Systematizing the theoretical virtues. Synthese, 195, 2761–2793. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keijzer, F. (2001). Representation and behavior. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khalifa, K. (2013). The role of explanation in understanding. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64(1), 161–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Understanding, explanation, and scientific knowledge. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, C.-Y., & Blake, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible “invisible.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(8), 381–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J. (1996). Philosophy of mind. Boulder. Westview Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Mind in a physical world: An essay on the mind–body problem and mental causation. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Précis of mind in a physical world. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65(3), 640–643. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Philosophy of mind (3rd ed.). Westview Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirk, R. (2023). Zombies. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirkeby-Hinrup, A., Stephens, A., Balogh Sjostrand, A., & Overgaard, M. (2025). Methodological issues in conscious research: Theory comparison, the role of empirical evidence, and a replication crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1633907. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleiner, J. (2020). Brain states matter. A reply to the unfolding argument. Consciousness and Cognition, 85, 102981. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, C. (2014, January 1). Is consciousness universal? Scientific American.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). What is consciousness? Nature, 557(7704), 8–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). The feeling of life itself: Why consciousness is widespread but can’t be computed. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M. (1975). Information representation in visual image. Cognitive Psychology, 7(3), 341–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krantz, D. H., & Wallsten, T. S. (2019). Comment on Trendler’s (2019) “Conjoint measurement undone.” Theory & Psychology, 29, 129–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kriegel, U. (2023). Self-consciousness. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. (1999) The age of spiritual machines. Texere.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacalli, T. (2024). The function(s) of consciousness: an evolutionary perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1493423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lau, H., & Rosenthal, D. (2011). Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(8), 365–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laudan, L., & Leplin, J. (1991). Empirical equivalence and underdetermination. Journal of Philosophy, 88(9), 449–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leahey, T. H. (2004). A history of psychology (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenhard, J. (2006). Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and Neyman–Pearson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(1), 69–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenharo, M. (2023). Consciousness theory slammed as “pseudoscience” — sparking uproar. Nature (news). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levine, J. (1983). Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 354–361. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Anti-materialist arguments and influential replies. In M. Velmans & S. Schneider (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (pp. 371–380). Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, R. L. (2001). Cognitive theory, SOAR. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltez (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 2178–2183). Pergamon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libet, B. (1982). Brain stimulation in the study of neuronal functions for conscious sensory experiments. Human Neurobiology, 1(4), 235–242.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(4), 529–566. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2010). Can psychology become a science? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 281–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist, 67(2), 111–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). The seductive-nomological model. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 23, 691–698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). What good is an explanation? In G. Hon & S. S. Rakover (Eds.), Explanation: Theoretical approaches and applications. Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Understanding without explanation. In H. W. de Regt, S. Leonelli, & K. Eigner (Eds.), Scientific understanding: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 43–63). University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loginov, E. V. (2024). Illusion, Moore, and Chalmers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1449314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Low, P. (2012). The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. Proceedings of the Francis Crick Memorial Conference, Churchill College, Cambridge University (pp. 1–2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucas, J. R. (1961). Minds, machines, and Gӧdel. Philosophy, 36(137), 112–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. (1972). What sort of measurement is psychophysical measurement? American Psychologist, 27(2), 96–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ludwig, K. (2003). The mind–body problem: An overview. In S. P. Stich & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to philosophy of mind (pp. 1–46). Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lycan, W. G. (2004). The superiority of HOP to HOT. In R. J. Gennaro (Ed.), Higher-order theories of consciousness: An anthology (pp. 93–113). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malle, B. F. (2009). Folk theories of consciousness. In W. P. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Consciousness (pp. 251–263). Elsevier/Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marks, L. E., & Algom, D. (1998). Psychophysical scaling. