In:The Constitution of Phenomenal Consciousness: Toward a science and theory
Edited by Steven M. Miller
[Advances in Consciousness Research 92] 2015
► pp. 445–464
The structure of phenomenal consciousness
Published online: 17 June 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.92.20opi
https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.92.20opi
Philosophers have largely abandoned the claim that the special sciences will ultimately reduce to microphysics in favour of the view that the special sciences trade in functional explanations. However, a careful examination of scientific practice reveals that the explanatory strategy of the special sciences is neither reductionist nor functionalist, but mechanistic. Mechanistic explanations appeal to active material entities organized so as to produce the target phenomena. We claim that phenomenal consciousness will also succumb to mechanistic explanation: it will turn out to be the activity of specific neural mechanisms in the brain. In this chapter we explore the implications of this perspective for the ontology of consciousness, arguing that it has a complex structural essence.
References (45)
Bechtel, W. (2006). Discovering cell mechanisms: The creation of modern cell biology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2002). Connectionism and the mind: Parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Brown, M.E., & Swallowe, G.E. (1981). The thermal decomposition of the silver (I) and mercury (II) salts of 5-nitrotetrazole and of mercury (II) fulminate. Thermochimica Acta, 49(2–3), 333–349.
Chalmers, D.J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Craver, C.F. (2001). Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science, 68(1), 53–74.
. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Fodor, J.A. (1974). Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28(2), 97–115.
Fries, P., Nikolić, D., & Singer, W. (2007). The gamma cycle. Trends in Neurosciences, 30(7), 309–116.
Köhler, W. (1920). Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand. Braunschweig: Vieweg und Sohn.
Kurzer, F. (2000). Fulminic acid in the history of organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 851–857.
Lamme, V.A.F. (2000). Neural mechanisms of visual awareness: A linking proposition. Brain and Mind, 1(3), 385–406.
. (2004). Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; A case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Networks, 17(5–6), 861–872.
Llinás, R., Ribary, U., Contreras, D., & Pedroarena, C. (1998). The neuronal basis for consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 353(1377), 1841–1849.
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C.F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25.
McGinn, C. (1991). The problem of consciousness: Essays toward a resolution. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Miller, S.M. (2007). On the correlation/constitution distinction problem (and other hard problems) in the scientific study of consciousness. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 19(3), 159–76.
Newman, J. (1995). Thalamic contributions to attention and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 4(2), 172–193.
O’Brien, G., & Opie, J. (1998). The disunity of consciousness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 76(3), 378–395.
. (1999). A connectionist theory of phenomenal experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 127–148.
Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). Unity of science as a working hypothesis. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 2, Concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem (pp.3–36). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
Priestley, J. (1775). The history and present status of electricity, with original experiments, Vol. 1 (3rd ed.). London, UK: C. Bathurst & T. Lowndes, et al.
Revonsuo, A. (2006). Inner presence: Consciousness as a biological phenomenon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Robertson, T. (2008). Essential vs. accidental properties. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 edition). Retrieved from [URL]
Salmon, W.C. (1978). Why ask, “Why?”? An inquiry concerning scientific explanation. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 51(6), 683–705.
Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron, 24(1), 49–65.
. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information: A provisional manifesto. Biological Bulletin, 215(3), 216–242.
Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2008). The neural correlates of consciousness: An update. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 239–261.
Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001). The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(4), 229–239.
Waldmann, R., Chamigny, G., Bassilana, F., Heurteaux, C., & Lazdunski, M. (1997). A proton-gated cation channel involved in acid-sensing. Nature, 386(6621), 173–177.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
