In:Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 9] 2015
► pp. 175–200
The integration of pragma-dialectics and collaborative learning research
Dialogue, externalisation and collective thinking
Published online: 30 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.10bak
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.10bak
This paper describes extensions of pragma-dialectical theory for analysing learning processes in students’ argumentation dialogues. It is argued that although pragma-dialectics is the most appropriate theory in this context, it needs to be ‘psychologised’ by the consideration of additional discursive, dialogical, epistemological, interpersonal and affective dimensions of dialogue. In conclusion, prospects for new rapprochement between argumentation theory and psychology are discussed.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
DÉTIENNE, Françoise, Chloé LE BAIL & Michael BAKER
Tuzinkievicz, María Agustina, Nadia Soledad Peralta & Mariano Andrés Castellaro
ISMAIL, THAMARASSERI & K. A. SHEJEENA
Kohler, Alaric & Teuta Mehmeti
2022. From inference processes to situations of misunderstanding. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:3 ► pp. 283 ff.
Baker, Michael J. & Françoise Détienne
Baker, Michael J. & Baruch B. Schwarz
2019. “Argumentexturing”. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 195 ff.
Greco, Sara
Baker, Michael J., Françoise Détienne & Flore Barcellini
Mougenot, Céline, Françoise Détienne, Miles Pennington, Michael Baker, Tim Corvin, Clair-Antoine Veyrier, Kengo Arai & Samuel Huron
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