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Measurement, judgment, and decision-making (pp. 81–178). Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marx, M. H., & Cronan-Hillix, W. A. (1987). Systems and theories in psychology (4th ed.). McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mashour, G. A., Roelfsema, P., Changeux, J.-P., & Dehaene, S. (2020). Conscious processing and the global neuronal workspace hypothesis. Neuron, 105, 776–798. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, R., Büchner, I. C., & Hevesi, J. (2024). The quantitative paradigm and the nature of the human mind: The replication crisis as an epistemological crisis of quantitative psychology in view of the ontic nature of the psyche. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1390233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCorduck, P. (1979). Machines who think. W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDermott, D. (2007). Artificial intelligence and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazlo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 117–150). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGinn, C. (1989). Can we solve the mind–body problem? Mind, 98(391), 349–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKelvie, S. (1995). Emotional expression in upside-down faces: Evidence for configurational and componential processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 325–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mckilliam, A. (2025). Explanation, understanding, and the methodological problem in consciousness science. Synthese, 205(4), 142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKilliam, A. (in press). Do mechanisms matter for inferences about consciousness? Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
McKone, E. (2010). Face and object recognition: How do they differ? In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Tutorials in visual cognition (pp. 261–303). Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKone, E., & Yovel, G. (2009). Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 778–797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Megill, J. (2024). The Lucas–Penrose argument about Gӧdel’s theorem. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merker, B. (2007). Consciousness without a cerebral cortex: A challenge for neuroscience and medicine. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 30(1), 63–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michel, M. (2023). Confidence in consciousness research. WIREs Cognitive Science, 14:e1628. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: Critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milkowski, M. (2024). The computational theory of mind. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, S. M. (2015). The correlation/constitution distinction problem: Foundations, limits and explanation in consciousness science. In S. M. Miller (Ed.), The constitution of phenomenal consciousness. Toward a science and theory. Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millgram, E. (2001). Practical reasoning: The current state of play. In E. Millgram (Ed.), Varieties of practical reasoning. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morsella, E. (2005). The function of phenomenal states: Supramodular interaction theory. Psychological Review, 112(4), 1000–1021. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, V. C. (2024). Philosophy of AI: Structured overview. In N. Smuha (Ed.), Cambridge handbook on the law, ethics and policy of artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, J., & Cook, R. (2017). Revealing the mechanisms of human face perception using dynamic apertures. Cognition, 169, 25–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. Harcourt-Brace & World.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neal, J. M., & Liebert, R. M. (1986). Science and behavior: An introduction to methods of research (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness (2024, April 19). New York University, NY.
Newell, A. (1973). You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283–308). Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982). The knowledge level. AI Magazine, 2, 1–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). SOAR as a unified theory of cognition: Issues and explanations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(3), 464–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ng, Y.-K. (2023). Could artificial intelligence have consciousness? Some perspectives from neurology and parapsychology. AI & Society, 38, 425–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nieder, A. (2021). Consciousness without cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 71, 69–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, I. (2019). Scientific progress. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2019 ed.). Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsen, A. S., Juel, B. E., Thurer, B., Aamondt, A. and Storm, J. (2022). Are we really unconscious in “unconscious” states? Common assumptions revisited. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 987051. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nir, Y., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2013). Sleep and consciousness. In A. E. Cavanna, A. Nani, H. Blumenfeld, & S. Laureys (Eds.), Neuroimaging of consciousness (pp. 3–21). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nola, R., & Sankey, H. (2007). Theories of scientific method: An introduction. Acumen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. (2021). Emergent properties. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pae, H. (2025). Reflective analysis on empirical theories in consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 16:1571098. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallett, P. M., & Meng, M. (2015). Inversion effects reveal dissociations in facial expression of emotion, gender, and object processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1029. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, D. (2019). Psychoneural reduction: a perspective from neural circuits. Biology & Philosophy, 34(4), 43–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 528–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1989). The emperor’s new mind. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Shadows of the mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penrose, R., & Hameroff, S. (1995). What “gaps”? Reply to Grush and Churchland. