In:Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 9] 2015
► pp. 265–280
Argumentation from analogy in migrants’ decisions
Published online: 30 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.15gre
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.15gre
Basing on the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) within the general framework of a pragma-dialectical viewpoint on argumentation, this paper analyses the role of argumentation from analogy in international migrants’ decision-making processes on the basis of a corpus of interviews to migrant mothers resident in the greater London area. Reasoning from analogy allows evaluating pragmatic decisions – such as leaving one’s home country, staying over in a foreign country, etc. – in terms of feasibility and reasonableness.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Santibáñez, Cristián & Dale Hample
2025. Sharing a language, sharing the argumentative attitude?. Journal of Argumentation in Context 14:1 ► pp. 98 ff.
Andone, Corina & Sara Greco
Greco, Sara
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
