In:Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 9] 2015
► pp. 201–214
A critique of the ubiquity of the Toulmin model in argumentative writing instruction in the U.S.A.
Published online: 30 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.11ell
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.11ell
Secondary and university instructors in the United States rely heavily on the Toulmin model to teach written argumentation. To date, pragma-dialectics (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 2004; van Eemeren 2010) is not a visible presence in American composition textbooks. This session encouraged writing consultants to ask critical questions not only associated with Toulmin's model but also those of the pragma-dialectic model of critical discussion in order to improve the critical thinking of writers.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Hart, Liam W., Michael B. Wolfe, Todd J. Williams & Gregory M. Russell
Anisa, Ari Widodo, Riandi & Muslim
Bondar, Natalia A., Susan X Day, Lee Mountain, Laura B. Turchi & Laveria F. Hutchison
Vanderheide, Jennifer, Erica Lee Beaton & Allison Wynhoff Olsen
Aziz, Farous Izwan Bin Abdul & Seriaznita Bte Mat Said
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