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(1), 98–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Persuh, M. (2018). Measuring perceptual consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Persuh, M., LaRock, E., & Berger, J. (2018). Working memory and consciousness: The current state of play. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillips, I. (2018). The methodological puzzle of phenomenal consciousness. Philosophical Transactions B, 373(1755), 20170347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piccinini, G. (2020). Neurocognitive mechanisms: Explaining biological cognition. Oxford University Press (Online). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piccinini, G., and Craver, C. (2011). Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analyses as mechanism sketches. Synthese, 183(3), 283–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piepers, D. W., & Robbins, R. A. (2012). A review and clarification of the terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the face perception literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pitcher, D., Duchaine, B., Walsh, V., Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2011). The role of lateral occipital face and object areas in the face inversion effect. Neuropsychologia, 49(13), 3448–3453. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Povinelli, D. J. (1998). Animal self-awareness: A debate — can animals empathize? Maybe not. Scientific American Presents: Exploring Intelligence, 9, 72–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pritchard, D., Turri, J., & Carter, J. (2018). Knowledge. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Promet, L., & Bachman, T. (2022). A comparative analysis of empirical theories of consciousness. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research and Practice. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Causation and explanation. Acumen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers. V.2. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radner, D., & Radner, M. (1989). Animal consciousness. Prometheus Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakover, S. S. (1975). Tolerance of pain as a measure of fear. Learning and Motivation, 6(1), 43–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1979). Fish (tilapia aurea), as rats, learn shuttle better than lever-bumping (press) avoidance tasks: A suggestion for functionally similar universal reactions to conditioned fear-arousing stimulus. American Journal of Psychology, 92(3), 489–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). Role of intertrial interval following escape or avoidance response in bar-press avoidance. Learning and Motivation, 11(2), 220–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983). Hypothesizing from introspections: A model for the role of mental entities in psychological explanation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 13(2), 211–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Metapsychology: Missing links in behavior, mind and science. Paragon/Solomon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). The place of consciousness in the information processing approach: The mental-pool thought experiment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 535–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Can psychology provide a coherent account of human behavior? A proposed multi-explanation-model theory. Behavior and Philosophy, 25, 43–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). The computer that simulated John Searle in the Chinese room. New Ideas in Psychology, 17, 55–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002a). Featural vs. configurational information in faces: A conceptual and empirical analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 93(1), 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002b). Scientific rules of the game and the mind/body: A critique based on the theory of measurement. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(11), 52–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). The configural processing hypothesis and the face-inversion effect. In Y.-J. Zhang (Ed.), Advances in face image analysis: Techniques and technologies (pp. 316–333). IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011/2012a). A plea for methodological dualism and multi-explanation framework in psychology. Behavior and Philosophy, 39/40, 17–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011/2012b). Methodological dualism and multi-explanation framework: Replies to criticisms and further developments. Behavior and Philosophy, 39/40, 107–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). A feature-inversion effect: Can an isolated feature show behavior like the face-inversion effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 617–624. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Explaining the face-inversion effect: The face–scheme incompatibility (FSI) model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 665–692. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). The eye-size illusion is handled by two separate processes. American Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 329–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). How to explain behavior: A critical review and new approach. Lexington Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019a). Animals suffer too — A response to Akhtar’s “Animal pain and welfare: Can pain sometimes be worse for them than for us?” Journal of Mind and Behavior, 40(3–4), 113–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019b). The conscious unit (CU) model: A preliminary outline of a new approach to consciousness. Communications of the Blyth Institute (CBI), 1(2), 5–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Why has the field of psychology not developed like the natural sciences? Journal of Mind and Behavior, 41(3–4), 247–266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021a). The two factor theory of understanding (TFTU): Consciousness and procedures. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 42(3–4), 347–370.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021b). Understanding human conduct: The innate and acquired meaning of life. Lexington Books. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023a). AI and consciousness. AI and Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023b). Is a conscious robot a scientific hypothesis or just a faith? Journal of Mind and Behavior, 44, 147–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023c). What will happen if science develops a theory of consciousness? Negative ramifications. Journal of Conscious Evolution, 17, Article 11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). The induced-consciousness theory (ICT): A new conceptual delineation. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 45(2), 203–218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakover, S. S., & Lurie, A. (2020). Why is an inverted car identified much better than an inverted face? American Journal of Psychology, 133(1), 43–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakover, S. S., & Teucher, B. (1997). Facial inversion effects: Part and whole relationship. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(5), 752–761. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramsey, W. (2020). Eliminative materialism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reggia, J. (2013). The rise of machine consciousness: Studying consciousness with computational models. Neural Networks, 44, 112–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescorla, M. (2025). The computational theory of mind. In Edward N. Zalta, & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Revonsuo, A. (2015). Hard to see the problem? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(3–4), 52–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rhodes, G., Brak, S., Taylor, K., & Tan, S. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 80(3), 313–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rickman, P. (2009). Is psychology science? Philosophy Now, 74, 6–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robb, D., & Heil, J. (2019). Mental causation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1988). Philosophy of social science. Westview Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenthal, D. M. (2004). Varieties of higher-order theory. In R. J. Gennaro (Ed.), Higher-order theories of consciousness: An anthology (pp. 17–44). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Consciousness and mind. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenthal, D., & Weisberg, J. (2008). Higher-order theories of consciousness. Scholarpedia, 3(5), 4407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossion, B. (2008). Picture–plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128(2), 274–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: The perceptual field hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 132(3), 300–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowe, B. (2012). Retrospective: Julian Jaynes and “The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind.” American Journal of Psychology, 125(1), 95–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowlands, M. (2001). Consciousness and higher-order thoughts. Mind and Language, 16(3), 290–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Mysterianism. In M. Velmans & S. Schnieder (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (pp. 335–345). Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (1990). Four decades of scientific explanation. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuels, R. S., & Faucher, L. (2004). Reason and rationality. In I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen, & J. Wolenski (Eds.), Handbook of epistemology. Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Johnston, W. A. (2019). Redefining science: The impact on theory development in social and behavioral research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 672–690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sato, W., Kochiyama, T., & Yoshikawa, S. (2011). The inversion effect for neural and emotional facial expressions on amygdala activity. Brain Research, 1378, 84–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sattin, D., Magnani, F. G., Bartesaghi, L., Caputo, M., Fittipaldo, V., Cacciatore, M., Picozzi, M., & Leonardi, M. (2021). Theoretical models of consciousness: A scoping review. Brain Sciences, 11(5), 535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheffel, J. (2020). On the solvability of the mind–body problem. Axiomathes, 30(3), 289–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schrӧdinger, E. (1992). What is life? The physical aspects of the living cell. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schueler, G. F. (2003). Reasons and purposes: Human rationality and the teleological explanation of action. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E. (2019). Introspection. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seager, W. (2004). A cold look at HOT theory. In R. J. Gennaro (Ed.), Higher-order theories of consciousness: An anthology. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). The mystery of consciousness. A New York Review Book.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. (2005). Consciousness. In T. Honderich (Ed.). The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selmer, B., & Govindarajulu, N. S. (2024). Artificial intelligence. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seth, A. K. (in press). Conscious artificial intelligence and biological naturalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Seth, A. K., & Bayne, T. (2022). Theories of consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23, 439–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seth, A. K., Dienes, Z., Cleeremans, A., Overgaard, M., & Pessoa, L. (2008). Measuring consciousness: relating behavioral and neurophysiological approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(8), 314–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shear, J. (Ed.). (1997). Explaining consciousness: The hard problem. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sherry, D. (2011). Thermoscopes, thermometers, and the foundations of measurement. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42(4), 509–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (2017). The mind/brain identity theory. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.). Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, J. (2024). Self-consciousness. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sprenger, J., & Hartman, S. (2019). Bayesian philosophy of science. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanciu, M. M. (2014). The explanatory gap: 30 years after. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 292–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stich, S. P. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strevens, M. (2013). No understanding without explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 44(3), 510–515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swartz, N. (1985). The concept of physical law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tal, E. (2020). Measurement in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46(2), 225–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (2004). Why isn’t everyone a scientific realist? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 34(3), 363–386.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9(4), 483–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, W. H., & Skau, S. (2023). On the scope of scientific hypotheses. Royal Society, Open Science 10:230607.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tononi, G. (2015). Integrated information theory. Scholarpedia, 10(1), 4164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., & Koch, C. (2016). Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trendler, G. (2009). Measurement theory, psychology and the revolution that cannot happen. Theory & Psychology, 19(5), 579–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Conjoint measurement undone. Theory & Psychology, 29(1), 100–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, N., Andrillon, T., & Haum, A. (2020). A reply to “the unfolding argument”: Beyond functionalism/behaviorism and toward a science of causal structure theories of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 79(12), 102877–102981. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tye, M. (1995). Ten problems of consciousness. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uher, J. (2021). Psychology’s status as a science: Peculiarities and intrinsic challenges. Moving beyond its current deadlock towards conceptual integration. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 55(2), 212–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uttal, W. R. (2005) Neural theories of mind: Why the mind–brain problem may never be solved. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Are neuroreductionist explanations of cognition possible? Behavior and Philosophy, 41, 37–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion on face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79(4), 471–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallance, C. (2022, June 13). Google engineer says Lamda AI system may have its own feelings. BBC News. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallar, G. (2017). Short-term memory. Reference module in neuroscience and biobehavioral psychology. Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gulick, R. (1995). What would count as explaining consciousness? In T. Metzinger, (Ed.), Conscious experience. Ferdinand Schoningh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Consciousness. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Riel, R., & van Gulick, R. (2019). Scientific reduction. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2019 ed.). Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Scientific reduction. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Velmans, M. (1991). Is human information processing conscious? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(4), 651–669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Author’s response: Consciousness and the “causal paradox.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(3), 538–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vimal, R. L. P, & Sansthana, D. A. (2010). On the quest of defining consciousness. Mind and Matter, 8(1), 93–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Von Eckardt, B. (1993). What is cognitive science? MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wahbeh, H., Radin, D., Cannard, C., & Delorme, A. (2022). What if consciousness is not an emergent property of the brain? Observational and empirical challenges to materialistic models. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weidemann, G., Satkunarajah, M., & Lovibond, P. F. (2016). I think, therefore eyeblink: The importance of contingency awareness in conditioning. Psychological Science, 27(4), 467–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1993). Dreams of a final theory. Vintage Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinert, F. (1995). Laws of nature — Laws of science. In F. Weinert (Ed.), Laws of nature: Essays on the philosophical, scientific and historical dimensions. de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weisberg, J. (2011). Misrepresenting consciousness. Philosophical Studies, 154(4), 409–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenger, D. M. (2003). The mind’s best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 65–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2000). Explanation and invariance in the special sciences. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51(2), 197–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Explanation. In P. Machamer & M. Silberstein (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of science. Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, W., & Morales, J. (2024). The neuroscience of consciousness. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiao, W. S., Fu, G., Quinn, P. C., Sun, Y. H., Xiao, N. G., Wang, Q., Chen, G., Pascalis, O., Damon, F., & Lee, K. (2014). The eye-size illusion: Psychophysical characteristics, generality, and relation to holistic face processing. Perception, 43(3), 265–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yaron, I., Mellon, L., Pitts, M., & Mudrik, L. (2022). The ConTraSt database for analyzing and comparing empirical studies of consciousness theories. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(4), 593–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(2), 141–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Current Biology, 15(24), 2256–2262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2009). Fragmentation or differentiation: Questioning the crisis in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(2), 104–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubek, J. P. (1969). Sensory deprivation: Fifteen years of research. Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue